Department of Social Services Home Visiting Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benchmark: Improved Maternal and Newborn Health Construct: Prenatal care Parental use of alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drugs Preconception care Inter-birth.
Advertisements

+ District of Columbia Department of Health Home Visitation Program.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
“It’s All About the Data” The Interface of Evaluation, Program Development, and Partnership to Address Substance Abuse and Reduce Child Abuse and Neglect.
Affordable Care Act Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program Audrey M. Yowell, Ph.D., M.S.S.S. Chief; Policy, Program Planning and Coordination.
White Earth Indian Child Welfare Initiative 2010
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Tom Corbett, Governor | Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Education | Gary D. Alexander, Secretary of Public Welfare.
Idaho Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program Presentation to WIC October 22, 2014.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Lynn H. Kosanovich, HFA Regional Director Introduction to the Model.
Affordable Care Act (Overview of the Administration for Children & Families) Affordable Care Act (Overview of the Administration for Children & Families)
Healthy Families America—Lincoln
1 A B C’s of Performance Based Contracting A Presentation for the Georgia Child Welfare Private Providers Provider Summit Held at the Wyndam Hotel September.
The First 5 Movement: Investing in California’s Children.
Trusts and ResourcesHealthy Communities 1 August 2010.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Child Abuse: Preventive and Reactive Interventions.
Linkages: CalWORKs and Child Welfare Collaboration to Improve Outcomes.
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Healthy Families America Overview. Healthy Families America Developed in 1992 by Prevent Child Abuse America Evidence-based home visiting model 400 Affiliated.
Kids Count in Michigan Data Book 2007 Focus on healthy children and youth.
The Role of HMG in Improving Pregnancy Outcomes Wendy Grove, Ph.D. Early Childhood Program Administrator Part C Coordinator March 24, 2011
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
Stanislaus County Children and Family Services Families In Partnership After Care Program A Parent Mentor Program.
Toward a DCFS Protective Timeline for Strengthening Families.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
Whole Child Connection™ Bob Seemer, President & COO ets, inc. System Overview Winter, 2010 ets, inc.
Santa Fe Community Baseline Report Early Childhood Indicators Prenatal – Four years Old November 16, 2015.
Center For The Study of Social Policy’s Strengthening Families A Protective Factors Framework Strengthening Families Goodwin College.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services An overview of PACE for potential participants and their families
Spirit of Health-School of Nursing Presented by Kathleen Rindahl, RN, DNP, FNP-C 13 Clinic Days = 192 Client Visits Background: Spirit of Woman, located.
Aiken County Dept. of Social Services Christine Wright, County Director Amy Kosh, HS Program Coordinator.
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Portland State University
DCF Initiatives to Prevent and Intervene in Youth Homelessness
Custody Trends.
Begin with Books set out to make sure that children receiving immunizations at the Health Department and families enrolled in Healthy Homes America received.
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
Recognizing and Responding to Child Maltreatment
Zehnacker, G., Brotherson, S., & Kranzler, B.
Informing policy, Improving programs
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes 2016
NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS FAMILY SURVEY RESULTS FY10-11
Current Activities to Support Dual Language Learners and Early Education and Care and Out of School Time Staff October 2010.
Benefits of Home Visitation
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Using Early Care and Education Administrative Data
A New Approach to Servicing Families
Comprehensive Group-Based Parenting Support
Building Bright Futures Board
PATSCH Presented by: Jacci Lake –PATSCH Certified Parent Educator
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Lynn A. Karoly RAND Corporation January 2019
Kids Count in Michigan Data Book 2007
DIVISION E—HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES EXTENDERS
IV-E Prevention Family First Implementation & Policy Work Group
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
”Supporting Parents Right from the Start”
House Human Services Committee
Amy Gorton Home Visiting Services Program Manager
Strengthening a Community Through Evidence-Based Home Visitation
Barbara Ramlow, Melissa Delaney and Carl Leukefeld
Supporting Families Together Association
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Human Trafficking and Child Welfare Services
Randomized Controlled Trial of Family Centered Treatment in North Carolina Treatment and Study Overview for NC County Departments of Social Services September.
Presentation transcript:

Department of Social Services Home Visiting Program Presented by Tasha Toebben, Children’s Division Safety and Prevention Unit Manager

Funding Distributed $4,225,147.10 is currently distributed for the Home Visiting program for FY19. $3,382038.90 for competitive awards $543,108.20 for partnership awards Funding provided through Missouri General Revenue (GR) and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)

Counties Served The Home Visiting program is located in 11 regions across the state. 8 Partnership Agreements 11 Competitive Contracts 57 counties currently served statewide

Models Supported by the DSS Home Visiting Program Supported home visiting models Healthy Families America-Healthy Babies Healthy Families Curriculum Nurturing Skills for Parents Nurse Family Partnership Promising approach model Capable Kids and Families Home visiting models currently being utilized Healthy Families America

Outcome Data Collected On a monthly basis, the following information is collected from each provider: Number of families enrolled Identifying information for each nuclear family Number of home visits completed Number of unduplicated families enrolled (families who have never previously been enrolled in the HV program Number of CD involved families enrolled Number of ineligible families Number of families who declined services Number of newborns (0-11 months) served Number of 1 year olds served (12-23 months) Number of 2 year olds served (24-35 months) Number of prenatal women served

Outcome Data Collected cont. Based on the identifying information received on each enrolled family, child abuse/neglect (CAN) data is then ran to collect the following data in order to show the overall success in reducing the risk of child abuse and neglect… Number of substantiated investigations on families after services were initiated Number of family centered services cases opened after services were initiated Number of children who entered alternative care after services were initiated

FY18 Home Visiting Outcome Data 1880 families served 2208 children (aged 0-3 years) served 95% of families who participated in the Home Visiting program did not have a substantiated CA/N investigation in the same fiscal year 95% of families who participated in the Home Visiting program did not have a family centered services case after HV services began 96% of children who participated in the Home Visiting program remained intact with their families after services began

DSS Home Visiting Program Primarily a secondary prevention program With the DSS Home Visiting (HV) program targeting populations at a higher risk of child maltreatment and requiring providers to serve 70% Children’s Division (CD) involved and/or referred families, it is identified as a secondary prevention program Families are being referred by the general public as well as CD affiliated individuals Families are being referred when they come to the attention of CD however often times indicated maltreatment has not occurred, but there is a higher risk for child maltreatment Some research has suggested that key features of successful home visiting programs in addressing child maltreatment include targeted recruitment of “at risk” families through secondary prevention measures; this is shown in the HFA model developing a child welfare adaptation specifically geared towards families involved in the child welfare system. The DSS Home Visiting program also serves as a tertiary prevention program Families are also being referred when child maltreatment has already occurred and they are working towards reunification with their children The DSS HV program is designed to remain in the home of reunited families even after CD closes their case to ensure continuity of services

DSS Home Visiting Program The Home Visiting (HV) program has proven to be not only a valuable resource for our Children’s Division (CD) families, but also our CD staff… Oftentimes families, as well as CD staff, have limited access to resources that could otherwise prevent the likelihood of children coming into state custody, which causes trauma in and of itself. The HV program is of no cost to families and is voluntary, which aids in the likelihood of the families being personally invested in the program. Not only is the HV program providing hands on education to families at risk of child abuse/neglect, but it is also aiding in preventing the future risk of child abuse/neglect. There is always room for improvement, if as a state we could have collective data then we would be able to better represent the need for HV and the positive outcomes. The state would also benefit from increased collaboration to ensure all families receive the best services to meet their need regardless of the funding source.