Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Maryam Sayadi, Seiichiro Tanizaki, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Ining Jou, Murugappan Muthukumar  Biophysical Journal 
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Lars Kjaer, Lise Giehm, Thomas Heimburg, Daniel Otzen 
Folding Pathways of Prion and Doppel
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 107, Issue 10, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 106, Issue 8, Pages (April 2014)
Maria A. Vorontsova, Ho Yin Chan, Vassiliy Lubchenko, Peter G. Vekilov 
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Alfonso Jaramillo, Shoshana J. Wodak  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Complex Energy Landscape of a Giant Repeat Protein
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Meng Qin, Jian Zhang, Wei Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Ion Specificity and Nonmonotonic Protein Solubility from Salt Entropy
A Second Look at Mini-Protein Stability: Analysis of FSD-1 Using Circular Dichroism, Differential Scanning Calorimetry, and Simulations  Jianwen A. Feng,
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages (August 2017)
Nonadditivity in Conformational Entropy upon Molecular Rigidification Reveals a Universal Mechanism Affecting Folding Cooperativity  Oleg K. Vorov, Dennis.
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Alfonso Jaramillo, Shoshana J. Wodak  Biophysical Journal 
Jason K. Cheung, Thomas M. Truskett  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Thermodynamic Characterization of the Unfolding of the Prion Protein
Untangling the Influence of a Protein Knot on Folding
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Translational Entropy and DNA Duplex Stability
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
A Mesoscale Model of DNA and Its Renaturation
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
M. Boström, D.R.M. Williams, B.W. Ninham  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Tao Jiang, Zhen-Gang Wang, Jianzhong Wu  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 97, Issue 9, Pages (November 2009)
Hierarchical Cascades of Instability Govern the Mechanics of Coiled Coils: Helix Unfolding Precedes Coil Unzipping  Elham Hamed, Sinan Keten  Biophysical.
Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Nikolay V. Dokholyan 
Ining Jou, Murugappan Muthukumar  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Pawel Gniewek, Andrzej Kolinski  Biophysical Journal 
Anisotropic Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides
Modelling Toehold-Mediated RNA Strand Displacement
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Dependence of Protein Folding Stability and Dynamics on the Density and Composition of Macromolecular Crowders  Jeetain Mittal, Robert B. Best  Biophysical.
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Daniel Seeliger, Bert L. de Groot  Biophysical Journal 
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Drazen Petrov, Xavier Daura, Bojan Zagrovic  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Evolution of Specificity in Protein-Protein Interactions
Presentation transcript:

Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages 65-75 (January 2018) Effects of pH and Salt Concentration on Stability of a Protein G Variant Using Coarse- Grained Models  Vinícius Martins de Oliveira, Vinícius de Godoi Contessoto, Fernando Bruno da Silva, Daniel Lucas Zago Caetano, Sidney Jurado de Carvalho, Vitor Barbanti Pereira Leite  Biophysical Journal  Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages 65-75 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.012 Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A) Structure of PGB1-QDD is built from wild-type protein with PDB:1PGB. The side chains are shown for residues that have major contributions to protein stability. (B) Shown here is the primary sequence of PGB1-QDD with highlighted acidic residues, which have the highest charge variations in the studied pH range. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.012) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Electrostatic energy contribution to free energy native state stability ΔGelec as a function of pH in kJ/mol. The values were calculated from TKSA simulation analysis for 23 different pH values from 1.0 to 12.0. The solid circles represent values for 0.15 M of a monovalent salt concentration in simulation and the open squares represent values of 2.0 M of salt concentration. (Inset) Plot shows the experimental results of the free energy difference between the unfolded and the native state ΔG° from 1PGB-QDD as a function of pH in kJ/mol. The solid circles represent values for 0.15 M of NaCl, and the open squares represent values for 2.00 M of NaCl (adapted from (37)). Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.012) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Charge–charge interaction energy ΔGqq calculated by the TKSA model for each ionizable residue. (A–D) Given here are the energy profiles of pH values 2.5, 4.5, 7.5 and 10.0, respectively. The red bars indicate the residues with the side chain exposed to solvent with SASA ≥ 50% and positive energy contribution to native state stability, most of these residues are located between D36 and E42. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.012) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Thermodynamic properties of 1PGB-QDD folding. (A) Shown here are heat capacities at constant volume (Cv) in low, intermediate, and high salt concentrations. Solid black lines are for pH 2.5, short dashed red lines are for pH 4.5, long dashed blue lines are for pH 7.5, and dashed/dotted green lines are for pH 10.0. (B) Given here are free energy curves as a function of the reaction coordinate Q for the same three salt concentrations. All systems are at T close to TM (melting temperature) of pH 7.5 in each ionic strength. It is considered that the melting temperature corresponds to the peak of Cv. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.012) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Values of melting temperature TM∗ in reduced temperature as a function of pH. Black circles are for low salt, red squares are for an intermediate ionic strength, and blue diamonds are for high salt concentration. Inset graphic presents the experimental results of TM∗ as a function of pH in similar salt conditions to simulation (adapted from (37)). Dashed lines connecting symbols help guide the eye. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.012) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 2D map of the distribution of electrostatic energy as a function of the reaction coordinate Q for pH 2.5, 4.5, 7.5, and 10.0. The color map represents the probability distribution of the electrostatic energy and Q, normalized by its highest value. All the systems are at T ≈ TM and intermediate salt concentration. The value q represents the net charge of 1PGB-QDD in each minimum. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.012) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Titration curves of residue D22: ionization degree α as a function of pH. (A) The value α is calculated for the folded 1PGB-QDD using the CpHMD model. (B) The value α is calculated for the unfolded 1PGB-QDD via the CpHMD model. (C) The value α is calculated for the folded protein using the TKSA model. Red curves are the fit of the Hill equation (Eq. 7). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2018 114, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.012) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions