Three-dimensional visualization of velocity profiles in the porcine abdominal aortic trifurcation  Erik Morre Pedersen, MD, Jesper Østergaard Hjortdal,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The effect of inguinal lymphatic manipulation on regional lymph flow patterns Jeffrey R. Rubin, MD, Lisa B. Eberlin, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume.
Advertisements

Neonatal thoracoabdominal aortic thrombosis associated with the umbilical artery catheter: Successful management by transaortic thrombectomy  Peter D.
Feasibility of wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms using three- dimensional ultrasound  Annette M. Kok, MSc, V. Lai Nguyen, MD, Lambert.
Aortic injury occurring after minor trauma in ankylosing spondylitis
Prevention of paraplegia during thoracic aortic cross-clamping: Importance of patent internal mammary arteries  Joseph S. Giglia, MD, Gerald B. Zelenock,
Feasibility of transgastric ultrasonography of the abdominal aorta
Computed tomographic angiographic imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Implications for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management  Ron Balm, MD,
Follow-up of renal artery stenosis by duplex ultrasound
Ultrasound measurement of the luminal diameter of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in patients without vascular disease  Ole Martin Pedersen, MD,
The anastomosis angle does change the flow fields at vascular end-to-side anastomoses in vivo  Niels-Henrik Staalsen, MD, Michael Ulrich, MS, Jens Winther,
Jasper W. van Keulen, MD, Frans L. Moll, MD, PhD, Jip L
Richard T. Purdy, M. D. , Frederick C. Beyer, M. D. , William D
Measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms with three-dimensional ultrasound imaging: Preliminary report  Daniel F. Leotta, PhD, Marla Paun, BS, Kirk W.
A new imaging method for assessment of aortic dissection using four-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging  Rachel E. Clough, MBBS, BSc,
Feasibility of wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms using three- dimensional ultrasound  Annette M. Kok, MSc, V. Lai Nguyen, MD, Lambert.
Abdominal aortic pseudoaneurysm after blunt trauma
Initial experience characterizing a type I endoleak from velocity profiles using time- resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI  Thomas A. Hope, MD,
Feasibility of transgastric ultrasonography of the abdominal aorta
Aortic injury occurring after minor trauma in ankylosing spondylitis
Dominik Fleischmann, MDa, Trevor J. Hastie, PhDb, Felix C
David A. Vorp, PhD, M.L. Raghavan, BS, Marshall W. Webster, MD 
Ted R. Kohler, M. D. , R. Eugene Zierler, M. D. , Robert L. Martin, B
Malcolm O. Perry, MD, Richard Kempczinski, MD 
Conformational stress and anastomotic hyperplasia
Rupture of a nonaneurysmal atherosclerotic infrarenal aorta
Renal duplex sonography: Evaluation of clinical utility
Erik E. Swensson, M. D. , Vallee L. Willman, M. D. , Gary J
Turbulence occurring after carotid bifurcation endarterectomy: A harbinger of residual and recurrent carotid stenosis  Dennis F. Bandyk, M.D., Hermann.
Nigel Ackroyd, M. R. C. P. , F. R. C. S. , F. R. A. C. S
Unilateral renal artery revascularization can salvage renal function and terminate dialysis in selected patients with uremia  Enrico Ascer, MD, Mark Gennaro,
Barry J. Doyle, B. Eng, Anthony Callanan, B. Eng, Paul E
In vivo femoropopliteal arterial wall compliance in subjects with and without lower limb vascular disease  Nigel R.M. Tai, FRCS, Alberto Giudiceandrea,
Gregory L. Moneta, MD, Geri Bedford, BA, Kirk Beach, MD, PhD, D
James Majeski, MD, PhD, E. Stanley Crawford, MD, Elizabeth I
In vitro evaluation of multiple arterial stenoses using three-dimensional power Doppler angiography  Zhenyu Guo, PhD, Louis-Gilles Durand, PhD, Louis.
Stanley E. Rittgers, PhD, Mark C.S. Shu, PhD 
Follow-up of renal artery stenosis by duplex ultrasound
Matadial Ojha, PhD, Richard S. C. Cobbold, PhD, K
Arteriovenous fistulas aggravate the hemodynamic effect of vein bypass stenoses: An in vitro study  Tina G. Nielsen, MD, Christian Djurhuus, Erik Morre.
Margruder C. Donaldson, M. D. , William H. Druckemiller, M. D
M. Ojha, PhD, K. W. Johnston, MD, FRCS(C), R. S. C. Cobbold, PhD, R. L
Primary leiomyosarcoma of the abdominal aorta
David C. Taylor, M. D. , Mark D. Kettler, M. D. , Gregory L. Moneta, M
Changes in arterial wall compliance after endovascular stenting
S.Amjad Hussain, MD, FRCSC, Ahmet Bayar, MD 
In vivo three-dimensional blood velocity profile shapes in the human common, internal, and external carotid arteries  Alexey V. Kamenskiy, PhD, Yuris.
Comparison between the transabdominal and retroperitoneal approach for reconstruction of the infrarenal abdominal aorta  Gregorio A. Sicard, M.D., Michael.
Impaired vasodilation of peripheral arteries in response to acetylcholine in human beings with abdominal aortic aneurysm  Kimihiro Komori, MD, PhD, Kyoutaro.
Gregory G. Couch, MASc, K.Wayne Johnston, MD, FRCS, Matadial Ojha, PhD 
Calvin B. Ernst, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
John Hunter—triumph and tragedy
Spontaneous iliac arteriovenous fistula
Spinal cord ischemia following operations on the abdominal aorta
Cardiovascular surgery—The rocket and its stars: Presidential address
Matadial Ojha, PhD. , C. Ross Ethier, PhD. #, K
J.Dennis Baker, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Renal failure after embolization of a prosthetic mitral valve disc and review of systemic disc embolization  Thomas H. Schwarcz, M.D., Laurence H. Coffin,
K. A. Wilson, MSc, P. R. Hoskins, PhD, A. J. Lee, PhD, F. G. R
Septic embolism complicating infective endocarditis
Seizures following subclavian-carotid bypass
Studies by pulsed Doppler ultrasonography of velocity fields downstream of graded stenoses on the abdominal aorta in pigs  W.Yong Kim, MD, Erik M. Pedersen,
Monitoring vascular surgical performance
D. Emerick Szilagyi, MD—An appreciation
George D. Lilly 1906–1988 Journal of Vascular Surgery
James A. DeWeese, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Left subclavian artery aneurysm: Two cases of rare congenital etiology
Samuel S. Ahn, MD, Robert B. Rutherford, MD, K
Christopher K. Zarins, M. D. , Michael A. Zatina, M. D. , Don P
Endovascular repair of two abdominal aortic aneurysms
Cornelius A. Sullivan, MD, Michael J. Rohrer, MD, Bruce S. Cutler, MD 
Presentation transcript:

Three-dimensional visualization of velocity profiles in the porcine abdominal aortic trifurcation  Erik Morre Pedersen, MD, Jesper Østergaard Hjortdal, MD, Vibeke Elisabeth Hjortdal, MD, Hans Nygaard, ME, Michael Hasenkam, MD, DMSc, Peter Kildeberg Paulsen, MD, DMSc  Journal of Vascular Surgery  Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 194-204 (January 1992) DOI: 10.1016/0741-5214(92)70028-J Copyright © 1992 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Analysis set-up. The hot-film anemometer velocity signal from one of 21 points is recorded along with the ECG. The added velocity signal and ECG derived trigger signal is A/D-converted, and ensemble averaged. A three-dimensional graphic presentation of the cross-sectional velocity profile is then plotted at different times throughout the cardiac cycle. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1992 15, 194-204DOI: (10.1016/0741-5214(92)70028-J) Copyright © 1992 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Anatomy of the aortic trifurcation and positions of measurement. On the left the posterior-concave curvature of the abdominal aorta is visualized. The circles indicate the plane and terminology used to describe the positions in the vessels. M, Medial; L, lateral; A, anterior; P, posterior; E, left; R, right; Di, distal; and Pr, proximal iliac position of measurement. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1992 15, 194-204DOI: (10.1016/0741-5214(92)70028-J) Copyright © 1992 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Velocity signals. a, Disturbed velocity signals in two measurement series from the center of the abdominal aorta 3 cm proximal to the trifurcation. b, Shifts in tangent direction indicating retrograde velocities (arrows) at vessel walls in the abdominal aorta. The triphasic electromagnetic flow meter signal below. c, Velocity, signals measured in iliac branch, proximal position. Arrows indicate retrograde flow. P, posterior; A, anterior; L, lateral; M, medial. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1992 15, 194-204DOI: (10.1016/0741-5214(92)70028-J) Copyright © 1992 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Measurements from the abdominal aorta. a, Diameter velocity profile through the entire heart cycle. b, peak velocity profiles for all measurements series in four diameters visualized in circles (A, Anterior; P, posterior; E, left; R, right. A-P profiles based on nine points of measurement, other profiles on five. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1992 15, 194-204DOI: (10.1016/0741-5214(92)70028-J) Copyright © 1992 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Measurements in the proximal iliac position (see Fig. 2), Repeak = 641, α-parameter = 14, branch-trunk area ratio (β) = 0.95, lateral angle (θ) = 155 degrees. a, Cross-sectional three-dimensional plots. The time in heart cycle is shown at the left of each figure. b, One-diameter profiles through the entire heart cycle. c, Peak velocity profiles in four diameters shown in circles, A, Anterior; P, posterior; L, lateral; M, medial. L-M profiles based on nine measuring points, the other profiles based on five. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1992 15, 194-204DOI: (10.1016/0741-5214(92)70028-J) Copyright © 1992 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Influence of pulse rate variability. On the diametral velocity profile (a) the point of measurement in the center (cross hatched) is seen to be out of phase with the other velocity signals, having a pulse rate 11% higher than the other velocity signals. The cross-sectional velocity profile (b) and the L-M diameter profile (c) from the time corresponding to the instant marked on the diametral velocity profile (a) are shown for comparison. A, Anterior; P, posterior; L, lateral; M, medial. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1992 15, 194-204DOI: (10.1016/0741-5214(92)70028-J) Copyright © 1992 Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery Terms and Conditions