Dealing with Slavery in New Territories
Standard: 8.H.2.3: Summarize the role of debate, compromise, and negotiation during significant periods in the history of North Carolina and the United States. 8.H.2.2: Summarize how leadership and citizen actions influenced the outcome of key conflicts in North Carolina and the United States.
Great Slavery Debate The debate over slavery increased with the more land the US acquired The US government came up with multiple compromises to try to maintain the peace between the different regions
Missouri Compromise Balance between free and slave states until Missouri asked for statehood as slave state Compromise made Missouri admitted as a slave state Maine admitted as a free state 36°30 line established − above will be free and below slave Keep peace for the next 30 years
Missouri Compromise
Compromise of 1850 Multiple Parts to help ease tensions between pro and anti-slavery states in US after California wants to be admitted California will be a free state New Mexico and Utah will vote whether to be free or slave state – popular sovereignty Slave Trade in Washington, DC abolished Stricter Fugitive Slave Act laws
Kansas-Nebraska Act Nebraska wanted to enter as a free state Divide Nebraska territory into Nebraska and Kansas According to Missouri Compromise both should be free states – scared this will create a war Allow popular sovereignty in both states (can vote on issue of slavery)
Voting on the issue of slavery in Kansas led to extreme violence Bleeding Kansas Voting on the issue of slavery in Kansas led to extreme violence Both sides insisted they were the real government and winner Both started attacking each side and often ended in death of many people