Figure 1 Study area in Northern Wisconsin, USA, where we simulated the dispersal of 15 translocated American martens ... Figure 1 Study area in Northern.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

J Exp Bot. 2017;68(17): doi: /jxb/erx352

Advertisements

Figure 1. Sgs1 binds to RPA-coated ssDNA

Figure 1. Overview of the workflow of NetworkAnalyst 3.0.

Figure 1 The study area within Vienna Zoo is outlined in red

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc) estimated for each of 23 cohorts by MasterBayes ... Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc)

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

FIGURE 1 Histological diagnoses divided into 8-year time frames (n = 1208). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

FIGURE 1 The effect of daprodustat on hemoglobin (Hgb) levels

Figure 1 The process of bone defect creation, implant insertion and ridge augmentation. (a) Creation of standardized ... Figure 1 The process of bone defect.

FIGURE 2 Responses to the question: regarding vasoactive drugs, does your centre use the following frequently, rarely ... FIGURE 2 Responses to the question:

FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary aldosterone; (B) plasma active renin; (C) urinary AGT concentrations; and (D) plasma AGT ... FIGURE 1 Maternal (A) urinary.

Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected numbers of exon boundaries aligning to boundaries of domain and disorder ... Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA Figure 1. Comparison of weighted.

Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot of cumulative incidence of cancer onset following dermatomyositis diagnosis stratified ... Anti-TIF1-Ab: anti-transcriptional.

Figure 2 Boxplots indicating male (top) and female (bottom) mate preferences for native (positive numbers) or foreign ... Figure 2 Boxplots indicating.

Fig. 1 Mean change from baseline in ANC ± s. e

Point estimates with ... Point estimates with 95% CI. HR: hip replacement; KR: knee replacement. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.

FIGURE 1 Participant flow diagram. Exercise Counseling Clinic (ECC).

Graph 1. The number of homicide cases per year discussing neuro-evidence. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses

Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α protein with Blast-Search and PhyML+SMS ‘One click’ workflow. (A) NGPhylogeny.fr ... Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α.

Figure 2. Natural history of chlamydia transmission, with arrows showing the transitions between health states. Figure 2. Natural history of chlamydia.

Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects

Figure 1. Mean concentration–time profiles of ascending doses of ivermectin in (a) PSAC and (b) SAC. Weight-dependent ... Figure 1. Mean concentration–time.

Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates of the cumulative incidence rates for patients on versus off IST. ON = optic neuritis; ... Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates.

FIGURE 1 Malta: a plate-style food guide

Figure 1. A, Crude incidence rates per 100 person-years of follow-up and 95% confidence intervals for each solid organ ... Figure 1. A, Crude incidence.

FIGURE 1 Study consort diagram

Fig. 2 Case 2. Levels of serum creatinine and anti-GBM antibodies before and during treatment with cyclophosphamide, ... Fig. 2 Case 2. Levels of serum.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.

FIGURE 1 Food groups consumed (mean, g/d) among US infants and young children by age group and tertile of mean ... FIGURE 1 Food groups consumed (mean,

Figure 1. The workflow of Cistrome-GO

Figure 1: Predicted probability of nest presence (0 = no nest and 1 = nest present) in response to canopy cover for ... Figure 1: Predicted probability.

Figure 1. Results of search based on the PRISMA statement.14

Figure 1. Using Voronoi tessellation to define contacts

Figure 4. RLS spectra of (A) TMPipEOPP and (B) OMHEPzEOPP in the presence of different concentrations of KRAS. The RLS ... Figure 4. RLS spectra of (A)

Figure 1. Uncertainty reduction, value creation, and appropriation in two case studies. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1. Trunk and leg fat over study period. LS, log transformed.

Figure 1. The configuration menu allows the user to choose among the main visualization/processing options of the ... Figure 1. The configuration menu.

Figure 1. (A) Architecture of Doc2Hpo. (B) Interactive user interface

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1. MERMAID web server interface (Start page, Parameter page): MERMAID provides two ways to submit a protein ... Figure 1. MERMAID web server interface.

Figure 1. The framework of NetGO with seven steps

Figure 1 Patient disposition

Figure 1. Trial profile. (A) Part A and (B) part B

Figure 4. Healthcare utilization for paediatric diarrhoea by caregivers. Pyramid plot showing the number and ... Figure 4. Healthcare utilization for paediatric.

Figure 1 Distribution of WCD use days in WEARIT-II

Figure 1. SQL schema used by RetroRules

Figure 1 Correlation between en face Oil-Red O staining and aortic root lesion size vs. plasma cholesterol and ... Figure 1 Correlation between en face.

Figure 1. Excess cost of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with methicillin-susceptible S. ... Figure 1. Excess cost of methicillin-resistant.

Figure 1. The proportion of CSBM responders over the 2-week treatment period (A), the proportion of SBM responders by ... Figure 1. The proportion of CSBM.

Figure 1 Genetic results. No case had more than one diagnostic result

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Figure 1. (A) Baseline contrast-enhanced CT scan of melanoma patient presenting with metastases in the liver and lymph ... Figure 1. (A) Baseline contrast-enhanced.

Figure 1. Prevalence of parasitic infection and anemia among the children. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Figure 1 Percentage of male and female helpers in different categories

Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations for coronary artery disease plotted across all chromosomes. Associations added ... Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations.

Source:Zimnisky (2014). Source:Zimnisky (2014).

Figure 1 Mechanisms of mitral regurgitation.

Figure 1. Removal of the 2B subdomain activates Rep monomer unwinding

Figure 2. Model adequacy results for the two empirical data sets, West African Ebola, and 2009 H1N1 influenza. The ... Figure 2. Model adequacy results.

Fig. 1. Examples of plots of NanoPlot and NanoComp

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Figure 1. Hepatitis C screening and diagnostic algorithm at the MSF clinic, Karachi, Pakistan, March 2016–September ... Figure 1. Hepatitis C screening.

Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.

Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 Study area in Northern Wisconsin, USA, where we simulated the dispersal of 15 translocated American martens ... Figure 1 Study area in Northern Wisconsin, USA, where we simulated the dispersal of 15 translocated American martens in 2010. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 12 January 2019, Pages 528–540, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary193 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2 Examples of alternative rules used for habitat suitability in SEARCH modeling of American marten dispersal in ... Figure 2 Examples of alternative rules used for habitat suitability in SEARCH modeling of American marten dispersal in Northern Wisconsin. Panels illustrate the dynamic progression of habitat selectivity over time from the 70% (a), to the 60% (b), and to the 50% (c) threshold rules. Percentages represent the proportion of an area around a pixel in the cover type data that must be represented by nonavoided cover types to be classified as suitable. Therefore, as the percentage decreases over time, martens perceive an increasing proportion of the landscape as suitable and habitat selectivity declines. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 12 January 2019, Pages 528–540, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary193 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3 Performance of the best-performing model scenario from each presented configuration based on the ability to ... Figure 3 Performance of the best-performing model scenario from each presented configuration based on the ability to match empirical patterns of dispersal by 15 martens translocated to Northern Wisconsin in 2010. Asterisks denote the top performing model overall. Patterns matched that are displayed here include (a) dispersal distance mean and SD, (b) time to home range establishment mean and SD, (c) mean average neighbor distance, and (d) mean nearest neighbor distance. Dashed lines represent empirical means, whereas dashed–dotted lines represent empirical means with one outlier removed (time to home range establishment had no outlier). Means and standard deviations from actual martens with and without a single outlier included are represented by hollow bars. For model simulations, the mean of means and mean standard deviations across 5 replicates are presented. Static and Delay scenarios incorporated a single habitat suitability map with the 50%, 60%, or 70% habitat suitability rule. Delay represents an imposed 2-week exploratory phase prior to settlement. Dynamic scenarios incorporated the 2-week delay as well as a progression of habitat suitability maps over time ([70%, 60%, 50% rules] or [80%, 70%, 60% rules]) to represent a decline in habitat selectivity by the disperser. Bound rates are not displayed here because only the overall best performing bound rate for each scenario is presented. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 12 January 2019, Pages 528–540, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary193 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 4 A histogram of dispersal distances across 5 replicates of our top-performing model of American marten ... Figure 4 A histogram of dispersal distances across 5 replicates of our top-performing model of American marten dispersal. These data are fitted to a Weibull dispersal distance kernel plotted as the probability density function of the distribution of distances traveled by dispersing martens away from their release location. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 12 January 2019, Pages 528–540, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary193 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 5 Number of times each of the 3 values tested for number of bounds per minute (i.e., mean step length) was ... Figure 5 Number of times each of the 3 values tested for number of bounds per minute (i.e., mean step length) was selected as the best performing model by each method used to evaluate pattern-matching. Models simulated American marten dispersal of translocated individuals released in Northern Wisconsin in 2010. PF = Pass/Fail; WPF = Weighted pass/fail; RS = Rank-sum; WRS = Weighted rank-sum; D<sup>2</sup> = Mahalanobis distance; TI = Total Indicator. Several instances occurred in which multiple bound rates received the same ranking from the PF and WPF methods. Two ties occurred between 20 and 30 bounds, 2 ties occurred among all 3 bound rates, and 1 tie occurred between 10 and 30 bounds. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 12 January 2019, Pages 528–540, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary193 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.