S3 Performance of the LIGO Interferometers as Measured by SenseMonitor

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

RECOVERING HARDWARE INJECTIONS IN LIGO S5 DATA Ashley Disbrow Carnegie Mellon University Roy Williams, Michele Vallisneri, Jonah Kanner LIGO SURF 2013.

Advertisements

LIGO-G Z S3/S4 Calibration A cast of thousands… including Peter Fritschel, Gabriela González, Corey Gray, Mike Landry, Greg Mendell, Brian O’Reilly,

A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.

Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.

GWDAW, Dec 2003 Shawhan, Christensen, Gonzalez1 LIGO Inspiral Veto Studies Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech) Nelson Christensen (Carleton College) Gabriela.

1 LIGO-G Z Penn State / LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2003 March 18 Calibration Testing Patrick Sutton, with Michael Landry, Gabriela Gonzalez,

GWDAW /12/16 - G Z1 Report on the First Search for BBH Inspiral Signals on the S2 LIGO Data Eirini Messaritaki University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),

Calibration Accuracy of LIGO Interferometers Brian O’Reilly LIGO Livingston Observatory Rana Adikhari (MIT), Peter Fritschel (MIT), Gabriela Gonzalez(LSU),

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group

1 Time-Domain Calibration Update Xavier Siemens, Mike Landry, Gaby Gonzalez, Brian O’Reilly, Martin Hewitson, Bruce Allen, Jolien Creighton.

8/18/06Gxxxxxx Introduction to Calibration Brian O’Reilly SciMon Camp 2006 Brian O’Reilly SciMon Camp 2006.

Parameter Estimation Using 3.5 post-Newtonian Inspiral Waveforms GWDAW, December 15-18, 2004, Annecy K. Arun, B.R. Iyer, B.S. Sathyaprakash and P. Sundarajan.

Introduction To Signal Processing & Data Analysis

Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis

LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.

Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Detector Characterization of GEO 600 during.

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.

Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.

LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,

TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.

Investigation of discrepancies between Photon calibrator, VCO and Official (coil) calibration techniques Evan Goetz, Rick Savage with Justin Garofoli,

GWDAW12, Dec , Cambridge MA1 Detection Confidence Tests for Burst and Inspiral Candidate Events Romain Gouaty *, for the LSC and the Virgo Collaboration.

6. Results The accompanying histograms show the empirical PDF of z for each interferometer (H1, H2 at Hanford, WA; L1 at Livingston, LA). The green areas.

LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 StrainBandsMon and SixtyHertzMon Keith Riles (University of Michigan)

LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)

LIGO-G DM. Landry – Hanover LSC Meeting, August 18, 2003 LIGO S2 Calibration Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Representing the calibration.

A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data LSC Inspiral Analysis Working Group LIGO-G Z LSC Meeting Andres C. Rodriguez.

Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration Group 8/21/2013.

Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.

LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.

S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.

LIGO-G Z S2 and S3 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the Calibration team Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins.

International Gravitational Wave Network 11/9/2008 Building an Stefan Ballmer, for the LIGO / VIRGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO G

S3: Calibration factors update Two weeks ago: L1 - Comparison with official factors found a problem: Investigating the discrepancy Gaby found an error.

Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg Paul Schwinberg.

May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.

S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.

LIGO-G Z h  AS_Q Filtering in the Time Domain Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech for the Penn State PSURG Group.

Searching for Binary Black Holes with Spin Aligned with Orbital Angular Momentum 1 Deborah L. Hamm – Northern Arizona University LIGO SURF 2013 Mentors:

LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.

LIGO-G Z SenseMonitor Updates for S3 Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1 Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/21/02.

LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization.

LIGO-G Z TFClusters Tuning for the LIGO-TAMA Search Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.

GWDAW91Thursday, December 16 First Comparison Between LIGO &Virgo Inspiral Search Pipelines F. Beauville on behalf of the LIGO-Virgo Joint Working Group.

LIGO-G E S2 Data Quality Investigation John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO.

LIGO-G Z Report on the S2 RunK. Riles / S. Whitcomb 1 Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan) Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech)

LIGO-G Z S5 calibration: time dependent coefficients  Myungkee Sung, Gabriela González, Mike Landry, Brian O’Reilly, Xavier Siemens,…

LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.

Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.

SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.

Gravitational Wave Data Analysis  GW detectors  Signal processing: preparation  Noise spectral density  Matched filtering  Probability and statistics.

Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.

Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane Luke Burks LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration.

Calibration of data in the time domain (or how to generate 1800s long SFTs from time domain data) XS, Bruce Allen, Mike Landry, Soumya Mohanty, Malik.

S2/S3 calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University Plus

From Nothing to Everything BBH and the Next Generation of GW Detectors

WaveMon and Burst FOMs WaveMon WaveMon FOMs Summary & plans

Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)

Towards the first coherent multi-ifo search for NS binaries in LIGO

Line tracking methods used in LineMon

First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1

Burst Figure of Merit Julien Sylvestre LSC Meeting, March 2004

Inspiral Hardware Injections

M Ashley - LSC Meeting – LIGO Hanford, 12 Nov 2003

Calibration: S2 update, S3 preliminaries

Calculation of the phases of injected pulsars from the servo loop

Presentation transcript:

S3 Performance of the LIGO Interferometers as Measured by SenseMonitor Patrick J. Sutton LIGO-Caltech (with thanks to Gaby Gonzalez, Mike Landry, Brian O’Reilly)

Outline SenseMonitor Review S3 Results Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

SenseMonitor SNR-based figure-of-merit monitor for the LIGO IFOs Real-time range estimates: SenseMonitor uses M1 = M2 = 1.4 Mo, r0=8. strain noise angle factor chirp mass SNR threshold inspiral signal Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

Calibration Now a well-oiled machine… Strain related to AS_Q via C, G fixed and measured during “calibration run” a from tracking calibration line b from IFO channels (DARM_GAIN, ICMTRX_01). reference sensing and open-loop gain functions time-dependent gains Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

4-volume scanned (Mpc3yr) S3 Executive Summary IFO 4-volume scanned (Mpc3yr) mean range (Mpc) 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% H1* 27.93 3.77 0.08 2.58 3.28 4.23 6.70 H2 0.32 0.88 0.04 0.81 0.93 1.19 L1 0.25 1.15 0.00 0.89 1.04 1.22 2.06 quartile ranges * includes post-run 12% DC correction for H1 Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

H1 L1 H2 Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

H2 L1 H1 Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

(can be used to recalculate alpha for new reference calibrations) Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17

H1 H2 L1 Sutton LSC@LLO 2004/03/17