Writing Across the Curriculum

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Tasks for English Language Arts
Advertisements

ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
PORTFOLIO.
Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
Individual Hour Activities Picture Description Oral & Written Presentation Betty Simelmits.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Using the Seven Principles as a Framework for the Evaluation of Student Ratings and Teaching Karl Wirth and Adrienne Christiansen Serie Center for Scholarship.
Student Writing in Geoscience Courses
The Writing Center St. Joseph’s Hall, 3 rd Floor, Room
IDEAL MIDDLE LEVEL DESIGN PROJECT AMLE, NASHVILLE, TN. NOVEMBER 6, 2014 D. MICHELLE WILLIAMS – STEPHEN F. AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY.
Debbie Poslosky Taken from the Common Core Standard Document.
Overview of the Common Core ELA Learning Standards Dennis Atkinson Christine Cutler IES E2BOCES
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Integrating Outcomes Teaching Writing Intensive LSICs.
College Reading and Writing: The Typical and the Exemplary Ann M. Johns, PhD Professor Emerita, Linguistics & Writing Studies San Diego State University.
Patricia Linton, Ph.D. Professor of English Senior Associate Dean for Academics College of Arts and Sciences Retention / Progress toward Tenure.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
Incorporating Writing Into Teaching Nestor Matthews Psychology / Neuroscience Denison University.
An Institutional Writing Assessment Project Dr. Loraine Phillips Texas A&M University Dr. Yan Zhang University of Maryland University College October 2010.
MUS Outcomes Assessment Workshop University-wide Program-level Writing Assessment at The University of Montana Beverly Ann Chin Chair, Writing Committee.
Mary Ann Roe e-Colorado Portal Coordinator Colorado Department of Labor and Employment Jennifer Jirous Computer Information Systems Faculty Pikes Peak.
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Amy Wagaman Amherst College Mathematics and Statistics.
Critical Information Literacy
Learning Assessment Techniques
The Benefits of Using a Rubric
Anthony Williams, Maria Northcote, Jason Morton and John Seddon
ESSAY WRITING SKILLS How to improve them.
UC Prompts Prompt 1: Tell us about a personal quality, talent, accomplishment, contribution or experience that is important to you. What about this quality.
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
AP Language and Composition
The NMSU Writing Center
Newcomers in your school
The NMSU Writing Center
The NMSU Writing Center
Mrs. Jennewine 8th Grade Language Arts.
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Understanding Assignments
Collin County Community College Spring Creek Campus
ENG 101 English/Semester 1 – 3 DE credits
CLUE WRITING CENTER BASICS
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) &
Online Instruction Implementation and pedagogical dimensions of online instruction within the context of purpose William C. Rivenbark Professor and MPA.
Using VALUE Rubrics to Assess Almost Any Program Outcome
Mapping Outcomes it’s not so bad.
JCPS Success Skills Prepared and Resilient Learner
Oral Communication in the Psychology of Music
English Learner Parent Academy
Assignment Design Workshop
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
By Leanna Johnston and Geraldine D. St-Pierre
Jaeliza Morales CUR/516 Dr. Mary Poe
Designing the PACS 2 RESEARCH PAPER Assignment
WRITING TEST 40-minute essay
Providing Effective Feedback to Students
How do current core learning goals integrate into courses?
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Writing about Teaching for Tenure and Promotion
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
Presentation transcript:

Writing Across the Curriculum Enhancing Instruction to Advance Psychology Scholarship and Student Success Brought to you by the American Psychological Association

Presenters Joel M. Williams Quality Enhancement Plan Director / Writing Program Administrator Edward Waters College Nestor Matthews Professor, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience Program Denison University Dennis Millan Director, Center for Academic Enhancement Holy Family University Robin Musselman Professor of Social Science Lehigh Carbon Community College

Peer-to-Peer Writing Workshops Across the Psychology Curriculum

Denison University Context 4-Year Residential Liberal Arts College ~240 Faculty College Wide ~2,200 Students College Wide ~300 Intro Psyc (w/Lab) Students Annually ~60 Psychology Senior Majors Annually ~13 Tenure-Track Faculty ~10 - ~30 Typical Class Size

Motivation For Peer-to-Peer W.W. Increase Student Learning via Increased Engagement “The one who does the work does the learning!” -José Antonio Bowen (CUR - June 2018) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push-up#/media/File:Marines_do_pushups.jpg

Goals For Peer-to-Peer W.W. APA Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major GOAL 4: Communication 4.1 Demonstrate effective writing for different purposes 4.1A Construct arguments clearly and concisely using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories 4.1B Craft clear and concise written communications to address specific audiences (e.g., lay, peer, professional) 4.1C Use grammar appropriate to professional standards and conventions 4.1E Tailor length and development of ideas in formats that fit the purpose 4.1G Seek feedback to improve writing quality resulting in multiple drafts

Goals For Peer-to-Peer W.W. APA Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major GOAL 4: Communication 4.3 Interact effectively with others 4.3A Show capacity for listening and decoding both overt and covert messages 4.3C Interact sensitively with people of diverse abilities, backgrounds, and cultural perspectives

Writing Workshop Ingredients Assignment Prompt 2. Writing Rubric 3. In-Class Procedure Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9y8fr/

In-Class Procedure for W.W. Students submit essay electronically prior night Students bring stapled, anonymized print-copy to class Printed essays are shuffled on front table Students pick-up … An essay that is NOT their own A copy of “Feedback on Writing Style” (FOWS) form A blue pen

In-Class Procedure for W.W. “To Learn, Retrieve” https://makeitstick.net/ Students study the 26 F.O.W.S. items for 3 minutes. Students retrieve items (written recall) for 3 minutes. The goal is to get the F.O.W.S. items eventually into LTM.

In-Class Procedure for W.W. Round 1 - The Blue Round (10 minutes) Students write an ID on the back of the essay Students use the F.O.W.S. form to enumerate edits Students are free to add other comments Round 1 Recap (3 minutes) Students verbally report examples of strong writing Students verbally report ways to improve writing

In-Class Procedure for W.W. Round 2 - The Green Round (10 minutes) Papers are shuffled again on front table Students pick up a new essay, and a green pen Students write an ID on the back of the essay Students use the F.O.W.S. form to enumerate edits Students are free to add other comments Round 2 - Recap (3 minutes) Students verbally report how the Round 1 (Blue) editor did

In-Class Procedure for W.W. Round 3 - The Purple Round (10 minutes) Papers are shuffled again on front table Students pick up a new essay, and a purple pen Students write an ID on the back of the essay Students use the F.O.W. form to enumerate edits Students are free to add other comments Round 3 - Recap (3 minutes) Were some papers stronger than others? Why?

Benefits of Peer-to-Peer W.W. Students are fully engaged the entire period! “The one who does the work does the learning” The Writing Workshop (W.W.) adds variety to in-class activities. 2. Students Learn… How to apply a writing rubric (F.O.W.S.). About the range of writing competency in the room. Civility in providing written / oral feedback. 3. Instructors gain insight into each student’s editing skills. 4. Instructors have a head-start on grading the essays!