Comparison of the Unstructured Clinician Gestalt, the Wells Score, and the Revised Geneva Score to Estimate Pretest Probability for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Andrea Penaloza, MD, Franck Verschuren, MD, PhD, Guy Meyer, MD, Sybille Quentin-Georget, MD, Caroline Soulie, MD, Frédéric Thys, MD, PhD, Pierre-Marie Roy, MD, PhD Annals of Emergency Medicine Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 117-124.e2 (August 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.002 Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Study population. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2013 62, 117-124.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.002) Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Comparison of the predictive accuracy of the 3 clinical probability assessment methods in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, using clinical probability groups (low, moderate, and high). Annals of Emergency Medicine 2013 62, 117-124.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.002) Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions
Figure E1 ROC curves: Comparison of the predictive accuracy of the 3 clinical probability assessment methods in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, using clinical probability groups (low, moderate, and high). Patients with gestalt assessment alone (n=870). AUC, Area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; CP, clinical probability; RGS, revised Geneva score. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2013 62, 117-124.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.002) Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions
Figure E2 ROC curves: Comparison of the predictive accuracy of the 3 clinical probability assessment methods in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, using clinical probability groups (low, moderate, and high). Patients with a clinical decision rule assessment besides gestalt assessment (n=168). AUC, Area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; CP, clinical probability; RGS, revised Geneva score. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2013 62, 117-124.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.002) Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions