Result Orientation of Interreg Programmes

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Results Based Monitoring (RBM)

Advertisements

A NEW METRIC FOR A NEW COHESION POLICY by Fabrizio Barca * * Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance. Special Advisor to the European Commission. Perugia,

1 EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Evaluation: Setting Outcome Indicators and Targets Seminar: 15 March 2011, La Hulpe Veronica Gaffey Acting Director.

Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation

A Fresh Look at the Intervention Logic of Structural Funds

Designing Influential Evaluations Session 1 Introduction Uganda Evaluation Week - Pre-Conference Workshop 19 th and 20 th May 2014.

Standards and Guidelines for External Quality Assurance 19 May 2009 Axel Aerden International Policy Advisor.

Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.

Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.

Result orientation: Telling the story of European Territorial Cooperation Skellefteå, 19 September 2013.

Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.

V4 Expert Group V4 Expert Group Result Orientation Challenges – 17 June 2014 Budapest.

KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.

IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.

1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.

26 June 2008 DG REGIO Evaluation Network Meeting Ex-post Evaluation of Cohesion Policy Programmes co-financed by the European Fund for Regional.

Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.

Regional Policy European Commission 1 10/17/2015 Wolfgang Petzold DG REGIO 10 September 2004 SFIT meeting on evaluation DG REGIO's Information and Communication.

Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.

1 International Conference Evaluation: Evidence-based Tools for Decision-making Future Cohesion Policy: Implications for Monitoring and Evaluation Budapest.

1 Monitoring & evaluation 2013+: concepts and ideas (ERDF & CF) CMEF meeting, 17 th June 2011, Kai Stryczynski, DG REGIO Evaluation Unit.

Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.

Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.

Evaluation of NRNs Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor.

"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.

Regional Policy Results Indicators Findings of the Pilots Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit, DG for Regional Policy.

Driving towards Impact through Development Goals Washington, DC 04/13/2011.

A RADICAL SHIFT TOWARDS A MORE RESULTS-ORIENTED COHESION POLICY IS BOTH NEEDED AND POSSIBLE Ideas from the Report “An agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy”

04/2007 THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY & ITS INSTRUMENTS OF IMPLEMENTATION Preparation & Draft of environmental projects THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY.

IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.

Building an ENI CBC project

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING

Self Assessment for Pastoral Care

SCOA for Municipalities:

The State of the Nation Report:

PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE

Introduction - Final activity reporting

Evaluation : goals and principles

SCOA for Municipalities:

Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme

Veronica Gaffey & Antonella Schulte-Braucks

Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations

Ex post evaluation of ERDF and Cohesion Fund

HUMAN RESOURCE GOVERNANCE, RISK MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE

Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting

Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert

Joint session with IHP+ introduction

Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.

Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance

Evaluation network DG REGIO 14th April 2011

ESF Performance reports and Thematic reports

EUSDR Action Plan - Revision

Results Indicators Findings of the Pilots Veronica Gaffey

TÓTH Gábor DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion

What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.

EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals

WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?

DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion

Territorial Cooperation and Territorial Cohesion Results of the consultation on the consultation Input to TCUM seminar 25 September 2009 | Brussels.

Guidance document on ex ante evaluation

Teodora Brandmuller Head of Section – Regional and urban statistics

Reviewing Core Indicators

OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010

Wednesday 13 September UKCF Conference Cardiff

Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.

What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.

Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges

How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?

Presentation transcript:

Result Orientation of Interreg Programmes Interreg Annual Meeting 2015 15 September 2015, Esch sur Alzette (LU) A.Mairate, DG REGIO D.1

Structure 1. Focus 2. The logic 3. The process 4. Basic principles A.Mairate, DG REGIO D.1

Shift of focus towards results From actions and financial means to their results (or outcomes) in terms of well-being and progress Means rather than ends Policy effectiveness Shape programme objectives towards intended results A.Mairate, DG REGIO D.1

Intended Results Actual The logical framework Implementing Programming Strategy Other Factors Needs Thematic Priorities Intended Results Actual Contribution Policy Allocated INPUTS Targeted OUTPUTS Achieved A.Mairate, DG REGIO D.1

The process Choosing a policy action : intended result on beneficiaries Baselines and target setting Theory of change Measurement and reporting Impact evaluation A.Mairate, DG REGIO D.1

Basic principles Reasonable: clearly representing a feature of the outcome. Normative: having an accepted interpretation of what is a “favourable” change. Robust: reliable, and statistically and analytically validated. Responsive to policy: potentially responsive to policy in a significant way (not remote). Feasible: not imposing too large a financial burden, if any. Debatable: timely available to the stakeholders and subject to revision. A.Mairate, DG REGIO D.1