Soft robotic VAD concept.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Principle of asymmetric lengthening of tip enables active steering.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Force limits and layout design.

A battery-free microorigami robotic arm.

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Deployment of the septal anchoring system.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

Robot surface tension experiments.

TPAD training protocol.

Implant surgery. Implant surgery. (A) Suturing of rings to the esophagus. (B) A silicone sheet is inserted behind the esophagus, and the implant is connected.

Fabrication of bilayer actuator composed of a hygroscopically active layer with aligned nanofibers and an inactive layer. Fabrication of bilayer actuator.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Gripper that grasps autonomously.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Principle of asymmetric lengthening of tip enables active steering.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Force limits and layout design.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.

SoFi system overview. SoFi system overview. (Top, left to right) Soft robotic fish and diver interface module. (Bottom, left to right) Subcomponents of.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Translation of a spherical object.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.

Fig. 3 Rotation experiment, setup.

Deployment of the septal anchoring system.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Universal soft robotic activation based on reversible assembly.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Growth enables a soft robot to move its tip through constrained environments and to form 3D structures defined by the path of its tip. Growth enables a.

Details of seal design. Details of seal design. (A) RAD sampler (left), with close-up view (right) indicating the soft edges that form the light seal.

Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.

Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. (A)

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Presentation transcript:

Soft robotic VAD concept. Soft robotic VAD concept. (A) Section view illustration showing the soft robotic device principle of operation on the right side of the heart in diastole (left) and systole (right; outermost central actuator is removed here for illustrative purposes). (B) Photograph of the soft robotic device during in vivo operation on the RV in diastole (the red object is the standard surgical tourniquet used to tension the purse string suture that retains the sealing ring in the ventricle wall). (C) Photograph of the device on the RV in systole. (D) Annotated photograph of the device implementation for the RV. Christopher J. Payne et al. Sci. Robotics 2017;2:eaan6736 Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works