PDGFRA Is Not Essential for the Derivation and Maintenance of Mouse Extraembryonic Endoderm Stem Cell Lines  Jiangwei Lin, Mona Khan, Bolek Zapiec, Peter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 143, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Advertisements

GCN5 Regulates FGF Signaling and Activates Selective MYC Target Genes during Early Embryoid Body Differentiation  Li Wang, Evangelia Koutelou, Calley.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 5-14 (July 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Reprogramming after Chromosome Transfer into Mouse Blastomeres
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Identification of Bone Marrow-Derived Soluble Factors Regulating Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration  Tsung-Lin Tsai, Wan-Ju Li  Stem Cell.
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Jurian Schuijers, Laurens G. van der Flier, Johan van Es, Hans Clevers 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Genome Transfer Prevents Fragmentation and Restores Developmental Potential of Developmentally Compromised Postovulatory Aged Mouse Oocytes  Mitsutoshi.
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages e6 (June 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 1-3 (July 2018)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Robust Self-Renewal of Rat Embryonic Stem Cells Requires Fine-Tuning of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Inhibition  Yaoyao Chen, Kathryn Blair, Austin Smith 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 95, Issue 3, Pages (October 1998)
Early Lineage Segregation between Epiblast and Primitive Endoderm in Mouse Blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK Pathway  Claire Chazaud, Yojiro Yamanaka,
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Jamie A. Hackett, Toshihiro Kobayashi, Sabine Dietmann, M. Azim Surani 
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Reprogramming Roadblocks Are System Dependent
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Nanog Cell Volume 113, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Overexpression of Trophoblast Stem Cell-Enriched MicroRNAs Promotes Trophoblast Fate in Embryonic Stem Cells  Ursula Nosi, Fredrik Lanner, Tsu Huang,
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Activin Signals through SMAD2/3 to Increase Photoreceptor Precursor Yield during Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation  Amy Q. Lu, Evgenya Y. Popova, Colin.
H1foo Has a Pivotal Role in Qualifying Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Ismail Osman, Jun Wei Pek  Stem Cell Reports 
Naive and Primed Pluripotent States
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Efficient gene transfer into the epithelial cell layer of embryonic mouse intestine using low-voltage electroporation  Helen E. Abud, Peter Lock, Joan.
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (September 2018)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Samantha A. Morris, Yu Guo, Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz  Cell Reports 
Nanog-Independent Reprogramming to iPSCs with Canonical Factors
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages e7 (June 2019)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Derivation of Mouse Haploid Trophoblast Stem Cells
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2019)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (September 2019)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2019)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Yasuhiro Yamada, Hitomi Aoki, Takahiro Kunisada, Akira Hara 
Presentation transcript:

PDGFRA Is Not Essential for the Derivation and Maintenance of Mouse Extraembryonic Endoderm Stem Cell Lines  Jiangwei Lin, Mona Khan, Bolek Zapiec, Peter Mombaerts  Stem Cell Reports  Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 1062-1070 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.005 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Post-XEN Cell Lines Derived from PDGFRA-Deficient Postimplantation Embryos (A) Post-XEN cell line X-E6.5-79642-8 derived from a PDGFRA-deficient E6.5 embryo. (B) Genotyping results. Positive control: genomic DNA from the tail of a PDGFRA-GFP heterozygous mouse. B6: genomic DNA from the tail of a C57BL/6J mouse. Red, PDGFRA-GFP homozygous XEN cell lines. (C) PDGFRA-deficient post-XEN cell line X-E6.5-79642-8. First column, PDGFRA-GFP∗: intrinsic green fluorescence of GFP expressed from the gene-targeted Pdgfra locus. Second and third columns: immunofluorescence for GATA4, GATA6, SOX7, SOX17, DAB2, OCT4, NANOG, and CDX2. Fourth column: DAPI nuclear strain. (D and E) X-E6.5-79642-1 is immunoreactive for PDGFRA (D), and X-E6.5-79642-8 is negative (E). Stem Cell Reports 2017 9, 1062-1070DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.005) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ES and Pre-XEN Cell Lines Derived from PDGFRA-Deficient Blastocysts (A) ESC line ES-111 derived from a PDGFRA-deficient blastocyst. GFP+ cells are rare on day 50. (B) Pre-XEN cell line X-ICM-97025-4 derived from a PDGFRA-deficient ICM. (C) Genotyping results. Positive control: genomic DNA from the tail of a PDGFRA-GFP heterozygous mouse. Red: PDGFRA-GFP homozygous cell lines. (D) X-ICM-97025-4. First column, PDGFRA-GFP∗: intrinsic green fluorescence of GFP. Second and third columns: immunofluorescence for GATA4, GATA6, SOX17, DAB2, OCT4, and CDX2. Fourth column: DAPI nuclear stain (blue). (E and F) X116 is immunoreactive for PDGFRA (E), and X-ICM-97025-4 is immunonegative (F). Stem Cell Reports 2017 9, 1062-1070DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.005) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 cXEN Cell Lines Converted Chemically from ESC Lines (A) Conversion of ESC-18 (PDGFRA-GFP heterozygous) and ESC-23 (PDGFRA-deficient) into cXEN cells in TS medium with F4H, 0.01 μM RA, and 10 ng/mL Activin A, or F4H as control. Insets for ESC-18 and ESC-23 in control condition show that there are no GFP+ cells on day 3. (B) Immunofluorescence on PDGFRA-deficient cXEN-23 cells converted from ESC-23. First column, PDGFRA-GFP∗: intrinsic green fluorescence of GFP. Second and third columns: immunofluorescence for GATA4, GATA6, SOX7, SOX17, DAB2, OCT4, NANOG, and CDX2. Fourth column, DAPI. (C and D) cXEN-18 is immunoreactive for PDGFRA (C), and cXEN-23 is not (D). Stem Cell Reports 2017 9, 1062-1070DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.005) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cell Growth, NanoString Gene Expression Analysis, and Chimeric Embryos (A) Heatmap NanoString analysis of one PDGFRA-GFP heterozygous ESC line (ESC-18), two PDGFRA-deficient ESC lines (ESC-23, ESC-111), five PDGFRA-GFP heterozygous XEN cell lines (X-E6.5-82053-1, X-E6.5-79642-1, X-E6.5-79642-4, X-E6.5-79637-1, and cXEN-18), and four PDGFRA-deficient XEN cell lines (X-E6.5-79642-8, X-E6.5-79637-6, cXEN-23, and cXEN-111). The PDGFRA-deficient cell lines are indicated in red. Heatmap colors correspond to log10 values of normalized counts as indicated in the color key, from dark blue (low) to dark orange (high). (B) Cell proliferation: a.u. (arbitrary units), difference between days 4 and 1. n.s., not significant (t test). Line at mean, error bars at SD. Six cell lines were used for each of the two genotypes, representing six biological replicates per genotype. Three technical replicates per cell line were seeded and measured on a daily basis for 4 days. (C–E) PDGFRA-deficient post-XEN cell line X-E6.5-79642-8. A whole mount of an E7.5 chimeric embryo was imaged in bright field and fluorescence (C) and in fluorescence (D), using a Nikon SMZ25 stereofluorescence microscope. The same embryo was imaged using a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope (E). (F–H) PDGFRA-deficient pre-XEN cell line X-ICM-97025-4. A whole mount of an E7.5 chimeric embryo was imaged in bright field and fluorescence (F) using a Nikon SMZ25, and in fluorescence alone (G), with DAPI (blue) and GFP (green), using a Zeiss LSM 710. A section of the decidua of another E7.5 embryo, showing the merged image of fluorescence from DAPI, GFP, and F-actin (red), was imaged using a Zeiss LSM 710 (H). Stem Cell Reports 2017 9, 1062-1070DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.005) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions