Small-Scale Projects Under JI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Integration of PoA and NAMA; how can one support the other Ingo Puhl South Pole Carbon Asset Management Ltd. Bonn, 8. May 2011 Prepared by South Pole.
Advertisements

Key provisions and institutional arrangements of the CDM Christine Zumkeller UNFCCC/Cooperative Mechanisms
BASELINE STANDARD UNFCCC secretariat workshop
UNFCCC secretariat, Sustainable Development Mechanisms Verónica Colerio, Standard Setting Unit Standardized Baselines in the CDM: Decisions and Way Forward.
JI Governance – review of JI Guidelines
SDM programme, UNFCCC secretariat Wenxin Li, Programme Officer Overview of PoA Standards SDM JOINT COORDINATION WORKSHOP Bonn, Germany, March 2012.
UNFCCC secretariat, programme Gyungae Ha, Programme Officer Ensuring sustainability in project assessment 7 th CDM Joint Coordination Workshop, Bonn, Germany,
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CONSULTING EGTT Workshop, September 27-29, 2004 Montreal, Canada Are Export Credit Agencies and Other Traditional Sources of Infrastructure.
T HE W ORLD B ANK C ARBON F INANCE U NIT Standardised Baselines Framework March 24-25, Bonn.
Development and Prospects for JI UNFCCC Side Event November 30, 2005 Hiroshi YAMAGATA Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry JAPAN.
1 Validation and registration Verification and issuance Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 20 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
James Grabert Manager, Joint Implementation, UNFCCC secretariat Joint Implementation Overview & Status Kyoto Protocol and Carbon Market.
UNFCCC Secretariat SDM programme Wrap-up Session: Key Issues Identified and Proposals discussed Practitioners’ workshop on Standardized baselines Bonn,
Presentation title Session 3: The Concept of Programme of Activities (PoA) PoA Registration and CPA inclusion Training-Workshop to support the “Uganda.
World Bank/KenGen Workshop on CDM Project Methodologies and Preparation October 3 & 4, 2006 CDM Contracting and Legal Issues.
Joint Implementation & Gas Flaring Reduction Projects Alexandrina Platonova-Oquab Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank.
Accreditation of Independent entities under JI - Status of JISC work Georg B ø rsting UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation, 9-10 March 2006.
Baseline and Additionality in the CDM Dr. Oscar Coto II National CDM Workshop Belize August 2011.
Standardized approaches in CDM methodologies Daniel Perczyk 7th Joint Workshop 13/03/2011.
PDD Preparation Cairo, June 14 th -15 th, 2004 TIMS/EEAA CD4CDM- Third National Workshop (Phase II) UNEP RISO / APEXPDD Preparation Process and Format.
CD4CDM Suriname, First National Workshop, April 2008 Climate Change and CDM Institutional Architecture Glenn S. Hodes UNEP Risø Center.
The African CDM Training Workshop and Preparatory UNFCCC COP9 Meeting Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, October 20 – 21, 2003 INSTITUTIONAL SET-UP FOR CDM Dr Youba.
Simplified modalities for demostration additionality to EE and RE projects: Approach to demostrate additionality in micro scale projects in Peru Ministry.
AIT Asian Regional Workshop on “Capacity Development for CDM” 19 – 21 st October 2005 Major Highlights of EB Decisions on Developments of CDM Projects.
Practical Experience with Small-scale Projects: Issues and Suggestions Johannes Heister, Lasse Ringius Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank Bonn, 9-10 March.
OVERVIEW OF CDM GUIDELINES ON UNEP CDM Guidebook/E7 Guide Dr. Bahaa Mansour TIMS Dr. Mohamed Elewa TIMS Presented by: CDM Guidelines Cairo, January 12-13,
Programmatic CDM: Eligibility, Methodological Requirements and Implementation Development Dividend Side Event December 5, 2005 Christiana Figueres Team.
Björn Zapfel UNFCCC secretariat JI small-scale projects Fourth meeting of the Joint Implementation Supervisory.
CDM Project Cycle & Project Design Document Project Design Document First Extended & Regional Workshops CD4CDM Project Siem Reap, Cambodia March.
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment CDM developments Njeri Wamukonya Regional CD workshop, 3-4 March 2003, NBI.
CD4CDM Review of Workshop 1 ….innovating energy solutions…. KITE, SSN & UNEP.
International Climate Policy Hamburg Institute of International Economics International Climate Policy Options for making small scale CDM projects more.
1 Basics of CDM Development Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 18 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
CDM Project Cycle LGED Bhaban, Dhaka 8 – 9 April 2008 Presented by Khandaker Mainuddin Fellow, BCAS.
Canada’s Experiences & Perspectives on Joint Implementation JI Technical Workshop, Bonn, 9-10 March 2006 Jeanne-Marie Huddleston, Canada’s CDM & JI Office.
Conclusions Buenos Aires, – December 5 th, 2004 CDM Methodologies and Project Design Workshop for CDM Project Developers.
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment Capacity Development for CDM - Egypt, Second National Workshop - Phase II - Cairo, January 2004.
1 PDD and PIN preparation Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 18 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
Kai-Uwe B. Schmidt Maria Netto Cooperative Mechanisms UNFCCC secretariat Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) under the Kyoto Protocol.
Seite Hier steht ein thematisches Foto Demand side perspective on JI UNFCCC Side event on Joint Implementation Gertraud Wollansky Federal Ministry.
Steps for Submission of New Baseline Methodologies National Workshop on Baseline Methodologies CD4CDM Project (Phase II) 31 March – 1 April 2004 Sami Mostafa.
CD for CDM - Second National Workshop on Baselines (Phase II) Cairo, March 31 & April 1, Capacity Development for CDM Cairo, March 31 & April 1,
Introduction to the Project Cycle Jane Ebinger Senior Energy Specialist Sustainable Development Department The World Bank.
JISC work on Small Scale JI Projects UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn 9 th March 2006 By: Fatou Ndeye Gaye and Evgeny Sokolov.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
Update on Methodological Issues Annual Meeting of the Host Country Committee Köln, May 2006.
Francisco Arango UNFCCC secretariat JI section Joint Implementation State of Play UNFCCC Technical Workshop on.
Visit of the S. Korean delegation UNEP Risø Centre, 1 September 2005 Jørgen Fenhann Analysis of the CDM project pipeline Content of the presentation: What.
Italian policies and programmes on JI
JISC – work accomplished and challenges ahead
OVERVIEW OF CDM GUIDELINES ON UNEP CDM Guidebook/E7 Guide
Validation of Forest-based Carbon Projects
Example(s) of JI Track 1 procedures
Environmental and SD guidelines - for ITMOS and the SDM
German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt)
JISC work regarding criteria for baseline setting and monitoring
Baseline setting and monitoring under Joint Implementation
Joint Implementation A Parties and Buyers Perspective
Baseline setting and monitoring under JI compared to the CDM approach
The various tracks of JI…
Q&A sessions at UNFCCC SB26
Session 1 Guidelines for projects under Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol First UNFCCC workshop on implementation of Article 6 projects under the Kyoto Protocol.
Small Scale Projects – Learning from the CDM Paul Soffe
Theoretical differences between CDM and JI validation/determination
Joint Implementation and the Clean Development Mechanism
JISC from COP/MOP 1 to COP/MOP 2 UNFCCC Technical Workshop on JI
Carbon Finance at EBRD: IGOs’ perspectives
Development of determination and verification manual (DVM)
Joint implementation programmes of activities (JI PoA)
THE KYOTO PROTOCOL AND BEYOND: A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE, Siena June 10, 2006 The Clean Development Mechanism: Challenges and Opportunities Axel Michaelowa.
Presentation transcript:

Small-Scale Projects Under JI Michiel ten Hoopen - EcoSecurities UNFCCC JI workshop, Bonn,13-14 February 2007

Why SSC JI procedures? Benefits to host country (more opportunity in poor regions). Lower transaction costs: Using simplified baseline methodologies; Reduced fees for first 15,000 CERs. SSC projects are successful in CDM. Good progress already by using CDM SSC meths.

Use of CDM Methodologies Source: UNEP Risoe, CDM Pipeline Overview, 1.2.2007

Use of CDM SSC Meths & CDM Meths under JI Note: Does not include “Own Format” JI Meths Source: UNEP Risoe, CDM Pipeline Overview, 1.2.2007

Use of SSC Methodologies in CDM Source: UNEP Risoe, CDM Pipeline Overview, 1.2.2007

SSC JI – Track 2: Rules & Regulations (1) Separate JI SSC PDD Form is available Definitions (same as CDM): Type I: RE projects up to 15 MW; Type II: EE projects (supply & demand side) up to 60 GWh p.a. (was 15 GWh); Type III: Other projects, less than 60 kt CO2e emission reductions p.a. (was 15kt project emissions). For combination of types in one project: each component may not exceed its type threshold. New categories: initiated & approved by JISC or submission to JISC by project participants. Other option for new categories/meths: use large scale options.

SSC JI – Track 2: Rules & Regulations (2) Baseline setting and monitoring: CDM SSC meths may be used but no obligation (large scale meth or self-developed meth may be used instead); Use of multi-project emission factor is possible (large scale); Leakage is only considered within the boundary of non-Annex I country , if applicable. Additionality: No separate provisions for SSC More options compared to CDM, 5 options: If CDM meth is used: Use prescribed method; Apply CDM EB “Tool for Additionality”; Apply any other CDM EB approved method (e.g. SSC barrier test may be used for LS projects?); Independent transparent and traceable proof that project scenario is not part of the baseline scenario; Use additionality proof that was previously determined and which is comparable to the project (same GHG mitigation measure, same country, similar technology, similar scale).

SSC JI – Track 2: Rules & Regulations (3) Debundling (same as CDM, 4 criteria on de-bundling). Bundling: Applicable projects may be bundled at different stages: PDD; Determination (para. 33); Monitoring; Determination (para. 37). Bundles do not need to consist of same project categories. Projects in bundle must have same crediting period. Projects in bundle must comply with JI SSC provisions (thresholds). Bundle composition may not change over time. Special form to approve different components as part of the bundle. Use same PDD for bundle if technology/ measure and location in the territory of the Host Party are identical; otherwise separate PDDs have to be submitted.

SSC JI – Track 2: Rules & Regulations (4) Determination, para 33 (validation) by AIE, checks: Thresholds; Correspond with category; Not a debundled component; If bundling conditions are satisfied; If a review is requested: determination of all projects in bundle is concerned. Determination, para 37 (verification) by AIE, checks: That bundle component thresholds are not exceeded. No clarity yet on separate AIE for both procedures (for large scale).

Strengths Adopt CDM procedures/ methodologies (existing knowledge). Higher SSC thresholds in CDM also for JI. Flexible rules on bundling.

Weaknesses Prone to same weaknesses as CDM (e.g. some SSC meths are complex). Host country approval process is time consuming (no fast track SSC). Overall time spent and costs on SSC development still comparable to large scale. Buyers look for large volumes (often >50,000 t CO2e/year).

Conclusions / Recommendations Good progress already. More clarity and guidelines on regulatory framework will benefit SSC JI project pipeline. Host countries could simplify SSC project approval. Once CDM rules are finalized: programmatic JI? Once Track 1 is in place: SSC projects may go into GIS. Grant facilities could cover costs to promote JI SSC development.

Thank You! Michiel@EcoSecurities.com Phone: + 31 70 365 4749