Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist South Region Chris LeMieux

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
PBM The Staging Process. Check the dates August In late August, districts receive their PBMAS summary report.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
…what Georgia schools should know, do, and understand.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Support School-wide Evaluation Tool January 2007.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Comprehensive Walk Through Protocol The Comprehensive Walkthrough Protocol.
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Timberlane Regional School District
Instructional Coaching Columbia High School February 17, 2011 JoAnn Moore, Facilitator 10 minutes.
What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
AdvancED Accreditation
SQR Principal Orientation
Overview of MAAP Accreditation
Huntsville City Schools
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
District Accreditation
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Best Practices for Inclusive Education BPIE Information & Support
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
District and School Planning
An Overview of the Minnesota Afterschool Accreditation Program (MAAP)
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Quality Comprehensive Improvement System
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Leadership for Standards-Based Education
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Planning for Continuous Improvement: The importance of goal setting
District and School Planning
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores!
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Overview of Georgia District Review Protocol (GDRP) and Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS) Chris LeMieux Program Assessment.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Georgia’s Systems of Continuous Improvement Georgia School Assessment of Performance on Systems (GSAPS) Orientation Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist.
Unfilled Positions FWEA Meeting March 18, 2019.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Georgia’s Systems of Continuous Improvement Instructional Awareness Walk (IAW) Orientation Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist South Region ansmith@doe.k12.ga.us Chris LeMieux Program Assessment Specialist Metro Region clemieux@doe.k12.ga.us 770-827-6039 Shawn Keim Program Assessment Specialist North Region skeim@doe.k12.ga.us 704-560-0998

Purpose of IAW The Goal of IAW To support a school in the process of establishing and sustaining effective Coherent Instruction and Supportive Learning Environment Systems The Goal of IAW Impact student learning by collaborating with a school to improve instruction

IAW Overview The IAW review process provides detailed information for a school on its progress toward full implementation of Georgia’s Systems of Continuous Improvement (GSCI), especially in the systems of Coherent Instruction and Supportive Learning Environment. An IAW is a review that a school or district can choose to implement to help with its improvement efforts. Any Georgia school can request an IAW review from GaDOE or RESA, or use the review tool to self-assess progress on GSCI.

The Five GSCI Systems Coherent Instruction Effective Leadership Professional Capacity Family and Community Engagement Supportive Learning Environment (Note: The five systems of Georgia’s Systems of Continuous Improvement (GSCI) contain a total of 22 structures.)

Coherent Instruction System Planning for Quality Instruction (CI-1) Delivering Quality Instruction (CI-2) Monitoring Student Progress (CI-3) Refining the Instructional System (CI-4) (Note: The IAW focuses on CI-1, CI-2, and CI-3.)

Supportive Learning Environment System Maintaining Order and Safety (SLE-1) Developing and Monitoring a Tiered System of Supports (SLE-2) Ensuring a Student Learning Community (SLE-3) (Note: The IAW focuses on SLE-1 and SLE-3.)

IAW Stages Part I - Determining Current Level of Instructional Practice Led by School and District Effectiveness (SDE) Team or Trained Staff Part II- Building Effective Instructional Practice Led by school administrative team

Part I - Determining Current Level of Instructional Practice Led by School and District Effectiveness (SDE) Team or trained staff Process Observation Protocol Support to School from Protocol

Items needed for an IAW Review Copies of the teacher roster, master schedule, school map, and bell schedule to the APAS at least two weeks prior to the review. Reserved room at the school for the day to conduct an orientation, a debriefing, and the development of the IAW summary report.

GSCI IAW Tools GSCI Classroom Observation Form GSCI IAW Calculated Tally Report GSCI IAW Protocol Summary GSCI Observation Individual Tally Form Instructional Awareness Walk Team Agenda Instructional Awareness Walk Request Form

Process Conduct classroom observations. Summarize the data and establish next steps. Present data and next steps to principal. Schedule date for follow-up with another protocol implementation visit.

Observation Protocol Observations focus on the GSCI Coherent Instruction and Supportive Learning Environment systems. SDE team or trained staff observes multiple classrooms. Observations are 10 - 15 minutes in length. Observations are confidential and results are not to be shared with individual teachers. SDE team or trained staff collates the data and develops target areas.

Comments and Target Actions Comments (including commendations) are written collaboratively for Coherent Instruction and Supportive Learning Environment Systems/Structures as applicable. Target actions are written collaboratively for Systems/Structures as applicable.

Part II - Building Effective Instructional Practice Led by school administrative team Review all data from the IAW Focus on student learning Align to the district Define Coherent Instructional System Monitoring Reflection

Summary of IAW Protocol An IAW team will conduct classroom observations using a tool focused on the Coherent Instruction and Supportive Learning Environment structures. After reviewing all the IAW observation data, the IAW team will score three structures in Coherent Instruction (CI-1, CI-2, & CI-3) and two structures in Supportive Learning Environment (SLE-1 & SLE-3) and rate the school’s progress on each as either Exemplary, Operational, Emerging, or Not Evident. IAW team writes comments and target actions for the school.

Instructional Awareness Walk Review of Key Points Instructional Awareness Walk Purpose: To provide an objective, baseline assessment of school program’s current effectiveness in implementing the Coherent Instruction (CI-1, CI-2, & CI-3) and Supportive Learning Environment (SLE-1 & SLE-3) structures of the Georgia Systems of Continuous Improvement. Data Sources: classroom observations and available school data Led by: Area Program Assessment Specialists or trained personnel Frequency: On request from all schools as staff capacity allows Collaboration: APAS will provide PL for any organization wanting to use IAW tool in order to build capacity for organizations to self-monitor and to reduce variability of implementation.

Georgia’s Systems of Continuous Improvement Instructional Awareness Walk (IAW) Orientation Anita Smith Program Assessment Specialist South Region anlemieux@doe.k12.ga.us Chris LeMieux Program Assessment Specialist Metro Region clemieux@doe.k12.ga.us 770-827-6039 Shawn Keim Program Assessment Specialist North Region skeim@doe.k12.ga.us 704-560-0998