Contribution for the updating of the WFD reporting sheets and schemas

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Comparison of Environmental Quality Objectives, Threshold Values or Water Quality Targets set for the Demands of European Water Framework Directive Ulrich.

Advertisements

CIS SSG Climate Change and Water – 5 September Activities for first RBMP Information exchange on a climate check of the first Programme of Measures.

Water.europa.eu Assessment River Basin Management Plans CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting Brussels, May 2011 Marieke van Nood WFD Team DG.

Water.europa.eu Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group Update as of Marco Gasparinetti, DG ENV.D.1, European Commission.

Eurostat Ag.no "Annex 2" supplement to Eurostat Annual Report, October 2015 Working Group on Article 64 and Article 65 of the Staff Regulations Meeting.

Eurojust cases involving crimes against children

EU Water Framework Directive

EU Water Framework Directive

Ag.no. 15 Lessons from the 2015 A65 exercise

No document Ag 08 ESA2010 (SNA 2008)

2.1. ESS Agreement on Learning Mobility (IVET & Youth)

Ex-ante evaluation: major points and state of play

Water Directors’ Meeting State of transposition and implementation

State of legal transposition (1)

Commission activities Water Directors meeting November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.

Ag.no.16 A65 country manuals and country assessments

3C. Update of Summary of WISE electronic delivery

Update on the status of RBMP reporting

Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation

Report on WISE Art.8 and GIS issues

Habides update (May 2011).

State of play Article 5 reports

Education and Training Statistics Working Group

1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.

EU Water Framework Directive

on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group

MSFD Article 12 assessment Follow-up on geographic issues

Representative sampling questionnaire

Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation

ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF GENDER EQUALITY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Update on RBMP&FRMP adoption and reporting Assessment of RBMP&FRMP

Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group

2a. Status of WFD reporting

2b. Status of WFD reporting

Programme adoptions Cohesion Policy:

ETS Working Group meeting 24-25/9/2007 Agenda point 7 CVTS3 brief update /09/ 2007 ETS working group.

Summary of WISE electronic delivery

Commission activities

Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Transposition and Implementation

Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group

2nd European Water Conference, Brussels, 2-3 April 2009 Active Involvement in River Basin Management – Plunge into the debate!

Update on the status of RBMP reporting

Summary of WISE electronic delivery

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

Draft topic report on WS&D aspects in a selection of EU RBMPs

LAMAS Working Group 7 – 8 December 2016

WFD River Basin Management Plans :

3.6. Impact of population and housing census results on population stocks and on LFS and SILC–follow-up DSS Meeting September 2012.

Comparison of methodologies for defining Good Ecological Potential

EU Water Framework Directive

Update on legal issues Strategic Co-ordination Group 7-8 May 2009

Urban Audit Results of the quality project

Legal and implementation issues update

Water scarcity & droughts

State of Play RBMPs and WISE reporting (9/07/10)

Update on implementation WG F 27 April 2010 Maria Brättemark

Follow up questionnaire

Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group 23 February 2010

Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group

Update on status of reporting and validation process

Point 2a - UWWTD implementation - 5th Commission Synthesis Report

The 1997 UN Watercourses Convention

Doc.A6465/16/03 Ag.no.16 A65 country manuals

LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2016

Doc.A6465/14/04 Ag.16 A65 country manuals

LAMAS Working Group June 2015

European waters - assessment of status and pressures 2018

DG Environment, Unit C.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

2. WFD implementation: state of play

Presentation transcript:

Contribution for the updating of the WFD reporting sheets and schemas DG ENV Jorge Rodríguez Romero

Background 2010 reporting exercise for first RBMP Based on CIS reporting guidance nb 21 Success: all MS reported in WISE Important effort for MS report and for COM to assess Next reporting March 2016

Objective Simplify as much as possible retaining the value for the purpose Clarify reporting agreements where needed Review contents where proved necessary Maintain as much as possible back compatibility

Triggers for review The contents are not fit for purpose (e.g. relevance, level of aggregation) The contents are unclear or too complicated, not sufficiently straightforward to produce a clear report The contents are relevant but the schemas are too complex The contents are relevant but comparability is low The contents are relevant but information has not been reported by most Member States

5. The contents are relevant but information has not been reported Some information may not be available (gaps in knowledge / implementation) Pollutants loads Groundwater dependent ecosystems GWB for which there are directly dependant terrestrial ecosystems at country level Country Number BG 14 CY 1 EE 2 EL 25 ES 18 FR 54 HU 56 IE 72 IT 195 LT 20 LV 19 MT NL 21

4. The contents are relevant but comparability is low Rivers: Number and percentage of water bodies subject to each significant pressure No Pressures Point Source Diffuse Source Water Abstraction Water flow regulations and morphological alterations River management Country Nb (%) AT 2762 37,63 59 0,8 1202 16,38 40 0,55 4105 55,93 BE 82 46,33 177 100 12 6,78 139 78,53 BG 153 22,24 243 35,32 295 42,88 149 21,66 87 12,65 72 10,47 CY 102 47,22 43 19,91 104 48,15 38 17,59 7 3,24 CZ 5,52 485 45,37 559 52,29 704 65,86 229 21,42 DE 722 7,96 2629 28,97 6899 76,03 182 2,01 7744 85,34 EE 458 71,01 79 12,25 11,16 19 2,95 89 13,8 EL 693 67,09 13,46 300 29,04 62 6 1 0,1 ES 2273 52,91 1430 33,29 1114 25,93 761 17,71 817 19,02 479 11,15 FI 1090 68,04 132 8,24 418 26,09 3 0,19 125 7,8 180 11,24 FR 3686 34,05 3198 29,55 4226 39,04 2223 20,54 2798 25,85 3134 28,95 HU 4,95 20,37 261 30,03 10,24 516 59,38 808 92,98 IE 4213 92,27 353 7,73 210 4,6 343 7,51 IT 2953 38,63 2438 31,89 2973 38,89 1345 17,6 605 7,91 880 11,51 LT 374 46,06 63 7,76 223 27,46 0,12 28 3,45 195 24,01 LU LV 93 17 8,29 29 14,15 55 26,83 16 NL 1,18 99 38,98 225 88,58 33 12,99 174 68,5 230 90,55 PL 963 21 1804 39,34 135 2,94 660 14,39 2919 63,65 57 1,24 RO 3262 SE 0,02 199 1,28 15560 99,98 73 0,47 4561 29,31 4120 26,47 SK 1760 UK 1755 19,33 4076 44,89 6184 68,11 1307 4099 45,14 2680 29,52

4. The contents are relevant but comparability is low Cost of measures Country Measures Article113a Measures Article113b1 Supplementary Measures Total Aggregated Cost reported AT € 400.000.000,00 BE € 681.000.000,00 € 432.000.000,00 BG € 1.336.418.218,00 € 41,00 € 1.202.254.682,00 € 1.141.213.512,00 CY € 340.350.000,00 CZ € 26.575.027,00 DE € 93.870.000.000,00 EE € 1.591.950.000,00 ES € 3.037.555.543,00 € 542.270.962,00 € 3.526.373.531,00 € 25.176.377.469,00 FI € 1.715.045.000,00 FR € 3.738.341.024,00 € 492.388.626,00 € 9.475.269.997,00 € 10.256.270.157,00 HU € 4.110,00 € 1.315,00 € 1.970,00 IE € 1.890.000.000,00 € 100.000.000,00 € 963.000.000,00 € 32.337.678.400,00 IT € 688.030.328,00 € 1.327.138.464,00 € 828.738.887,00 € 1.000.029.996,00 LU € 24.100.000,00 € 31.400.000,00 LV € 1.527.200.000,00 € 1.046.200.000,00 € 31.700.000,00 € 2.168.400.000,00 MT € 12.820.000,00 € 955.000,00 € 8.553.000,00 € 22.300.000,00 NL € 21.600.000.000,00 € 8.912.400.000,00 RO € 19.501.530,00 € 902.000,00 € 588.470,00 SE € 1,00 € 251.188.000,00 € 34.843.000,00 € 286.031.000,00 SK € 4.292.214.000,00 € 298.556.000,00 € - UK € 9.913.500,00 € 374,00 Total € 38.166.184.754,00 € 4.772.000.408,00 € 25.452.212.064,00

3. The contents are relevant but the schemas are too complex POM schema * *

2. The contents are unclear or too complicated

2. The contents are unclear or too complicated Lessons learnt article 8 reporting (monitoring programmes) – WGD meeting September 2009 Too flexible Reporting of the same information in different ways led to double reporting – lack of consistency of the data Different interpretations of what needs to be reported and how Very difficult to interpret

1. The contents are not fit for purpose Inadequate level of aggregation Exceedances of priority substances as groups of substances Hydromorphological pressures and impacts Lack of detail in the reporting of measures Some of the definitions are unclear (e.g. the pressure classes)