Simulation Results for Controlled Contention Mechanism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc: IEEE /705ar0 Submission Javier del Prado et. al November 2002 Slide 1 Mandatory TSPEC Parameters and Reference Design of a Simple Scheduler.
Advertisements

Doc.:IEEE /525Ar0 Submission September 2002 Mathilde Benveniste, Avaya Labs Slide 1 Simplifying Polling Mathilde Benveniste
Doc. :IEEE /314r0 Submission Sai Shankar et al., Philips ResearchSlide 1 May 2002 TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size? Sai Shankar, Javier.
Doc.: IEEE /492r0 Submission Lim Wei Lih, Matsushita Electric Ind. Slide 1 July 2001 Comments on AV transmission Recommended Practice Yasuo HARADA,
Doc.:IEEE /321r0 Submission May 2002 Y. Liu, et al Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation Yonghe Liu, Jin-meng Ho, Matthew B. Shoemake, Jie Liang.
Doc.: IEEE /594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 1 PF Differentiation and EDCF/RR Mathilde Benveniste.
Doc.: IEEE /289r0 Submission Bobby Jose,Slide 1 March 2002 CC/RR Alternatives HCF Adhoc Discussion Work Sheet V00.04 Bobby Jose, et.al
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Doc.: IEEE /605r3 Submission November 2001 S. Kandala, et. al. Slide 1 CFB Ending Rule under HCF Srinivas Kandala, Ken Nakashima, Yashihiro Ohtani.
Doc.: IEEE /1019r1 Submission July 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Supporting Large Number of STAs in ah Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0112r4 Submission Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations September 2012 Slide 1 I2R Date:
A Virtual Collision Mechanism for IEEE DCF
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1512r4 November 2011 Slide 1 MAC considerations for ah (Probe and Pull MAC) Date: Authors: Zhong-Yi Jin, Nokia.
Doc.: IEEE /601r0 Submission Harada Yasuo, Matsushita Electric Ind. Slide 1 November20 01 Delayed Acknowledgement v.s. Normal Acknowledgement.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1512r1 Company Confidential November 2011 Slide 1 MAC considerations for ah (Probe and Pull MAC) Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /30r2 SubmissionMukul Goyal, U Wisconsin MilwaukeeSlide 1 Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE /1280r1 November 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA Date: Slide.
Performance Evaluation of IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /0362r0 March 2015 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) Beacon Transmission Issues Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0843r1 July 2015 Submission(ZTE) UL MU Random Access Analysis Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Yonggang.
Doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: Slide.
Distributed-Queue Access for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Authors: V. Baiamonte, C. Casetti, C.-F. Chiasserini Dipartimento di Elettronica, Politecnico di.
Doc.: IEEE /0370r0 Submission January 2012 Haiguang Wang et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 TIM Compression Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /248r0 Submission Bobby JoseSlide 1 February 2002 Contention Free TXOP Request and Allocation Issues Bobby Jose,
Doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Issues related to OCW management Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Chapter 7 – Aloha-Based Protocol
Delayed Acknowledgement v.s. Normal Acknowledgement
Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations
Non-Automatic Power Saving Delivery
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited
Overheads in Data Stream Over WLAN
Ack Bitmap length for Burst ACK
EDCA and BlockAck Extensions for Reliable Multicast/Broadcast Services
Simulation for EDCF Enhancement Comparison
Remedy to the ‘Missing Ack Problem’
HCF Duration Field Set Rules
Contention Based UL-OFDMA Random Access without back-off
Ack Bitmap length for Burst ACK
Srinivas Kandala Sharp Labs
EDCA Enhancement to Improve Link Reliability for Multicast Streams
Class-based Contention Periods (CCP) for the n MAC
Group Polling for DCF Based Reservation Request
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
Srinivas Kandala Sharp Labs
Delayed Acknowledgement v.s. Normal Acknowledgement
Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance
Acknowledgement for Multicast Streams
Extension Channel CCA Proposed Solutions
Simulations of Probes, Authentication, Association and Keys
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
Delayed Acknowledgement v.s. Normal Acknowledgement
Ack Bitmap length for Burst ACK
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Srinivas Kandala Sharp Labs
MDA Simulation Study: MDAOP Stretching and Other Concerns
Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance
Srinivas Kandala Sharp Labs
Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations
Tge Request to ANA Srinivas Kandala Sharp Labs of America, Inc.
Tge draft ballot information
802.11g Contention Period – Solution for Co-existence with Legacy
Proposed Resolution for Draft 3.0
(Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.)
Srinivas Kandala Sharp Labs
LC MAC submission – follow up
Enhancement for AV Transmission
TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size?
Presentation transcript:

Simulation Results for Controlled Contention Mechanism November 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/XXXr0 November 2001 Simulation Results for Controlled Contention Mechanism Yasuo HARADA, Pek Yew Tan, Wei Lih Lim Matsushita Electric Ind. Presented by: S. Kandala, Sharp Labs Y. Herada et. al. Srinivas Kandala, Sharp Labs

Controlled Contention November 2001 Controlled Contention AP initiate controlled contention by sending out CC frame which indicate the number of RR slots that are being allocated On upon receiving CC frame, station determine a RR slot for transmission Controlled Contention can effectively reduce the number of stations contending for RR slots by specifying criteria. An efficient method for station to indicate TXOP request Y. Herada et. al.

Simulation Aim Scenarios November 2001 Simulation Aim Measure the time duration taken for X number of stations to successfully transmit a frame with MSDU size = 1880 bytes to AP at 36Mbps, where X = 5, 10, 20 & 50 Scenarios Case 1: Using only CSMA/CA Case 2: Controlled Contention (RR slots = No of stations associated with AP) followed by CSMA/CA Case 3: Controlled Contention (RR slots = 2 * No of stations associated with AP) followed by CSMA/CA Y. Herada et. al.

Results Note: Average Duration Time shown is in s November 2001 doc.: IEEE 802.11-01/XXXr0 November 2001 Results Note: Average Duration Time shown is in s Retry Counter for CSMA/CA is set to unlimited CCOP = 440 s (time duration to transmit a frame with size = 1880 bytes at 36Mbps OFDM) Case 2 and Case 3 will produce better result if controlled contention is initiated more than once. Cases that starting with Controlled contention reduce the number of stations contending before normal transmission. Y. Herada et. al. Srinivas Kandala, Sharp Labs