Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
by Jad I. Belle, David Langlais, Jessica C
Advertisements

Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Single Targeted Exon Mutation Creates a True Congenic Mouse for Competitive Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The C57BL/6-CD45.1STEM Mouse  Francois.
Yumi Matsuzaki, Kentaro Kinjo, Richard C Mulligan, Hideyuki Okano 
Graft-versus-Host Disease Causes Broad Suppression of Hematopoietic Primitive Cells and Blocks Megakaryocyte Differentiation in a Murine Model  Yan Lin,
Francesca Ficara, Mark J. Murphy, Min Lin, Michael L. Cleary 
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
Clonal analysis of thymus-repopulating cells presents direct evidence for self-renewal division of human hematopoietic stem cells by Takashi Yahata, Shizu.
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Cited2 Is an Essential Regulator of Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Long-Term Engraftment of Primary Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Repairs Niche Damage and Improves Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation  Jean-Paul Abbuehl,
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 126, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
The Placenta Is a Niche for Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cells Stimulate Hematopoietic Progenitors by Promoting Cytokine Release from Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells  Christian M. Schürch,
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Mark J. Kiel, Melih Acar, Glenn L. Radice, Sean J. Morrison 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 121, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Hematopoiesis: A Human Perspective
Volume 154, Issue 5, Pages (August 2013)
Kenichi Miharada, Valgardur Sigurdsson, Stefan Karlsson  Cell Reports 
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Emmanuelle Passegué, Erwin F. Wagner, Irving L. Weissman  Cell 
Ravindra Majeti, Christopher Y. Park, Irving L. Weissman 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Masayuki Yamashita, Eriko Nitta, Toshio Suda  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Thymus Exclusivity: All the Right Conditions for T Cells
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Monica L. Guzman, Craig T. Jordan  Cancer Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
SLAM Family Markers Resolve Functionally Distinct Subpopulations of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Multipotent Progenitors  Hideyuki Oguro, Lei Ding, Sean J.
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 600-607.e4 (April 2018) Large-Scale Clonal Analysis Resolves Aging of the Mouse Hematopoietic Stem Cell Compartment  Ryo Yamamoto, Adam C. Wilkinson, Jun Ooehara, Xun Lan, Chen-Yi Lai, Yusuke Nakauchi, Jonathan K. Pritchard, Hiromitsu Nakauchi  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 600-607.e4 (April 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.03.013 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Stem Cell 2018 22, 600-607.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2018.03.013) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Phenotypic HSC Compartment Changes with Age (A) Representative flow cytometric data of young and aged bone marrow (BM): MPP, multipotent progenitor; LMPP, lymphoid-primed multipotent progenitor; Fr 1, fraction 1; Fr 2, fraction 2; Fr 3, fraction 3. (B) Frequency of the HSC/MPP population (left) and HSC subpopulations (right) in young and aged BM (as detailed in A). Dots represent individual mice, and horizontal lines indicate median ± SD. (C) Summary of primary and secondary transplantation experiments to test potential of young and aged single phenotypic HSCs. Single CD34−KSL, fraction 1, fraction 2, or fraction 3 cells were sorted from BM cells of Kusabira Orange (KuO) mice and were individually transplanted with 2 × 105 BM competitor cells from Ly5.1/Ly5.2-F1 mice into lethally irradiated Ly5.2 mice. Chimerism of KuO+ neutrophils/monocytes, erythrocytes, platelets, B cells, and T cells in peripheral blood (PB) was analyzed at 2, 3, 4, 8, (12), 16, (20), and 24 weeks after primary transplantation. Secondary transplantation assays were performed by transferring 1 × 107 whole BM cells from primary recipient mice. PB chimerism was analyzed 4, 12, 16, 20, (and 21–22) weeks in secondary recipients. (D) PB chimerism of individual single young and aged HSCs in a total of 421 primary recipients (as described in C), separated based on lineage output. (E) Estimated frequency of functional HSCs, CMRPs, MERPs, MkRPs, and “other” within the young and aged pHSC compartment, derived from single-cell transplantation assays (Table 1). CMRPs, MERPs, and MkRPs are subsets of MyRPs. “Non-reconstituting” denotes no PB reconstitution of KuO+ cells in primary recipients. Cell Stem Cell 2018 22, 600-607.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2018.03.013) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Functional Comparison of Young and Aged HSCs by Single-Cell Transplantation (A) Average chimerism of young and aged HSCs and MyRP/MySC subsets within primary recipients over 24 weeks. Functional cell types subdivided based on reconstitution duration into long-term (LT) or intermediate-term (IT) and short-term (ST) RCs. Data points indicate mean ± SD. (B) Estimated frequency of each functional cell type (HSCs, CMRPs/CMSCs, MERPs/MESCs, MkRPs/MkSCs, and “other”) divided into LT/IT- and ST-repopulating subsets within the young and aged pHSC compartment, derived from single-cell transplantation assays (Table 1). (C) PB chimerism of individual single young and aged LT- and IT-HSCs in primary and secondary recipients. Blood lineage chimerism in primary recipients at 24 weeks was compared using an unpaired t test (∗p < 0.05). Cell Stem Cell 2018 22, 600-607.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2018.03.013) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A Subset of Aged MyRPs Display a Latent-HSC Phenotype (A) Average chimerism kinetics of young and aged LT-HSCs (n = 24 and 6, respectively), IT-HSCs (n = 24 and 10, respectively), LT-CMSCs (n = 1 and 0, respectively), IT-CMSCs (n = 7 and 3, respectively), and latent-HSCs (n = 0 and 7, respectively) using all single-cell transplantation datasets (including our data published in Yamamoto et al., 2013). Each line represents the frequency of donor-derived cells in the blood of a single recipient after primary transplantation and secondary transplantation. (B) Representative PB and BM chimerism in primary and secondary recipients for latent-HSCs (1–3), young LT-HSCs (4), and aged LT-HSCs (5). The frequency of KuO+ phenotypic stem and progenitor cells within the BM was determined at 24 weeks after primary transplantation and 20 weeks after secondary transplantation. Chimerism of KuO+ phenotypic HSCs, fraction 1, fraction 2, fraction 3 (highlighted in purple), MPPs, LMPPs (highlighted in blue), CMPs, GMPs, MEPs, MkPs (highlighted in gray), or CLPs (highlighted in green) is show in the bar graph. n.d. denotes no data. BM cells from mouse 1-1 and 1-2 and mouse 5-1 and 5-2 were pooled and analyzed. (C) Schematic of age-related changes to the mouse HSC compartment. Circle size/number represents the frequency of each cell type per 106 BM cells. With age, the pHSC compartment expands ∼10-fold, largely due to a large increase in MyRPs/MySCs and non-reconstituting cells. Absolute numbers of functional HSCs (fHSCs) only increases modestly and therefore become less frequent within the pHSC compartment. Cumulatively, this leads to the reduced function of the HSC compartment including loss of lymphoid (B and T cell) lineage output. However, the aged pHSC compartment also contains latent HSCs, which display myeloid-restricted output in primary recipients but multipotent (five blood-lineage) output in secondary recipients. We have not detected latent-HSCs in the young pHSC compartment. Cell Stem Cell 2018 22, 600-607.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2018.03.013) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions