Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Maryam Sayadi, Seiichiro Tanizaki, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 8, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
(Un)Folding Mechanisms of the FBP28 WW Domain in Explicit Solvent Revealed by Multiple Rare Event Simulation Methods  Jarek Juraszek, Peter G. Bolhuis 
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages (June 2012)
Folding Pathways of Prion and Doppel
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Steered Molecular Dynamics Studies of Titin I1 Domain Unfolding
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Mechanical Anisotropy of Ankyrin Repeats
F. Benedetti, C. Micheletti, G. Bussi, S.K. Sekatskii, G. Dietler 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanically Probing the Folding Pathway of Single RNA Molecules
Self-Organization of Myosin II in Reconstituted Actomyosin Bundles
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Meng Qin, Jian Zhang, Wei Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Geometric Asymmetry Induces Upper Limit of Mitotic Spindle Size
Taeyoon Kim, Margaret L. Gardel, Ed Munro  Biophysical Journal 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 103, Issue 9, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
V.M. Burlakov, R. Taylor, J. Koerner, N. Emptage  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Li Sun, Jeffrey K. Noel, Herbert Levine, José N. Onuchic 
Volume 90, Issue 8, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
Probing the Energy Landscape of the Membrane Protein Bacteriorhodopsin
Michael Schlierf, Zu Thur Yew, Matthias Rief, Emanuele Paci 
Irina V. Dobrovolskaia, Gaurav Arya  Biophysical Journal 
Yuliang Zhang, Yuri L. Lyubchenko  Biophysical Journal 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Michael Schlierf, Felix Berkemeier, Matthias Rief  Biophysical Journal 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Multiple Folding Pathways of the SH3 Domain
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Phosphatase Specificity and Pathway Insulation in Signaling Networks
Volume 104, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Flow-Induced β-Hairpin Folding of the Glycoprotein Ibα β-Switch
Dynamics of Myosin-V Processivity
Volume 102, Issue 8, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
J.P. Junker, K. Hell, M. Schlierf, W. Neupert, M. Rief 
In Search of the Hair-Cell Gating Spring
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Enrique M. De La Cruz, Jean-Louis Martiel, Laurent Blanchoin 
Subpiconewton Dynamic Force Spectroscopy Using Magnetic Tweezers
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Volume 93, Issue 8, Pages (October 2007)
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Presentation transcript:

Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 429-441 (January 2009) Changing the Mechanical Unfolding Pathway of FnIII10 by Tuning the Pulling Strength  Simon Mitternacht, Stefano Luccioli, Alessandro Torcini, Alberto Imparato, Anders Irbäck  Biophysical Journal  Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 429-441 (January 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.043 Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic illustration of the NMR-derived (53) native structure of FnIII10 (Protein Data Bank ID 1ttf). Its seven β-strands are labeled A–G in sequence order. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 429-441DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MC time evolution of the end-to-end distance in 42 independent simulations with a constant pulling force of 100 pN. The three most frequent intermediates lack different pairs of native β-strands AG, FG, or AB. Trajectories in which these states occur are labeled green, blue and red, respectively. Apparent two-state events are colored black. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 429-441DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Force versus end-to-end distance in 55 independent simulations with a constant pulling velocity of 0.05 fm/MC step. Noise has been filtered out using a sliding time window of 6 × 106 MC steps. The color coding is the same as in Fig. 2, with the addition of a new category for a few trajectories not belonging to any of the four categories in that figure. These trajectories are colored gray. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 429-441DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Illustration of the diversity of unfolding pathways in the 100 constant-velocity unfolding simulations at v = 0.03 fm/MC step. The numbers indicate how many of the trajectories follow a certain path. The boxes illustrate important structures along the pathways and boxes with dark rims correspond to the most long-lived states. Dark circles mark branch points. Most trajectories pass through G or A, but only a fraction spend a significant amount of time there (see Table 4). The line directly from G to U corresponds to events that either have no intermediate at all or only have intermediates other than the main three. The direct lines N → AB and N → AG describe events that do not clearly pass through A or G, and examples of structures seen in those events are illustrated by the unboxed cartoons next to the lines. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 429-441DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 WLC fits (Eq. 7) to a typical force-extension curve at v = 0.03 fm/MC step. The arrows indicate contour-length differences extracted from the fits: ΔLc(N → I), ΔLc(I → U), and ΔLc(N → U). Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 429-441DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Histogram of the contour-length difference, ΔLc(N → I), obtained by WLC fits (Eq. 7) to our data for v = 0.03 fm/MC step. A total of 121 force peaks corresponding to intermediate states are analyzed. The intermediates are divided into five groups: AB, AG, FG, G, and “other”. The experimental ΔLc(N → I) distribution, from Li et al. (12), is also indicated. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 429-441DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Free-energy landscape G0(L) calculated as a function of the end-to-end distance, L, using data at different pulling velocities, v (given in fm/MC step). In the calculations, L is discretized with a bin size of ΔL = 0.4 nm for v = 1.0 fm/MC step and ΔL = 0.2 nm for all other velocities (see Model and Methods). Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 429-441DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Tilted free-energy landscape G(L) =G0(L) −F ×L for four different forces, F. The unperturbed landscape, G0(L), corresponds to the curve shown in Fig. 7 for v = 0.03 fm/MC step. The minima of G(L) are discussed in the text. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 429-441DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Free-energy barrier, ΔG, separating the native state from extended conformations, as a function of the pulling force, F. The solid line is a linear fit to the data for F > 25 pN, whereas the dashed line refers to a linear fit to the data in the interval 15 pN ≤F ≤ 30 pN. The inset shows the free energy G(L) in the vicinity of the native state for three values of the force. The vertical dashed line indicates the position of the barrier. Biophysical Journal 2009 96, 429-441DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions