Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Advertisements

Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Federica Bertocchini, Claudio D. Stern  Developmental Cell 
Hidehiko Inomata, Tomoko Haraguchi, Yoshiki Sasai  Cell 
Regulation of Wnt Signaling by Sox Proteins
Iain Patten, Marysia Placzek  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Shouwen Wang, Marie Krinks, Keming Lin, Frank P Luyten, Malcolm Moos 
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
Distinct Origins of Adult and Embryonic Blood in Xenopus
The Neural Plate Specifies Somite Size in the Xenopus laevis Gastrula
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Rspo3 Binds Syndecan 4 and Induces Wnt/PCP Signaling via Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis to Promote Morphogenesis  Bisei Ohkawara, Andrei Glinka, Christof.
Anne-Hélène Monsoro-Burq, Estee Wang, Richard Harland 
Distinct PAR-1 Proteins Function in Different Branches of Wnt Signaling during Vertebrate Development  Olga Ossipova, Sangeeta Dhawan, Sergei Sokol, Jeremy.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages e6 (October 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 18, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
RAPGEF5 Regulates Nuclear Translocation of β-Catenin
SoxE Factors Function Equivalently during Neural Crest and Inner Ear Development and Their Activity Is Regulated by SUMOylation  Kimberly M. Taylor, Carole.
Canonical Wnt Signaling Dynamically Controls Multiple Stem Cell Fate Decisions during Vertebrate Body Formation  Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental.
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Neural and Head Induction by Insulin-like Growth Factor Signals
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2005)
Depletion of Three BMP Antagonists from Spemann's Organizer Leads to a Catastrophic Loss of Dorsal Structures  Mustafa K. Khokha, Joanna Yeh, Timothy.
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
BMP Signaling Protects Telencephalic Fate by Repressing Eye Identity and Its Cxcr4- Dependent Morphogenesis  Holger Bielen, Corinne Houart  Developmental.
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 91, Issue 3, Pages (October 1997)
Intrinsic Differences between the Superficial and Deep Layers of the Xenopus Ectoderm Control Primary Neuronal Differentiation  Andrew D Chalmers, David.
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Cell Cycle Control of Wnt Receptor Activation
Regulation of ADMP and BMP2/4/7 at Opposite Embryonic Poles Generates a Self- Regulating Morphogenetic Field  Bruno Reversade, E.M. De Robertis  Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
Wnt/Frizzled Activation of Rho Regulates Vertebrate Gastrulation and Requires a Novel Formin Homology Protein Daam1  Raymond Habas, Yoichi Kato, Xi He 
Vangl2 Promotes Wnt/Planar Cell Polarity-like Signaling by Antagonizing Dvl1-Mediated Feedback Inhibition in Growth Cone Guidance  Beth Shafer, Keisuke.
Volume 12, Issue 22, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Xsox17α and -β Mediate Endoderm Formation in Xenopus
Stat3 Controls Cell Movements during Zebrafish Gastrulation
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 120, Issue 2, Pages (January 2005)
Huiqiang Lu, Jun Ma, Yun Yang, Wenchao Shi, Lingfei Luo 
E2a Is Necessary for Smad2/3-Dependent Transcription and the Direct Repression of lefty during Gastrulation  Andrea E. Wills, Julie C. Baker  Developmental.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
The miR-430/427/302 Family Controls Mesendodermal Fate Specification via Species- Specific Target Selection  Alessandro Rosa, Francesca M. Spagnoli, Ali.
Wei Wu, Andrei Glinka, Hajo Delius, Christof Niehrs  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Lyle B Zimmerman, José M De Jesús-Escobar, Richard M Harland  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Norihito Kishimoto, Ying Cao, Alice Park, Zhaoxia Sun 
A Vertebrate Homolog of the Cell Cycle Regulator Dbf4 Is an Inhibitor of Wnt Signaling Required for Heart Development  Barbara K. Brott, Sergei Y. Sokol 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Lefty-Dependent Inhibition of Nodal- and Wnt-Responsive Organizer Gene Expression Is Essential for Normal Gastrulation  William W. Branford, H.Joseph.
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Morphogenetic Movements Underlying Eye Field Formation Require Interactions between the FGF and ephrinB1 Signaling Pathways  Kathryn B. Moore, Kathleen.
A Mechanism for Wnt Coreceptor Activation
Zhen Zhang, Jamie M. Verheyden, John A. Hassell, Xin Sun 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 719-730 (March 2015) Notum Is Required for Neural and Head Induction via Wnt Deacylation, Oxidation, and Inactivation  Xinjun Zhang, Seong-Moon Cheong, Nathalia G. Amado, Alice H. Reis, Bryan T. MacDonald, Matthias Zebisch, E. Yvonne Jones, Jose Garcia Abreu, Xi He  Developmental Cell  Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 719-730 (March 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.014 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2015 32, 719-730DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Notum Antagonizes Wnt Signaling in Mammalian Cells and Xenopus Embryos (A) Notum inhibited TOPFLASH induced by Wnt3a in HEK293T cells. Increasing doses of a Notum expression vector were co-transfected with an expression vector for Wnt3a. (B) Notum inhibited TOPFLASH induced by the recombinant WNT3A protein. HEK293T cells transfected with increasing doses of the Notum expression vector were incubated with the WNT3A protein. (C) Notum(S239A) lacked the ability to inhibit TOPFLASH induced by the WNT3A protein. (D) Notum inhibited axis duplication induced by Xenopus Wnt8, but not β-catenin, while Notum(S239A) did not inhibit axis duplication induced by either Wnt8 or β-catenin. n, embryos examined. (E–I) Notum in animal pole explants inhibited expression of Xnr3 induced by Wnt8 (E), but not by β-catenin (F), nor did it inhibit Xbra expression induced by Nodal/Xnr1 (G), or bFGF (H), or Vent2 expression induced by BMP4 (I). EF1α, a loading control; uninjected embryos, uninj.; whole embryos, WE; whole embryos without the reverse transcriptase, -RT. There were two doses of Notum mRNA that were injected. Error bars (A–C) represent SD of triplicated experiments. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2015 32, 719-730DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Notum Causes Wnt Deacylation and Inactivation (A) The Wnt3a protein modified by Notum became hydrophilic in the Triton X-114 detergent-aqueous phase separation assay. Wnt3a from mock or Notum(S239A)-expressing cells was hydrophobic and partitioned in the detergent (De) phase, but Wnt3a from Notum- or Notum-TM-expressing cells partitioned in the aqueous (Aq) phase; total input, T. (B) Wnt3a CM from Notum- or Notum-TM-expressing cells was inactive and induced minimal phosphorylation of LRP6 and Dvl2 in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells, whereas Wnt3a CM from mock, Notum(S239A)-, or Notum(S239A)-TM-expressing cells induced phosphorylation of LRP6 and Dvl2. Note that Wnt3a from Notum- or Notum-TM-expressing cells exhibited slightly faster migration. WCL, whole cell lysates. (C) Wnt3a CM from Notum or Notum-TM-expressing cells induced minimal TOPFLASH in HEK293T cells, whereas Wnt3a CM from mock, Notum(S239A)-, or Notum(S239A)-TM-expressing cells induced TOPFLASH. Error bars represent SD of triplicated experiments. (D) Wnt3a secreted from Notum-expressing cells exhibited minimal binding to mFz8CRD-IgG, whereas Wnt3a secreted from mock or Notum(S239A)-expressing cells exhibited binding. (E) Notum, but not Notum(S239A), reduced Wnt3a acylation when they were co-expressed in HEK293T cells. See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2015 32, 719-730DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Notum Is Likely a Wnt Deacylase Acting Extracellularly and Causes Wnt3a and Wnt5a to Form Oxidized Oligomers (A) Notum had minimal effects on hydrophobicity of Wnt3a from WCL in the detergent-aqueous phase separation assay. (B) Recombinant WNT3A proteins lost hydrophobicity after incubation with Notum-expressing cells. (C) Notum reduced Wnt3a acylation in vitro. Purified metabolically labeled Wnt3a protein was incubated with mock, purified Notum, or Notum(S239A) proteins. (D) Wnt3a secreted from Notum-, but not Notum(S239A)-, expressing cells formed oxidized oligomer. Wnt3a CM from mock, Notum-, or Notum(S239A)-expressing cells was analyzed by non-reducing or reducing SDS-PAGE. Wnt3a monomers and oxidized oligomers were labeled by an arrow and asterisk, respectively. (E) Recombinant WNT3A proteins formed oxidized oligomers upon incubation with Notum-, but not mock or Notum(S239A)-,expressing cells. (F) Wnt5a proteins secreted from Notum-expressing cells formed oxidized oligomers. See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2015 32, 719-730DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Notum Expression Patterns during Xenopus Embryogenesis (A and B) RT-PCR revealed that Notum is maternally and zygotically expressed throughout Xenopus embryogenesis (A), and is enriched animally and dorsally at stage 10.5; animal caps, AC; dorsal marginal zone, DMZ; ventral marginal zone, VMZ; vegetal caps, VC; a pan-mesodermal marker, Xbra; a dorsal marker, Chordin; an animal and ventral marker, Msx1. (C–T) Whole mount in situ hybridization for Notum/Notum’ expression, showing lateral view at 4-cell and stage 6.5 (C and D); lateral and bisected view at stage 8.5 (E and F); bisected view at stage 9.5 (G); lateral and bisected view at stage 10.5, with dorsal on right (H and I); dorsal and bisected view at the stage 11 (J and K); with an enlarged anterior view showing stronger expression anteriorly (L); dorso-anterior (M); dorsal (N, anterior on top); and cross-section (O, dorsal on top; and P, an enlarged view) at stage 15; lateral view at the tail bud stage (Q); with an enlarged anterior view indicating expression in the cement gland (R, arrow); lateral view at the early tadpole stage (S); and with an enlarged view indicating expression in the pronephros region (T, arrowhead). The blue color at the blastocoel surface in bisections was non-specific. See also Figure S3. Developmental Cell 2015 32, 719-730DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Notum Is Required for Anterior Development in Xenopus Embryos (A and B) Dorsal injection of Notum mRNA, but not Notum(S239A), induced an enlarged head similar to that induced by Tiki1 mRNA, and resulting phenotypes were tabulated. (C) The Notum MO and the Notum’ MO inhibited protein synthesis from Xenopus Notum (xNotum) or Notum’ (xNotum’), but not mouse Notum (mNotum) mRNA. Co, MO, and MO’ indicate control MO and MOs against xNotum and xNotum’, respectively. (D and E) Dorso-animal injection of the two Notum MOs together caused anterior defects that were rescued by mNotum mRNA, and resulting phenotypes were tabulated. (F) The Notum MOs suppressed expression of forebrain markers Otx2 and Bf1 and a hindbrain marker Krox20 at stage 17. See also Table S1. (G) Illustration of the MO-injected A1 and B1 blastomeres at 32-cell stage and their descendent tissues at stage 10.5. (H) The Notum MOs injected into the A1 blastomeres caused anterior defects in more embryos (69%) than those injected into the B1 blastomeres (22%). See also Figures S4 and S5; Tables S2 and S3. Developmental Cell 2015 32, 719-730DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Notum Is Required for Neural Induction in Embryos and Animal Explants (A) The Notum MOs reduced the expression domain of Sox2, a pan-neural marker, and expanded the expression domain of cytokeratin, an epidermal marker, and the reciprocal changes were rescued by mNotum, but not mNutum(S239A), mRNA. See also Table S4. (B) The Notum MOs suppressed expression of neural markers induced by injection of the Chordin mRNA and restored cytokeratin expression that were inhibited by Chordin. The effect of Notum MOs was rescued by mNotum, but not mNotum(S239A), mRNA; a cement gland marker, XAG; anterior neural markers, Bf1 and Pax6; a pan-neural marker, Sox2; a neuronal marker, N-tubulin; an epidermal marker, Keratin; a mesodermal marker, M-Actin; and a loading control, ODC. (C) Chordin induced Bf1 and Sox2 expression when the Notum MOs and a β-catenin MO were co-injected. (D) Injection of Notum mRNA, like that of Chordin mRNA, induced expression of neural markers Sox2 and Pax6 and suppressed that of an epidermal marker, cytokeratin, in animal cap explants. See also Figure S6. Developmental Cell 2015 32, 719-730DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.014) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions