SAFRAN Workshop on the Application of the IAEA Methodology and Safety Assessment Framework (SAFRAN) Tool for the Safety Case (SC) and Safety Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exemption, Clearance, Discharges
Advertisements

Generic Operational Safety Assessment (GOSA) Workshop on the Application of the IAEA Methodology and Safety Assessment Framework (SAFRAN) Tool for the.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Lecture 10 Comparison and Evaluation of Alternative System Designs.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Regulations Part II: Basic Concepts and Definitions Day 8 – Lecture 5(2)
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
Environmental Protection Waste Safety Section, Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
Challenges in developing a Safety Case WG5. How to Develop a Safety Case SC can be a tool for providing information to stakeholders other than regulators.
Definition, Role and Documentation of the Safety Case: Quick Review
Safety Assessment Methodologies and Implementation of Monitoring and Control Programmes Dr. Japie van Blerk AquiSim Consulting (Pty) Ltd Wednesday, 24.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
The SAFRAN tool Safety Assessment in Predisposal Waste Management IAEA March 2011.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.4. Pre-disposal waste management Safety Standards.
Overview of the SADRMWS safety assessment methodology Workshop on the Application of the IAEA Methodology and Safety Assessment Framework (SAFRAN) Tool.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Nicolas Solente Workshop on Regulatory Requirements to Ensure Safe Disposal of Disused Sealed Sources for Operators and Regulators Amman, JORDAN 7-11 April.
IAEA ANSN RWMTG National Workshop: Application of IAEA Methodology and Tools for the Safety Case and Safety Assessment for Predisposal Management of Radioactive.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
David G Bennett December 2014
1 A Consultancy on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation ~ Experience on aftermath of Fukushima Daiichi NPS accident.
SAFRAN Upgraded to support the implementation of the Borehole Disposal Concept Rodolfo Avila, Facilia AB.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part VI Planned Exposure Situations - Generic Requirements Module VI.3 Requirements for public exposure in.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part III.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on the Demonstration of Operational and Long Term Safety of Predisposal Management Facilities.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on the Demonstration of Operational and Long Term Safety of Predisposal Management Facilities.
 B&H authorities, in 1998, established Radioactive Waste Storage Facility in order to accommodate for a relatively long term period the disused sealed.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Technical Services.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Monika Kinker Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management Unit Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM Technical Meeting to Discuss Human Intrusion and Future Human Actions in relation to Disposal of Radioactive.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on the Demonstration of Operational and Long Term Safety of Predisposal Management Facilities.
International Atomic Energy Agency V. Nys Definition and practical application of demonstration of operational and long-term safety for predisposal RWM.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
1.9. Safety assessment “School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety, IAEA - Module 1 Regulatory framework for safety, authorization and inspection.
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting Practical Application of Safety Assessment Methodologies (CRAFT Project) IAEA Headquarters,
The Safety Case Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management Unit
EPRI Comments Re: NRC “Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal”
Sustaining Cradle-to-Grave Control of Radioactive Sources (INT-9182) Meeting on the development, revision and implementation of the safety case and safety.
Module Planned exposure situations Public exposure (GSR Part 3)
Regulations Part II: Basic Concepts and Definitions
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module V Safety classification of structures, systems and components Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015.
-EL ABBARI Younes, FADIL Najib (CNESTEN) -SADIQ Younes (AMSSNuR)
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1136 on CSM Design Targets (CSM-DT)
Categorization of Radioactive Sources
Engineering Processes
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Joint WG on Guidance for an Integrated Transport and Storage Safety Case for Dual Purpose Casks TM TM to Produce Consolidated Drafts of the IAEA’s.
Revisions to the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery,
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Overview of the SADRMWS safety assessment methodology
Plenary Meeting of the Network on  Environmental 
Introduction: IAEA activities / Documents on human intrusion
Status of the IAEA safety standards and Relation to the CRAFT project
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
SAFRAN Upgraded to support the implementation of the Borehole Disposal Concept Rodolfo Avila, Facilia AB.
Preliminary Hazard Analysis of Bunker
Presentation for TRANSSC 20 meeting – June 2010
Presentation transcript:

SAFRAN Workshop on the Application of the IAEA Methodology and Safety Assessment Framework (SAFRAN) Tool for the Safety Case (SC) and Safety Assessment (SA) for Predisposal Management of Disused Sealed Radioactive Sources (DSRS) Athens, GREECE 23-27 June 2014

SAFRAN A software package for assessing radiological safety of pre-disposal waste management activities

Purpose of SAFRAN Implements methodologies developed within the SADRWMS project. It provides aid in: Describing predisposal radioactive waste management activities in a systematic way, Conducting the safety assessment with clear documentation of the methodology, assumptions, input data and models, Establishing a traceable and transparent record of the safety basis for decisions on proposed waste management solutions, Demonstrating clear consideration of and compliance with national and international safety standards and recommendations.

Benefits of SAFRAN Implements methodologies that have been conciliated at international level – IAEA standards. Facilitates performing iterations of the Safety Asessment, for example in case of upgrades of facilities, if new waste streams appear, etc. Several experts can work more effectively in the same safety assessment. SAFRAN facilitates exchange of experience through sharing projects and databases. Facilitates regulatory review by providing a transparent representation of all SA components. The regulator can use the SAFRAN projects in independent safety assessments. SAFRAN can be used for creating generic safety assessments. Overview of SAFRAN Tool 4

History of the development (1) The tool development started in April 2005 In the frame of the IAEA project: SADRWMS – Safety Assessment Driving Radioactive Management Solutions From April 2007 it was introduced in another IAEA project: DeSa – Safety Assessment in Decommissioning From 2008 – Sponsoring from SSM (Sweden), NDA (UK) and IRSN (France)

History of the development (2) From April 2008 - development of a new User Interface and new Calculation Tool based on Ecolego. Development of website for downloading the tool. Development of first version of User Guide in Wiki language. AUGUST 2010 – RELEASE OF VERSION 1.0 Testing by Studsvik AB Preparation of User Guide and Tutorials Some improvements in the Safety Assessment Module

Test Cases Development of specifications: Treatment plant in Vinca, IAEA training courses: Slovenia, Croatia, Moscow, Belarus, Chile and Cuba, Development of specifications for decommissioning: Decommissioning of a nuclear laboratory in the US. Waste Treatment Plant and Storage facility of the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant, Treatment Plant in Studsvik – 2 iterations (Sweden), National waste treatment and storage facility in Thailand.

SAFRAN components SAFREQ Report System description Safety Assessment Site features, waste producers, waste streams Safety Assessment Normal Operation, Accidents Report Regulatory Framework SAFCALC DATABASE

System Description For each configuration Site Facilities Rooms Areas (Storage or Processing) Physical elements Safety elements Waste Management Activities Processes Check for clearance Waste Producers Primary Waste Components Waste Streams

Types of safety elements Site selection Safety functions Limits and conditions Mantainance requirements Operational procedures Emergency procedures Management systems Can be linked to physical elements and assessments

Waste management activities Description Output(s) from activities Reduction factors One and only one WMA can be assigned to an area

Reduction factors Define how the activity changes the waste properties: Volume, mass and activity Sorting of waste Output Volume Massa Activity Combustible 5 % Non combustible 95 %

Check for clearance Possible to make comparisons of activity concentrations in the waste components against IAEA´s and user defined clearance criteria Clearance criteria are defined for unconditional clearance of solid materials and expressed in Bq/g

Processes A process is a sequence of WMAs which can be used in defition of Waste Streams (WS)

Waste Streams Waste streams represent the fate of waste components through different steps of processing, storing and clearing of wastes Consider changes of waste properties in these steps.

SAFRAN components SAFREQ Report System description Safety Assessment Site features, waste producers, waste streams Safety Assessment Normal operation, accidents Report Regulatory Framework SAFCALC DATABASE

Regulatory Framework Regulatory requirements Criteria Doses in during normal operation (Sv/y) and accidents (Sv). Workers and members of the public Several regulatory frameworks can be added to a project, for example IAEA and national, and all can be used in the SA

SAFRAN components SAFREQ Report System description Safety Assessment Site features, waste producers, waste streams Safety Assessment Normal operation, accidents Report Regulatory Framework SAFCALC DATABASE

Assessment types For normal operation and accidents. Doses to workers and members of the public. Radiological impacts indoors and outdoors.

Assessment context Link to one or more Regulatory Frameworks Purpose – select from a list or add own Scope – Define which facilites, rooms and areas will be included in the SA and at what level the assessment is carried out Approach PIEs will be defined or only PIE types will be used. Include or not a step for Screening of Hazards. Compliance with Safety Requirements will be assessed or not?

Graded approach to the assessments Impacts Optional step calculations for standardized conservative exposure situations Screening or Hazards calculations for specified endpoints and expecific exposure conditions Dose Assessment

Safety Assessment for Normal Operation Endpoints definition – several endpoints that can be optionally linked to one or more regulatory criteria Indoors and Outdoors Dose (Sv/y) or Other Scenarios Relevant or not relevant Bounded or not (if bounding scenarios are defined) Quantitative or qualitative Indoors or outdoors Radiological consequences Indoors: Direct external exposure and exposure by inhalation or Other Outdoors: Releases to air, liquid discharges or Other

Normal operation scenarios Impacts are classified by their location and type: Inside the facility (workers exposure) Direct external exposure and exposure via inhalation, Other; Outside the facility (public exposure): Releases to air, Liquid discharges, Other. In case of assessment of scenarios for normal operation conditions, the SAFRAN classifies arising impacts by their location and radiological impact type. Basing on this classification, SAFRAN selects appropriate procedure and model for calculation of impacts.

Screening of hazards and Hazard Quotient Screening of hazards – implementation of the graded approach; For screening of hazards SAFRAN uses the concept of hazard quotient (HQ) The graded approach means that the scope and level of detail of the safety assessment carried out for any particular facility or activity shall be consistent with the magnitude of the possible radiation risks arising from the facility or activity. Therefore the SAFRAN includes procedure for the screening of hazards in order to identify and direct efforts towards all significant and relevant hazards for the facility or activity. Screening out - means that the hazard associated impact is evaluated to be sufficiently low that does not need for any further assessment. Hazard screening allows reducing of number of scenarios to be further assessed. HQ is comparison of particular scenario generated impact against the impact which can be considered as being insignificant and therefore could be screened out from further consideration. The impacts can be assessed qualitatively or quantitatively. Qualitative methods usually are used when the magnitude of the impact is either very high or very low. For situations in between usually there is a need for quantification of the impacts. For example, SAFRAN comes with a default scale of hazards for normal operation scenarios with five categories: Very Low, Low, Medium, High and Very High. The assumed correspondence between these categories and the Hazard Quotients (HQ) are shown in the table.

HQ: External irradiation and inhalation SAFRAN default values: Screening dose to worker is 0.1 mSv/y, Annual worker exposure time is 2000 h/y (i.e. working time is 8 h per day, 5 days per week and 50 weeks per year). User may set its own value for screening dose rate basing on actual conditions to be assessed.

HQ: Releases to atmosphere SAFRAN default values: Screening dose to member of the public is 0.01 mSv/y, Release to dose calculation factors (mSv/Bq) are based on the IAEA Safety Report Series No. 19 defined Generic Environmental Model; User may set its own value for screening release rate basing on actual conditions to be assessed. The Generic Environmental Model for releases into atmosphere are based on assumptions that are expecting being sufficiently conservative for most of usually encountered practices. The similar approach is used for screening of hazards associated with liquid discharges.

Dose assessments If scenario is not screened out basing on HQ dose rate (inside facility) release / discharge (outside facility) then dose calculation is performed; Calculation continues with already identified impacting parameters (dose rate, release / discharge rate).

Dose assessments (cont.) External irradiation and inhalation: User defines actual exposure time: Releases to atmosphere / Liquid discharges SAFRAN includes database of release to dose conversion factors:

Dose assessments (cont.) Releases to atmosphere / Liquid discharges SAFRAN includes database of release to dose conversion factors; SAFRAN includes SAFCALC tool where IAEA Safety Reports Series No. 19 models are implemented and can be used with user defined parameters; User values of DCF.

Safety Assessment for Accidents PIE types External natural External human induced Internal Endpoints definition – several endpoints that can be optionally linked to one or more criteria Indoors and Outdoors Dose (Sv) or Other Scenarios and impacts PIEs Scenarios Impacts

Assessments for accidents PIE Type PIE 1 PIE n Scenario 1 Scenario n Scenario m Impact 1 Impact n Impact m Screening of hazards Endpoint 1 Endpoint n Ass Case 1 Ass Case n

Default scale of probabilities PIE properties Relevant or not Probability (per year or during facility lifetime) Qualitative: Very Low, Low, Medium, High, Very High Quantitative: Probability of occuring at least once Default scale of probabilities Qualitative Category Probability during lifetime Annual probability 1/y Very High > 95 % > 3,0E-02 High 75-95 % 1,4E-02 - 3,0E-02 Medium 5-75 % 5,0E-04 - 1,4E-02 Low 0,1-5 % 1,0E-05 - 5,0E-04 Very Low < 0,1 % < 1,0E-05

Scenario properties Relevant or not The probability may or not be the same as the probability of the linked PIE Several scenarios may be linked to the same PIE, but a scenario can have only one PIE A scenario may have several impacts and several scenarios can be linked with the same impact

Properties of impacts from accidents Relevant or not relevant Bounded or not (currently practically not used) Quantitative or qualitative Indoors or outdoors Radiological consequences Indoors: Releases to air, increased direct external exposure and Other Outdoors: Releases to air, liquid discharges or Other If the same endpoint is assigned to several impacts of the same scenario, then for this endpoint SAFRAN will also calculate the sum of the doses from all impacts.

Potentially Affected Inventory (PAI) Also known as Material At Risk Is the radionuclide inventory or amount, in Bq, that can be affected during an accident. Examples The PAI for an accident consisting of dropping a waste package equals the total activity in the package. The PAI for an accident during a processing activity equals the activity involved in one instance of the activity

Calculation of PAI For Storage Areas the PAI is the total activity present in the Area, i.e. the summa over all stored Waste Components. For Processing Areas the PAI is the Capacity of the Processing Activity (m3) multiplyied by the radionuclide concentration in the waste. For each processing activity SAFRAN calculates two PAI values, using the concentrations in the waste before and after the activity. The user has to choose between these. In the PAI calculation for an Area, all Waste Streams passing through this Area are considered. In the PAI calculation for a Room all areas in this Room are considered. In the PAI calculation for a Facility all Rooms in this Facility are considered.

Release Fractions Release Fraction (RF) is the fraction of the Potential Affected Inventory that is released to air during the accident. The RF depends on the Waste Form, the Radionuclide and the Type of Effect of the accident. Values of RF are given in the SAFRAN Database. It is assumed that RF correspond to respirable fractions.

Analysis of the results Comparison of hazards. Comparison of doses against regulatory criteria – assessment of compliance. Definition of modifications of the facilities, waste management activities, existing and new safety elements.

Example of Probability-Consequence plots HQ/Prob Very Low Low Medium High Very High <0.1 SC3 0.1- 1 SC4 1-10 SC2 10-100 >100 SC1

SAFRAN components SAFREQ Report System description Safety Assessment Site features, waste producers, waste streams Safety Assessment Normal operation, accidents Report Regulatory Framework SAFCALC DATABASE

Models available in SAFCALC IAEA SR-19 models: screening models for routine releases to the atmosphere, lakes, rivers, estuarines and coastal areas. Model for accidental releases to the atmosphere. Model for accidental releases inside a room. Simple dosimetry models: point source, disc, cylinder, cube (with and without shielding)

Uncertainty analysis Probabilistic simulations using Monte Carlo random sampling and Latin Hypercube sampling. Sensititivy analyses using regressions, correlations and variance based methods.

SAFRAN components SAFREQ Report System description Safety Assessment Site features, waste producers, waste streams Safety Assessment Normal operation, accidents Report Regulatory Framework SAFCALC DATABASE

Database Radionuclide half lives. Clearance levels. Gamma constants – dose rates at 1 m from a point source. Screening dose rates for Normal and accidental situations. Screening release rates for Normal operation. Screening releases for accidental situations. Release Fractions. Dispersion factors. Dose Conversion Factors for Normal and accidental situations.

SAFRAN components SAFREQ Report System description Safety Assessment Site features, waste producers, waste streams Safety Assessment Normal operation, accidents Report Regulatory Framework SAFCALC DATABASE

SAFRAN website www.safran.facilia.se Free download of the software and documentation Online User Guide Tutorials SAFRAN projects – TNIT test case GOSA Discussion Forum