European Urology Oncology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Advertisements

Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Results of Targeted Biopsy in Men with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions Classified Equivocal, Likely or Highly Likely to Be Clinically Significant Prostate.
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Testosterone Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Heterogeneous Flare in Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Tracer Uptake with Initiation of Androgen Pathway Blockade in Metastatic.
European Urology Oncology
Yair Lotan, Peter C. Black, Laura Caba, Sam S. Chang, Michael S
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
European Urology Oncology
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
European Urology Oncology
Towards Early and More Specific Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal.
Prostate Cancer Detection: A View of the Future
Ongoing Gleason Grade Migration in Localized Prostate Cancer and Implications for Use of Active Surveillance  Adam B. Weiner, Ruth Etzioni, Scott E. Eggener 
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Identification, Management, and Outcomes
European Urology Oncology
Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions  Anwar R. Padhani, Jeffrey Weinreb, Andrew.
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients  Timo F.W. Soeterik,
Luis Martínez-Piñeiro  European Urology Supplements 
Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Cancer and Skeletal Metastases  Axel Heidenreich, Nicola Fossati, David Pfister, Nazareno Suardi,
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer  Valeria.
European Urology Oncology
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Is It Necessary to Detect All Prostate Cancers in Men with Serum PSA Levels
Selma Masic, Janet E. Cowan, Samuel L. Washington, Hao G
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Detected via Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography  Andrew.
European Urology Oncology
Heterogeneity in Definitions of High-risk Prostate Cancer and Varying Impact on Mortality Rates after Radical Prostatectomy  Matthew Mossanen, Kenneth.
European Urology Oncology
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages (April 2019)
Jonathan S. Brajtbord, Michael S. Leapman, Matthew R. Cooperberg 
Development and Validation of an Improved Pathological Nodal Staging System for Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder  Devin N. Patel, Michael Luu, Zachary.
Psychotherapeutic Interventions Targeting Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature  Liliana Vartolomei, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Mihai.
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
A Prognostic Model to Predict Mortality among Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients in the U.S. Military Health System  Jie Lin, PhD, MPH, Corey A. Carter,
Preventing Osteoporosis in Men Taking Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis  Joseph Sargon Joseph, Vincent.
European Urology Oncology
The Cost to Medicare of Bladder Cancer Care
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy  Neal Patel, Eliza Cricco-Lizza,
European Urology Oncology
Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection.
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
European Urology Oncology
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
Oncoforum Urology: Prostate Cancer 2008 at a Glance
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Salvage Local Treatments After Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Assessing a Patient’s Individual Risk of Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer: Be Aware of Case Mix Heterogeneity and A Priori Likelihood  Jan F.M. Verbeek,
European Urology Oncology
Presentation transcript:

European Urology Oncology Multi-institutional Clinical Tool for Predicting High-risk Lesions on 3Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging  Matthew Truong, Janet E. Baack Kukreja, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Nimrod S. Barashi, Bokai Wang, Zachary Nuffer, Ji Hae Park, Khoa Lam, Thomas P. Frye, Jeffrey W. Nix, John V. Thomas, Changyong Feng, Brian F. Chapin, John W. Davis, Gary Hollenberg, Aytekin Oto, Scott E. Eggener, Jean V. Joseph, Eric Weinberg, Edward M. Messing  European Urology Oncology  DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.008 Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Development and validation of the BiRCH models. Statistical methods included logistic regression analysis (LRA) and support vector machine (SVM), a machine learning technique. mpMRI=multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; PCa=prostate cancer. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.008) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Calibration and decision curve analysis. (A) Calibration curves for BiRCH LRA 1&2 and BiRCH LRA 3. The diagonal solid line represents ideal predictions. The dotted line represents actual predictions. (B) Decision analysis curves for BiRCH LRA 1&2 and BiRCH LRA 3 PCa compared with PSA. The gray line is the benefit of performing mpMRI on all patients, and the horizontal line is the benefit of performing mpMRI on none. A high standardized net benefit across a wide range of probabilities was observed when applied to patients within indications 1 and 2. A net benefit was observed only at high probabilities within indication 3, and thus the BiRCH models are not clinically useful for active surveillance patients. LRA=logistic regression analysis; mpMRI=multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; PCa=prostate cancer; PSA=prostate-specific antigen. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.008) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Web-based BiRCH machine learning tool (http://birch.azurewebsites.net/). CY=computed tomography; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; PIRADS=Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PSA=prostate-specific antigen; SVM=support vector machine. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.008) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions