Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Data for a Healthy Nation by Mary H. Stanfill, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P.
Advertisements

UNCLASSIFIED National GPS Interference Detection and Mitigation (IDM) 49 th CGSIC Savannah, GA John Merrill DHS PNT Program Manager Office of Applied Technology.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
BLM Data Quality. Purpose - after this course you will be able to… Describe why Data Quality matters Describe why Data Quality matters Define what is.
Developing a Hiring System OK, Enough Assessing: Who Do We Hire??!!
Metrics for Process and Projects
Group 3 John Gregory John Marsh Gerri Houston Samantha McNeily.
ProCognis SOX 404 & COSO Implementation Presentation
Week 7: Requirements validation Structured walkthroughs Why have walkthroughs When to have walkthroughs Who participates What procedures are helpful Thoughtless.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9 Homework: 1-9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics ~
Hypothesis test with t – Exercise 1 Step 1: State the hypotheses H 0 :  = 50H 1 = 50 Step 2: Locate critical region 2 tail test,  =.05, df = =24.
Software project management (intro)
Reporting Results for Pesticide Programs Robin Powell, EM Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Environmental Department.
The Calibration Process
Lineage February 13, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
Total Quality Management BUS 3 – 142 Statistics for Variables Week of Mar 14, 2011.
CESSDA Expert-Seminar 2004 Data Processing and Publishing Enhancing Dataset Quality - Plausibility – strategies of data checking Meinhard Moschner ZA,
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
Unit 4: Monitoring Data Quality For HIV Case Surveillance Systems #6-0-1.
September 26, 2012 DATA EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS IN SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
ETL By Dr. Gabriel.
GASB 34: Asset Management and GIS Jarrod Gerbaud Hansen Information Technologies.
Determining Sample Size
PRM 702 Project Risk Management Lecture #28
Assessment Report Department of the Earth Sciences School of Science and Mathematics James Zollweg Chair + Assessment Coordinator.
GIS Data Quality Evaluator Version 4.0 DataLOGIC, Inc. DataLOGIC Corporation 72 Dartmouth Avenue Avondale Estates, GA
Project Management Chapter 3. Objectives Become familiar with estimation. Be able to create a project workplan. Understand why project teams use timeboxing.
Domain & Simplifying by Factoring Objectives:  Be able to find the domain of rational and radical expressions.  Be able to use GCF to factor expressions.
Chapter 3: Software Maintenance Process Omar Meqdadi SE 3860 Lecture 3 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University of Wisconsin-Platteville.
VARIATION, VARIABLE & DATA POSTGRADUATE METHODOLOGY COURSE Hairul Hafiz Mahsol Institute for Tropical Biology & Conservation School of Science & Technology.
How do we represent the world in a GIS database?
IOPS Toolkit for Risk-based Supervision Module 4: Risk Mitigation and Scoring.
ArcGIS Data Reviewer: An Introduction
The (ab)use of symptom scores in asthma clinical trials: a systematic review Geoff Frampton & Jonathan Shepherd Southampton Health Technology Assessments.
Chapter 9 Introduction to the t Statistic. 9.1 Review Hypothesis Testing with z-Scores Sample mean (M) estimates (& approximates) population mean (μ)
Data Staging Data Loading and Cleaning Marakas pg. 25 BCIS 4660 Spring 2012.
Chapter Eight: Using Statistics to Answer Questions.
Metadata By N.Gopinath AP/CSE Metadata and it’s role in the lifecycle. The collection, maintenance, and deployment of metadata Metadata and tool integration.
7 Strategies for Extracting, Transforming, and Loading.
Information Technology Project Management Managing IT Project Risk.
University of Sunderland CIFM02 Unit 5 COMM02 Project Hazard Management and Contingency Planning Unit 5.
Copyright © 2006 by Maribeth H. Price 13-1 Chapter 13 Working with Geodatabases.
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis FMEA Lecture 11. What is FMEA? Failure mode and effect analysis is an Advanced Quality Planning tool that: examines potential.
Chapter © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Course: Research in Biomedicine and Health III Seminar 5: Critical assessment of evidence.
T tests comparing two means t tests comparing two means.
John Batty DEFRA UK Bratislava November Legal Background For any given surface water body, applying the MAC-EQS means that the measured concentration.
IT 21103/ System Analysis & Design. Chapter 14 Testing, Documentation, Training Chapter 15 Conversion, Maintenance, Review.
Managing Project Risk – A simplified approach Presented by : Damian Leonard.
Risk Identification and Evaluation Chapter 2
Lecture #8 Thursday, September 15, 2016 Textbook: Section 4.4
ArcGIS Data Reviewer: Assessing Positional Accuracy
Introduction to GIS GIS in Cadastral Management
The Calibration Process
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
How does a Requirements Package Vary from Project to Project?
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Components of Experiments
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
6.1 Quality improvement Regional Course on
Software metrics.
Data Validation Methods WFD GIS Working Group
The bottom-up approach: Challenges in the production of statistical grid data Rina Tammisto European Forum for Geostatistics, Workshop 1- 3 October 2008.
Chapter Nine: Using Statistics to Answer Questions
Yves Goulet Director, National Fisheries Intelligence Service
Accomplished Recommendation Planned Actions for Control
Presentation transcript:

Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations R.A.D.E.G.O.

Background Business decisions based on data quality require: Data Origin/Background Data Maintenance History Metadata: can typically answer most questions about data quality, however: Requires user investment/specific knowledge to interpret Decision support requires data mastery and time. RADEGO: Saves time by simplifying Risk of Impact of Use and Ownership RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Assessment RADEGO Methodologies Evaluate Method Assumptions: Currency – Accuracy – Risk – Effort – Precision Method Assumptions: Establish Impact of Risk and Frequency of Risk Impact Help departments prioritize layer maintenance scheduling Net effect: determination of staffing required to keep GIS data layers in an Enterprise GIS Data Warehouse up-to-date Scoring of GIS Data simplifies the Risk and Impact of Use and Ownership of a GIS dataset to a 9 point data test. RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Assessment Variables to Assess: Positional Accuracy (Y) Typological Accuracy (Y) Metadata Compliancy (Y) Level of One-Time Maintenance (X) Level of Routine Maintenance (X) Frequency or Rate of Change (X) Automation Capability (X,Y) Combined Impact: (X,Y) Frequency of Use Impact (X) Decision Risk Impact (Y) Scoring represents a dataset’s level of risk/impact to an organization. Scores have both a real world value and a semi-quantitative value (0-20). RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Positional Accuracy United States National Mapping Accuracy (NMAS) Standard of precision based on level of published scale Smaller Scales (< 1:20,000)  <= 1/50 inch error Larger Scales (> 1:20,000)  <=1/30 inch error Planimetric accuracy values for NMAS at common scales: RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Sampling – Positional Accuracy Larger datasets (>1,000 records): NMAS  10% sample size for a dataset Smaller Datasets (< 1,000 records): Statistically significant sample size determined RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Testing – Positional Accuracy Sample Size  Random Grid of Point Test Locations Locations are assessed for accuracy of positional error Pass or Fail  Percentage  RADEGO Score These values will affect the Y or impact axis of the risk matrix. RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Typological Accuracy Accuracy of categorical attributes (i.e. geology, vegetation, flood plain values, etc) Sample tested against a known dataset of field values These values will affect the Y or impact axis of the risk matrix. RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Metadata Compliancy Operationally critical to prevent or avoid risk Metadata assessment is binary Is a dataset’s metadata complete? Is it compliant with SanGIS regional metadata standard? These values will affect the Y or impact axis of the risk matrix. RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Maintenance: One-Time Effort required raise a dataset up-to-date or current Expressed in hours of labor Can involve any level of effort or difficulty to accomplish These values will affect the X or impact axis of the risk matrix. RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Maintenance: Routine Effort required keep a dataset up-to-date or current Expressed in hours of labor per year Can involve any level of effort or difficulty to accomplish These values will affect the X or impact axis of the risk matrix. RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Frequency / Rate of Change Rate of change in a dataset Expressed in time periods: Hours - Months - Years - Never Datasets that represent a unique event in Space or Time: RADEGO Score = 0 (No maintenance / Always Up-to-Date) These values will affect the X or impact axis of the risk matrix. RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Automation Automation matters greatly when determining risk Ideal systems are automated in their maintenance Automation = Reduction in Human Error & Ensures Maintenance These values will affect the X and Y (impact & frequency axis of the risk matrix) RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Combined Impact Score Frequency of Use (rate) & Impact Level of Decision (risk) Shows level of reliance on a dataset by an Organization High impact reflects how critical a dataset is to Dept. Impact Level of Decision affect the (Y) impact axis Rate of Use scores affect the (X) frequency axis Rate of Use (X) Impact Level of Decision (Y) RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Approach – Geodatabase Domains RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

Domains – Coded Values ESRI Geodatabase Domains created with coded integer values reflecting RADEGO Scores for each Assessment Table Schema created with field for each RADEGO Assessment Value and Domains applied to each field Accordingly RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

LUEG–GIS /SanGIS Layers Table of 70 LUEG-GIS SanGIS Responsible layers Merged with RADEGO table schema Assessed by LUEG-GIS Staff based on their specific knowledge Initial Assessment: Does Not include Positional or Typological Accuracy Prioritizes, based on RADEGO Score, which layers should be assessed for:  Accuracy (Positional / Typological) RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

LUEG–GIS /SanGIS Layers RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

LUEG–GIS /SanGIS Layers RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations

RADEGO RADEGO Methodologies Evaluate Method Assumptions: Currency – Accuracy – Risk – Effort – Precision Method Assumptions: Establish Impact of Risk and Frequency of Risk Impact Help departments prioritize layer maintenance scheduling Net effect: determination of staffing required to keep GIS data layers in an Enterprise GIS Data Warehouse up-to-date Scoring of GIS Data simplifies the Risk and Impact of Use and Ownership of a GIS dataset to a 9 point data test. RADEGO: Risk Assessment of Data for Enterprise GIS Operations