What do our students know?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The IB MYP Design Cycle….
Advertisements

Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
Assessed: 2010, 2011, SLO 4.1: Identify and describe the impact of the global economy on business decisions. SLO 4.2: Explain and apply a global.
1 General Education Assessment at Cleveland State University What We Have Accomplished What We Have Yet to Do.
Assessing Students Ability to Communicate Effectively— Findings from the College of Technology & Computer Science College of Technology and Computer Science.
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Assessed: 5 Cycles 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013.
What do our students know?. What do we want our UG students to know? Student Learning Outcome Cycle #1 Assessed in: Cycle #2 Assessed in: Cycle #3 Assessed.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
College of Business Administration Lessons Learned Part I Assurance of Learning: Strategic Planning through Programmatic Assessment Kathleen A. Krentler.
Assessed: 2007, 2010, 2011,  PHIL 101 (Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics)  GE elective choice  BA 300 (Ethical Decision Making in Business)
What do our students know? A complete cycle of assessment: the common learning outcomes we hold for our UG students: Round IV,
Program Assessment: What Difference Does it Make? Ross Miller, AAC&U.
What do our students know? A complete cycle of assessment: the common learning outcomes we hold for our UG students: Round III,
Thinking Critically. Mission Statement Course Level SLOs and Assessments Program Level SLOs and Assessment s Assessing ICCs.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Dr. Christopher L. Markwood Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi January 23, 2014.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
Integration of generic competencies and content in the Skills for a Changing World Curriculum Key Issues to Consider.
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
Curriculum Development Project For The Financial Services –IPI –
Faculty Evaluations: Tenured, Tenure-Track, and Associate
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Fullerton College SLOA Workshop:
1.03 Workplace Skills Accounting I
Rubrics, Rubrics, & More Rubrics
Institutional Student Learning Outcome Assessment Report Fall 2015 Assessment Cycle
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Assessment of Student Learning
Masters in Public Administration
Reading, Writing & Math at Grade Level
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Business Department’s Assessment Process
New Student Experience
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Learning goals and assessment (MBA)
Business Assessment Test Results
Simon Milton – Professional Officer
Mapping Outcomes it’s not so bad.
Accounting I Objective 1.03 Understanding Skills Needed
LAW112 Assessment 3 Haley McEwen.
February 24, 2009 Joint Session of Congress
Effective Use of Rubrics to Assess Student Learning
Business Assessment Test Results
Phase 1: Core Learning Goals & Objectives
Oklahoma State University
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
Collecting Data to Assess Capstone and Culminating Courses
Creating an Interdisciplinary assessment activity Flex day 1/12/2017
GMMD Program Canino School of Engineering Technology Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
BTECH Dental Hygiene School of Science, Health & Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Accounting I Objective 1.03 Understanding Skills Needed
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : January 18, 2018
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
Presentation transcript:

What do our students know? A complete cycle of assessment: the common learning outcomes we hold for our UG students. 2004 - 2008

What do we want our UG students to know? Student Learning Outcome Assessed in . . . Communication Skills Oral 2004-2005 Written 2005-2006 Critical Thinking Skills 2006-2007 Ethical Reasoning Skills 2007-2008 Essential Business Principles Annually

What do our UG students know? ORAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS Assessed from planned presentations in capstone courses across departments. Assessed using a 3 point rubric (Good, Fair, Poor). Assessed on four criteria: Eye Contact Delivery Organization Visual Aids

The student will communicate effectively with individuals, teams, and large groups – focus: oral communication. Students Self-Report of their Oral Communication Skills: 5.68 on a 6 point scale

What do our UG students know? WRITTEN COMMUNICATION SKILLS Assessed using written assignments from capstone courses across departments. Assessed using a 4 point rubric (Meets/Exceeds Standards, Approaches Standards, Inadequate, Failing). Assessed on three criteria: Ability to Plan Ability to Develop Writing Mechanics

The student will use clear and concise communication in the written form 8-10: Meets/Exceeds Standards 6-7: Approaches Standards 4-5: Inadequate 0-3: Failing Students Self-Report of their Written Communication Skills: 5.59 on a 6 point scale

What do our UG students know? CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS Assessed using individual case assignments from MGT 405, the college-wide capstone course. Assessed using a 4 point rubric (Individually defined but points roughly corresponding to: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor/Failing). Assessed on three criteria: Ability to Identify Key Issue(s) Use of Evidence & Data in Analysis Conclusions and Recommendations

Critical Thinking Skills Students Self Report of their Critical Thinking Skills: 5.95 on a 6 point scale

What do our UG students know? ETHICAL REASONING SKILLS Assessed using embedded questions on final in BA 300 – Ethical Decision Making in Business SLO #1: Explain the various ethical dimensions of business decision making and the role of various stakeholders in this decision making. (3 Qs) SLO #2: Assess the ethics of decision alternatives using different approaches and philosophies. (4 Qs)

Ethical Reasoning Skills Students Self Report of their Ethical Reasoning Skills: 5.87 on a 6 point scale

What do our UG students know? ESSENTIAL BUSINESS PRINCIPLES Assessed via the Business Assessment Test (BAT) – 80 Multiple Choice Qs Administered across the CSU system Given in MGT 405, the college-wide capstone course BAT has traditionally banned calculators – experiment testing with and without in 2008 indicated no significant difference

SDSU Longitudinal Comparisons Students Self Report of their essential knowledge across all core business disciplines: 5.48 on a 6 point scale

SDSU & CSU Longitudinal Comparisons

What do our students know? Summary Communication Skills Our students are fairly good oral communicators Our students are only fair writers, their weakest link in writing is basic mechanics Critical Thinking Skills Our students are only fair critical thinkers on any measure other than problem identification Ethical Reasoning Skills Our students have good ethical reasoning skills Essential Business Principles Our students are generally weak on knowledge of essential business principles