Preliminary Findings from the 2008 ISU Faculty Needs Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First-Year Graduate Student Survey INTRODUCTION As part of the Graduate Schools recruitment and retention efforts, a graduate student survey was developed.
Advertisements

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Special Faculty Meeting Faculty Handbook – Section 4 April 10, 2013.
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
A Tale of Two Cities: Comprehensive Assessment of College Student Readiness Paul Gore, Ph.D. University of Utah
MCCVLC Distance Learning Administrators Survey Results & Discussion.
1 Using Factor Analysis to Clarify Operational Constructs for Measuring Mission Perception Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. NEAIR 32 nd Annual Conference November.
Title III Strengthening the Institution Don Staub, Director.
College of Business November 21, Departmental Structure At the present time, no separate departments Previous departmental structure – Management,
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
An Evaluation of SLIS Student Satisfaction and its Global Impacts Christina Hoffman, MLS Dr. Samantha Hastings, Interim Dean The University of North Texas.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate.
WSU SAMPLE  All full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty  All campuses  Response rate: 57.6 % (N=603)  At least 50 % response rate in all colleges.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
Measuring the Gap Between Faculty and Student Perceptions of Engagement: Results from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement University Assessment Office.
Online Course Evaluations Is there a perfect time? Presenters: Cassandra Jones, Ph.D., Director of Assessment Michael Anuszkiewicz, Research Associate.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: A Quick Look at A Few Things that Matter to Faculty Presentation for NC State University Board of Trustees Academic Affairs.
Faculty Survey Highlights University Council Presentation Lynn McCloskey Edward S. Macias April 7, 2008.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
Results of Projected Faculty Life & Work Survey (Pre-course) 19 January 2012 GS 650: Preparing Future Faculty The Graduate School University of Kentucky.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Assessment Activities Presentation for the NC State Assessment Work Group May 2, 2007 Nancy Whelchel, PhD Assistant Director.
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
“Excuse Me Sir, Here’s Your Change”
Faculty Diversity & Work Life Survey Review
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
BGSU’s IDEAL-N Team Dr. Julie Matuga
PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence
Faculty Evaluations: Tenured, Tenure-Track, and Associate
Bringing Active Learning to Scale at Bronx Community College (BCC) of the City University of New York (CUNY) Dr. Nancy Ritze August 3, 2016.
Faculty Workload Model
New Program Director Workshop:
The 2017 Survey of CHIEF ACADEMIC OFFICERS
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
Taia L.C. Reid, Assistant Director of the Peer Educator Program
June 5, 2017 General Track Meeting.
Deanne Snavely, Laura Delbrugge, Tara Johnson, and Edel Reilly
Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System
The 2015 COACHE Survey YORK COLLEGE Faculty Satisfaction
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Conclusion & Implications
Your Institutional Report Step by Step
FIVE YEAR TRENDS FALL FALL 2016
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Findings of the Faculty Campus Climate Survey
Adjunct, newbies, and non-tenure track faculty – oh my!
Hartnell Climate Results
Preparing for Promotion and Annual Review August 22, 2018
Performance Update St. Philip’s College.
Successes and Opportunities
Student Satisfaction Results
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
2018 UNC System employee engagement survey
Select Findings from the Fall 2018 Enrolled Student Survey
SENSE: Survey of New Student Engagement
Committee # 4: Educational Program For The MD
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Training for Reviewers Fall 2018
Faculty Senate President’s Report
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
The Golden Ticket UMBC’s Pre-Orientation Advising Program
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Findings from the 2008 ISU Faculty Needs Assessment Mardell Wilson, Assistant Provost Matt Fuller, Assistant Director of University Assessment

Background FEIC and UAO partnership Participants: All full time faculty teaching a credit generating course in the Fall 2008 Semester whom have opted to participate in campus research N=1021 Survey Instrument Five main constructs: Teaching Research/Creative Expression Service Balancing Personal and Professional Responsibilities Motivation to Participate in Faculty Development

Response Rate 542 valid responses 53.1% Response Rate Representative with 95% confidence For all ISU faculty Rank Tenure status Gender Minority status

Personal and Institutional Importance- Teaching, Research/Creative Expression, & Service

Importance by Tenure Track Status

Support in Growth in Teaching, Research/Creative Expression, & Service 82.1% of respondents agree that they are supported in their growth in teaching at ISU. 62% indicated they were supported in their growth in research/creative expression. 70% agree they were supported in their growth in service at ISU.

Differences by Gender Significant at the p≤0.05, 10-point Scale

Differences by Gender Significant at the p≤0.05, 5-point Scale

Differences by Race Significant at the p≤0.05, 10-point scale

Balance of Personal and Professional Responsibilities 1= 0 hours per week 2= 1-5 hours 3=6-10 hours 4=11-15 hours 5=16-20 hours 6=21-25 hours 7=26-30 hours 8=31-35 hours 9=36-40 hours 10=>40 hours

Balance of Personal & Professional Responsibilities Item Mean Performing household duties during current term 4.10 Preparing for teaching during current term 3.82 Doing administrative or professional work during current term 3.42 Performing childcare duties during current term 3.17 Teaching courses during current term 2.99 Conducting research or creative expression processes during current term 2.93 Writing or disseminating research findings during current term 2.45 Advising students outside of class during current term 2.44 Engaging in department or college committee service during current term 2.23 Providing service to professional/academic organizations or associations 2.04

Discussion Encouraging findings for Importance of, both personal and ISU, regarding Teaching, Research/Creative Expression, & Service. Support is perceived as above average for all three areas; with indication of a key area for attention being Research/Creative Expression. No differences in perceived support between Minority and Caucasian faculty. Teaching is the primary time demand for faculty. Teaching remains a primary focus among our faculty.