Another Modular Focal Plane: Part 2 – FP assembly

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flex Circuit Design for CCD Application ECEN 5004 Jon Mah.
Advertisements

6-7 July 20051B. C. Bigelow - UM Physics Finite element analysis of DECam May 11 C1 corrector lens – gravity and thermal load cases Bruce C. Bigelow, Physics.
A vertical-flexure CCD module Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 10/7/04.
Ceramic Focal Plane Components For SNAP B. C
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Integration Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 27, 2004.
PLATO kick-off meeting 09-Nov-2010 PLATO Payload overall architecture.
Cryostat Structural, Thermal, and Vacuum Systems 14 October 2008 Martin Nordby, Gary Guiffre, John Ku, John Hodgson.
Berkeley workshop summary Redundancy : dual detector Field of view : 3”x6” Spectrograph length goal: < 400 mm Isostatic mount on the base plate with control.
Space Frame Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 11/04/04.
Solar orbiter – EUS instrument mechanical design Tim Froud and Doug Griffin.
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
Design Analysis ‘n Manufacturing By - Yogesh Arora and Sangam Sinha.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Telescope Mechanical Design Albert Lin The Aerospace Corporation Mechanical Engineer (310)
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
W.O. Miller i T i VG 1 Example Barrel Structures- Disk Primary FEA of Disk Frame Supports FEA of Disk Frame Supports –Structure 2m long with two end plates.
Determinate Space Frame Telescope Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 7/28/04.
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
FNAL Meeting, July 2006 Basti, Bedeschi, Raffaelli, INFN-Pisa 1 ILC cryomodule mechanical work at INFN-Pisa  Ongoing work  Near term future  Manpower.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 5.1 Grid Box Design 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Standardized CCD and MCT detector mounting configurations B. C. Bigelow, UM Physics 2/2/05.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
1 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts B. C. Bigelow, UM Physics 3/24/05.
LBNL CCD Packaging “Yale Mount” Mechanical Analysis Dan Cheng LBNL.
VXD Mechanical R&D at the University of Washington H. Lubatti, C. Daly, W. Kuykendall LCRD in conjunction with Fermilab, SLAC.
Grid Thermal Distortion 16 September 2008 Martin Nordby, John Hodgson.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 to 06/07/15 1.
Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring Robert Besuner 12 August 2004.
Opto-Mechanics for SNAP at UM
M-21 Mockup Fold-Flat Mirror Assembly M21-B-2 Robin Lafever LBNL 1 Fabrication and assembly notes.
Improved Annular-Field Three-Mirror Anastigmat? M.Lampton UCB SSL Previous AFTMAs have pri-sec separation 2.4m Can pri-sec separation be reduced? –Support.
An alternative spectrograph mount Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/14/04.
1 About this model This model employs 3 inverted ‘bipods’ for baffle. Bipods in quotes because legs are not pinned at ends, but are fixed-fixed. No skins.
A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Calculate Displacement Due to Random Vibration For A Space Based Focal Plane Anthony J. Davenport Senior Mechanical Engineer.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 1. Introduction Both cavities will be supported by the fundamental power coupler and a number of blade flexures.
Design and Development of the FSM (Fast steering Secondary Mirror)
Lower Baffle Robert Besuner 26 August Background/Purpose This study follows on to 12 August study of the Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring. —In.
Status report AHCAL Mechanics Karsten Gadow CALICE Collaboration Meeting KEK, Studies of AHCAL absorber structure stability.
Jeff Bolognese p1 Super Nova/Acceleration Probe 16 November 2001 Structural Analysis Jeff Bolognese 16 November 2001.
IRMOS Diffraction Grating Integral Tab Design  Performance of an optical system is highly sensitive to the surface distortion of the optics in the system.
Periscope Configuration
Mass Simulator Concepts Robert Besuner 12 October 2005.
1DSM/DAPNIA/SAp – J. MartignacPACS - IHDR - MPE – Nov. 12 – 13, 2003 PACS – IHDR PhFPU Design J. Martignac CEA/DSM/DAPNIA Service d’Astrophysique.
Simbol–X workshopMay 14th, 2007 The Simbol-X Detector Payload P. Laurent CEA/Saclay & APC.
Lightweight mirror technology using a thin facesheet with active rigid support J. H. Burge, J. R. P. Angel, B. Cuerden, H. Martin, S. Miller University.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
Another Modular Focal Plane: Part 1 – Sub-modules Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/17/04.
PLATO Focal Plane Assemblies (FPA) Roser Urquí Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA)
AMS TRD GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM BOX_S Mechanical Structure Corrado Gargiulo* Robert Becker** *INFN Roma1 **MIT CERN, July AMS TRD GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM.
1/31 Correlation and Error Localization Analytical versus Experimental Dynamics of a Large Structural Assembly Thesis presentation, Herman Marquart, 2013.
IPN Lyon ILD Mechanical structure February 2015 Design, Integration & Services J.C Ianigro - IPN Lyon -
Thermal Shield Update Niklas Templeton 15/02/16 (final update of placement  )
HL-LHC-UK Thermal Shield Update Niklas Templeton 07/03/2016.
Lessons from CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and CLIO collaborators GWADW2012 Hawaii 2012/5/16.
Integral Field Spectrograph Opto-mechanical concepts PIERRE KARST, JEAN-LUC GIMENEZ CPPM(CNRS),FRANCE.
13,14 July 2005 Feasibilty/Concept Study Mid Term Status Review CCAT Enclosure Nathan Loewen AMEC Dynamic Structures Ltd. 13 July 2005.
EC: 7 DISK concept Preliminary considerations
CCAT Primary Mirror Panel Study
LHCb RICH2 Analysis of Super-Structure
Telescope - Mechanical
T2K Upgrade First look at TPC constraints (WAGASCI)
ob-fpc: Flexible printed circuits for the alice tracker
GLAST Large Area Telescope
Department of Physics, University of Michigan
SNAP NIR Detector Packaging Development: Universal SiC Package
Department of Physics, University of Michigan
Vertical-flexure CCD module: Thermal and Dynamic FEA
Space Frame Structures for SNAP: Another secondary structure…
THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM
Standardized CCD and MCT detector mounting configurations
Simplified Procedure Draft
Presentation transcript:

Another Modular Focal Plane: Part 2 – FP assembly Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/17/04

Modular focal plane assembly Motivations: install/remove single detectors from “front” of FP assemble detectors in modules of 3 x 3 simplify assembly, integration, and test reduce part counts, simplify part design simplify part fabrication individual module thermal control (Vis vs. IR) optimize materials for detector packages (CTE) local, discrete control of focal plane surface height minimize mechanical mass minimize thermal time constants minimize gravity deflections for ground testing maximize resonant frequencies

Focal Plane Baseplate Requirements: final focal plane flatness: +/- 25 microns detector temperature stability +/- 1K high stiffness – high first resonance This talk: sample base-plate designs two materials examined base-plate FEA

FP Baseplate design and FEA Design of baseplate consider Al 7075 and Moly MZT materials three mounting points to optics bench via bipods bipods not included in design or FEA cut-outs for detector access

Focal plane base-plate - front Note webs in access holes – not in FEA models

Focal plane base-plate - back Base-plate rib structure – simpler than FEA model

Focal plane fully populated

FP Baseplate design and FEA consider Al 7075 and Moly MZT materials Moly plate is 50 mm thick: 31 Kg Al. plate is 75 mm thick: 13 Kg sub-array loads modeled with point masses static and dynamic analyses completed

FP Baseplate FEA rib thickness: red - 6 mm purple - 5 mm cyan - 6 mm blue - 10 mm

FP Baseplate FEA sub-modules as point masses 1.0 kg 0.5 kg 16 Kg total sub- module mass

FP Baseplate FEA – Al 7075 (meters) Gy, Y deflections – 1.8 microns max

FP Baseplate FEA – Al 7075 (meters) Gy, Z deflections – 2.1 microns PV

FP Baseplate FEA – Al 7075 (meters) Gz, Z deflections – 4.8 microns

FP Baseplate FEA – Al 7075 Mode/Freq. 227 Hz 238 Hz 261 Hz 325 Hz Dynamic analysis – first mode

FP Baseplate FEA – MZT (meters) Gy, Y deflections – 0.8 microns PV

FP Baseplate FEA – MZT (meters) Gy, Z deflections – 1.1 microns PV

FP Baseplate FEA – MZT (meters) Gz, Z deflections – 4.2 microns PV

FP Baseplate FEA – MZT Mode/Freq. 249 Hz 258 Hz 290 Hz 491 Hz 654 Hz Dynamic analysis – first mode

Baseplate FEA Summary Mat. Mass Thick Gy-Uy Gy-Uz Gz-Uz Fn Al 7075 227 Hz MZT 31 Kg 50 mm 0.8um 1.1um 4.2um 249 Hz

FP Modular Baseplate Conclusions: sample designs stiff, high resonances flatness specs met in two orientations (and probably all) consider other substrate materials (Ti, CF)? refine interfaces spectrograph, BITE sources, cryostat mounts thermal links, detect. wiring, baffles, shields optimize design for loads and material (ribs, thicknesses, etc)