WS1: Overall remarks plenary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marine Core Service MY OCEAN The GMES MyOcean Marine Service Bertil Håkansson SMHI, Core Service MyOcean Core User Requirements.
Advertisements

Marine Core Service MY OCEAN MyOcean service and product specification Dominique Obaton.
European COastal-shelf sea OPerational monitoring and forecasting system ECOOP.
The new ECOOP suggestion from Norway (Met.no, NERSC, IMR) Why new? Because: Too little focus on clear objectives and specific products Products and services.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Overview of existing marine assessments in Europe (North East Atlantic, Baltic Sea, Mediterranean and Black Seas) Frédéric Brochier UNESCO/IOC Consultant.
1 EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON WATER The EEA’s needs for data and information on transitional, coastal and marine waters - proposed indicators.
Baltic Operational Oceanographic System (BOOS) Erik Buch Centre for Ocean and Ice.
Marine Core Service MY OCEAN WP 18 URD Synthesis Marine and Coastal Environment.
Marine Core Service MY OCEAN WP 18 URD Synthesis - Climate and Weather Forecasting.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
Creating a national plan for the regional contribution to National ICOOS.
Main elements of an Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Programme:Coast and Hydrography Integrated Correspondence Group on Monitoring 30 March-1 April.
Marine and coastal thematic assessment for the EEA’s 2010 State of the Environment report Trine Christiansen (EEA)
Consultation meetings: Jan 2005, Brussels, consultation meeting on topics for FP7 2-3 Feb 06, Brussels, Symposium in memoriam Anver Ghazi 17 Feb 06, Text.
Arctic Operational Oceanography at IMR Einar Svendsen Arctic GOOS planning meeting, September 2006 at NERSC, Bergen.
Henning Wehde I IMR I 2013, June 18/19th I UPMC I Paris JERICO MID TERM REVIEW Wp 2 Strengthening regional and trans-regional.
FP7* support to GEO activities Update for 5 th GEO ADC Meeting A Edwards Washington, D.C., U.S.A September 2007 * FP7 is the European Community’s.
Marine Core Service Marine Core Service presentation 15 May 2008 The GMES Marine Core Service n Outline –What is GMES Marine Core Service, its design and.
Henning Wehde I IMR I 5 to / Oslo / Norway 2 nd General Assembly – NIVA HQ WP 2 Strengthening regional.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
ECOSTAT WG2A meeting 7-8 October 2004 Eutrophication Activity Status report Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
WP 9 Ecosystem modelling and data assimilation The overall objective is to improve forecasts of the pre-operational systems with quantitative evaluation.
WISE and WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe and Water Information System for Europe (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web- site near you)
Outcomes from EMODnet/MSFD coordination meetings A. Giorgetti, M. Lipizer, M. Vinci EMODnet Chemistry, 3 rd year meeting, June 8-9, 2016 Helsinki, Finland.
Moving away from the fish-eye view Integrating Surveys for the Ecosystem Approach 29 May 2013, Ingeborg de Boois (WGISUR)
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) The key and only legislation completely focused on the marine environment Clear ecosystem based thinking.
EUROPEAN MARINE STRATEGY Thematic Strategy for the Protection and Conservation of the Marine Environment Demetrio de Armas IEO-Spain.
EMODnet Chemistry 3 Kick-off Meeting May 2017
Expert Meeting Methods for assessing current and future coastal vulnerability to climate change 27 – 28 October 2010 Draft conclusions.
EMODnet Chemistry MSFD Board of Experts
1.
‘Work of the EEA aimed at streamlining marine assessment processes’
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
New Work Programme and mandates 2005/2006
Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Concept and state-of-play
D5 EUTROPHICATION REVIEW PROCESS
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
EEA–EMMA Workshop November 2006
Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8
‘Basic approach: Reporting and data handling’
Strategic Coordination Group Eutrophication Guidance
MSFD Com Dec 2010/477/EU review Recommendations for D5; Outcomes of the D5 workshop 14th meeting of the Working Group on Good Environmental Status.
Synthesis of EEA-led EMMA workshops on:
Ana Cristina Cardoso & Mark Dowell
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
European Commission DG Environment
Update on work of EMMA “European marine monitoring and assessment”
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
River Basin Management Plans
HELCOM and operational oceanography
Cluster Knowledge Integration and Dissemination
Trine Christiansen Constanca Belchior
Progress SOE –drafting group
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
1.
Eva Royo Gelabert Project Manager Marine assessments
Partcipants - presentations
Reporting units for MSFD assessments
Geographic Visualisation of Reporting Information
Streamlining of monitoring and reporting under WFD, Nitrates Directive and EEA's SoE –concept paper DG Environment.
Stefan Jensen - head - SEIS and SDI group
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
River Basin Management Plans
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Uli Claussen Co-lead ECOSTAT
Presentation transcript:

WS1: Overall remarks plenary Major investments in O.O. during the past 15 years: Global, regional, national. Function under EuroGOOS and regional OOS/M: Need to take advantage and use them for MMA in Europe Current phase of O.O.: transition from research to mainstream production. GMES MCS provides the framework Need for: consolidation – coherence – quality – avoid overlapping taking user needs into account Need to strength links between regional conventions (+env. Agencies) and regional O.O. (OOS/N). Continue dialogue on proper governance (e.g. agreements)

WS1: Overall remarks plenary How can OO contribute to MMA ?: Contribute to indicators (esp State and Impact of DPSIR) Temporal variability (trends, anomalies) Spatial variability & dynamics (e.g. effect of circulation on pollution transport) Contribute to crisis management & episodic events (oil spills, algae blooms) that affect state of marine environment Provide context for in-situ sampling (optimum observations)

Group2: Overall Discussion There are terminology “problems” but we need to focus on the “common objective” and identify synergies (improve MMA by using OO information products that are “fit for purpose”, focusing on: delivery, quality and timeliness) O.O. definition: systematic – long term monitoring combining all available observations with modeling -assimilation systems to generate hindcasting-nowcasting-forecasting products of well defined standards (error bars/ quality / delivery) Discussion on the 2 of 3 themes: Physical features (A1-A4), primary and secondary productivity (C8, D1) Focused on MSD table but also extend to extra physical parameters as needed for EEA assessments

Group2: Overall Discussion Governance issues; conventions are using binding agreements; EuroGOOS/OOS/N are based on institutional & national contributions but still not intergovernmental MERSEA; Demonstration project of upgraded national capabilities; how to take it over to fully operational capability? only possible if MCS is implemented to sustain and improve existing capabilities. WFD is a user of all these products Final conclusion: exercise worth running even without MSD

Group2: recommendations Regional sea conventions to highlight possible new indicators and data sets as needed for their forthcoming 2009-2010 assessments to allow proper response from O.O Draft joint collaboration actions between conventions and regional OOS/N to fulfill the above. Meeting already agreed between HELCOM-BOOS ICES to fill tables, HELCOM to revise indicator titles used in relevant tables (self explanatory) Governance issues to be further elaborated Recognizing the value of bringing the 2 communities together, consider future meeting to address implementation issues

Group2: Summary of A1-A4 Strong OO contribution to physical features (less for bathymetry). Many data / products available and used in assessments (definition of seasonal variability, trends, anomalies etc). Fit for purpose products can be delivered Contribution goes beyond MSD tables (“extra’) To do: Add OOS/N contribution Remove NOAA, GODAE global products Ask ICES to add info on currents & water exchange Delete “Climate Variability” entry; addressed implicitly in the extra physical features table

Group2: Discussion on “extra” physical parameters Overall context: OO data sets can be used to attribute pressures to impacts (in particular for climate change) Sea Level: climate change, coastal – link to bathymetry (MERSEA, OOS/N) Ice (HELCOM, MERSEA, ArcticGOOS) Waves regime (mixing, impact on ecosystem, erosion, bottom drag) (HELCOM, OOS/N) Light (vertical variability – impact on ecosystem functioning) MERSEA, HELCOM, JRC, OOS, (all above: data sets – not indicators – operational)

Group2: Discussion on Biological elements (1) Include fisheries ? Not well developed. Still subregional; need to be upscaled; enlarged with new techniques Increase synergies between all actors involved in ecosystem based approach include DG fish OO products already used in the context of fish assessments of ICES Limit to our present capabilities: phytoplankton – zooplankton – nutrients – oxygen (R/S, in-situ, modeling)

Group2: Discussion on Biological elements (2) C8: Chlorophyll-a Chl-a measurements by OO are mainly limited to surface (R/S, FB). Need to expand/add this capability to gliders, floats etc. Among other, such data are needed for model validation. For R/S products we need: a) long time series to identify trends b) improved ground truth validation at a regional scale. Comparability – compatibility issues. Phytoplankton species composition is already measured by FB and R/S Zooplankton measured by CPR. Possibly add an entry at the relevant table Additional products (species composition, biomass, community structure) are made available by OO at regional scales (ecosystem models). Soon available at pan European level

Group2: Discussion on Biological elements (3) D1: Nutrients Operational data already used in the Baltic for assessments Nutrient cycling: data sets available for North Sea; still under development; need to be upscaled and strengthened Nutrients budget: gap to be filled

Group2: Summary of C8-D1 OO products are already available primarily for phytoplankton and secondarily for zooplankton, nutrients, oxygen Limited observing capacity compared to physical parameters: need for further developments (monitoring systems, analysis methods) Marine ecosystem models are in pre-operational phase of development. Soon to be available on a European scale Need to improve our understanding of system functioning to be able to interpret / use data

Group2: Actions Extract further recommendations from day1/day2 general comments Revise indicator table with results from discussion Match indicator and monitoring table Send our report for comments

Group2: Detailed – specific Actions A1: Add reference to regional data sets. A2: Remove NOAA A2: Replace “Sea Surface Temperature” by “Sea Temperature” (thermal regime)

Group2: Actions Table C8: Chl-a Add OOS/N, JRC check input from BSC to A1-5 tables Table D1 Remove “spatial distribution” Change “nutrients conditions” to “nutrients concentration” For D1 table, change order of 5-6 (oxygen, primary production)