Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Figure 1 Weighted social networks for (a) chase behavior and (b) display behavior. Each node represents an individual, and individuals are in the same.

Advertisements

Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.

Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1 Survival plot showing the detection rate of experimental hosts as the proportion butterflies still searching ... Figure 1 Survival plot showing.

Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.

Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram = epg) (A through C) and corresponding infection probabilities estimated by ... Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs.

Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.

Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.

Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.

Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build retreats and 2-dimensional capture webs on (a) trees and (b) fences, 2 very ... Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

AHA: American Heart Association; ALT: ...

Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey; dashed line) and Mimic (predator; solid line) cue values, showing ... Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey;

Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...

Figure 1 Maternal relatedness between calves and non-calf unit members correlates with babysitting rate. Relatedness ... Figure 1 Maternal relatedness.

Figure 2 Boxplots indicating male (top) and female (bottom) mate preferences for native (positive numbers) or foreign ... Figure 2 Boxplots indicating.

Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

RCTs: randomized controlled ...

Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little ... Figure 1 (a) The distribution.

Fig. 1 Graphical representation of improving mortality in stroke patients since the inception of a national stroke ... “Graph courtesy of George Dunn,

Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis of the left acetabulum at baseline (A), 3 months (B), 1 year (C) and 2 years later, ... Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis.

Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated.

Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.

Figure 1. Historical dialectic framework to assess transnational advocacy network influence Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

Take home figure The protective role of CNP/NPR-B/NPRC.

Figure 1 The difference between dominance scores of individual male native Gehyra dubia (n = 10) and introduced male ... Figure 1 The difference between.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Fig. 1 Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematous at the lower limbs

Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses

Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major prey types found in the diet of 9–10-day-old pied flycatcher nestlings in the Drenthe ... Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major.

Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.

Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected isolates (each line represents the average of duplicate studies). AMP, ... Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected.

Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry for human cell differentiation molecules in samples of the right ventricular septum from ... Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry.

Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.

Figure 1. Trunk and leg fat over study period. LS, log transformed.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference in progression to RA in patients with clinically suspect ... Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference.

Figure 1. Oncoprint of selected pathogenic alterations detected in ctDNA. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Fig. 1 A network representation of top 100 co-occurring terms

Figure 1 Changes in average first serve speed (km/h) over age in women (dark gray; online version red) and men (light ... Figure 1 Changes in average first.

Fig. 1 Statistics of the main characters’ dialogues.

Figure 1 Patient selection.

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Figure 1 Pace-of-life should mediate behavior

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Fig. 1 Schematic subcategorization of AAV in three clinically relevant disease categories defined by clinical ... Fig. 1 Schematic subcategorization of.

Fig. 1: World distribution of field sampling locations of Aedes aegypti and Aedes mascarensis screened for Wolbachia ... Fig. 1: World distribution of.

Figure 1 Percentage of male and female helpers in different categories

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves showing crude product limit survival estimates and 95% confidence intervals for time to ... Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves.

Figure 1. Parenting Evaluations by Parenting Style, Education, and Vignette Parent Gender. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

Figure 1. Measuring respondent unhappiness with their child marrying someone from the other party and happiness with ... Figure 1. Measuring respondent.

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.

Figure 1. Evolutionary process of a policy field.

Table 2. Mean noise level results for hand dryers in dBA

Presentation transcript:

Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. Panels a and b: ROMs and (a) chase-based WO (log transformed chases/min) and (b) display-based WO (log transformed displays/min) in dominant males. Panels c and d: ROMs and (c) chase-based WDC (number of individuals chased weighted by distribution of chases) and (d) display-based WDC (number of individuals displayed at weighted by distribution of displays). Trend lines indicate significant (a) or near significant (c) interaction effects. Sample size: blue, n = 13, yellow, n = 23. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 12 January 2019, Pages 490–499, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary189 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3 Dominant males have higher ROMs than subordinates, but there is no difference in TAC. (a) Mean ± SE ROM ... Figure 3 Dominant males have higher ROMs than subordinates, but there is no difference in TAC. (a) Mean ± SE ROM residuals after controlling for restraint time; dominants, n = 42, subordinates, n = 65, (b) mean ± SE TAC measured in Trolox equivalents (TE); dominants, n = 39, subordinates, n = 57. Asterisks indicate significance. *P < 0.05. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 12 January 2019, Pages 490–499, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary189 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2 Neither removal treatments nor individual stability influenced ROMs or TAC. (a) mean ± SE ROM residuals and ... Figure 2 Neither removal treatments nor individual stability influenced ROMs or TAC. (a) mean ± SE ROM residuals and removal treatment, (b) ROM residuals and average individual cosine similarity (a measurement of stability), (c) mean ± SE TAC and removal treatment, and (d) TAC and average individual cosine similarity. Sample size: stable, n = 47, unstable, n = 49. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 12 January 2019, Pages 490–499, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary189 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 1 Weighted social networks for (a) chase behavior and (b) display behavior. Each node represents an individual, ... Figure 1 Weighted social networks for (a) chase behavior and (b) display behavior. Each node represents an individual, and individuals are in the same place in both graphs. Green nodes are dominant males, purple nodes are subordinate males, and tan nodes are females. Edges are weighted based on the number of behaviors (chases or displays) directed at a specific target, nodes are weighted based on the total number of behaviors that node produced. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 12 January 2019, Pages 490–499, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary189 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 5 TAC is related to aggression distribution and display rate in dominant males. Panels a and b: TAC and (a) ... Figure 5 TAC is related to aggression distribution and display rate in dominant males. Panels a and b: TAC and (a) chase-based WO (log transformed chases/min) and (b) display-based WO (log transformed displays/min) in dominant males. Panels c and d: TAC and (c) chase-based WDC (number of individuals chased weighted by distribution of chases) and (d) display-based WDC (number of individuals displayed at weighted by distribution of displays). Trend lines indicate significant correlations. N = 39. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 12 January 2019, Pages 490–499, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary189 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.