Education Law and Policy in the United States: Success & Challenges Sital Kalantry Associate Clinical Professor of Law.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Every Principal Needs to Know About Special Education
Advertisements

AfriMAP’s The Justice Sector and the Rule of Law in Namibia
1 Getting to the Core of the Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for Policy and Practice Advanced Literacy Panel.
PRIORITIES IN SECONDARY EDUCATION ANDRES R. ASSISTIN.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Overview of Education Litigation FEA Delegate Assembly October, 2012.
The Status of the Teaching Profession 2003 The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California State University, Office of the Chancellor Policy.
The Instructional Program
* * 0 PUBLIC EDUCATION FINANCE IN PENNSYLVANIA: UNEQUAL AND INADEQUATE Prepared by The Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia March 2008.
Educating Every Student An overview of educational investments for the future and New York State’s funding failure Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
On 21 November 2013, at the Hilton Hotel, Abuja, Nigeria.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Competition and Education Policy The Role of Vouchers and the No Child Left Behind Act.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Human Rights Strategic Litigation. What is strategic litigation? litigation, which aims to reach behind the individual case and client to achieve change.
Orientation to the Social Studies K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
Constitutional Law Part 2: The Federal Legislative Power Lecture 8: Post-Civil War Amendments (13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments)
Theme: Basics of administrative law.
The Federal Courts Agenda Quiz Overview of the Judicial Court System
The Supreme Court at Work
Comprehensive Sex Education and Academic Success Michelle R Miklinski Liberty University.
Schoolwide Program Presentation New England Comprehensive Assistance Center Steve Hamilton.
Technology Leadership
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Oregon Department of Education Agency Overview Susan Castillo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Patrick Burk, Deputy Superintendent Mike Greenfield,
Power and Control at State and National Levels: Political Party Platforms and High- Stakes Testing Chapter 9 ©2012 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights.
 ESL program is one that “provides instruction in the English language and other courses of study using teaching techniques for acquiring English, and...
Chapter 13 Finance School Funding and Taxes The power of taxation for education resides with the state limited only by federal and state constitution.
Social & Political Problems of African Americans Gilded Age Unit 2 Lesson 3.
History and Mission Kentucky’s Family Resource and Youth Services Centers March 25, 2008.
Benchmarking for Success: Ensuring U.S. Students Receive a World-Class Education Presentation to the North Carolina Accountability Conference February.
Gayle is…. Former HS social studies teacher Former HS administrator Associate Professor Cohort leader Social Studies Instruction/technology Past President.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Chapter 16 The Road Ahead in School Finance This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by.
Final Review Day 2: Education in America. Problems with American Education -Currently 68% of students in high school will graduate -Dropping out of high.
What is a Title I? Title I is Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of This program provides financial assistance to states.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Laws Governing ESL Programs in the US Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
October 6, SubjectGrade Level(s)Benchmark Reading3-575% Math3-570% VA History470% Science570% Discontinued State Tests (As of Spring 2015) 3 rd.
® [Insert your presentation title here]. ® ASCD: A Worldwide Community of Educators.
INCLUSION AND THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION: ARTICLE 24 OF THE CRPD UN HQ, New York, 2nd September Ana Peláez Narváez, Vice-Chairperson, CRPD Committee.
LEVERAGING THE PRIVATE SECTOR FOR RESULTS IN EDUCATION A World Bank Seminar Washington, D.C., March 30-31, 2010 Chito B. Salazar, Ph.D. President, Philippine.
COLLABORATING WITH YOUR SCHOOL BOARD AND SITE BASED DECISION MAKING COUNCIL Jackie R. Walters, MBA, RD.
October 26,  FCSD Shared Decision Making Model The State of the District-The Big Picture District Guiding Principles Regents Reform Agenda FCSD.
Equity Trial Abbeville County School District, et al vs. The State of South Carolina.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
The Hobgoblin of Finance Reform Finance almost always involve how monies are procured, distributed, and with what accountability. Funding Public education.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL INFLUENCE ON EDUCATION.
Indian Education for All History Presented by Jeredene Mayfield Montana’s North Central Education Service Region (MNCESR) February 2007.
The NCLB Act Closing the Achievement Gap in America’s Public Schools.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Sticking to Our Goals: Scholars and Donors as Agents of Women’s Empowerment and Sustainable Development The Global Women’s Fund of the Episcopal Diocese.
FUNDING LEGISLATION FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL. CONTRIBUTIONS TO EDUCATION- 07/08 vs. 08/09  8%- Federal funds  State funds07/08  43%- State funds07/08.
Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters Parent Action Conference November 7, 2015 CLASS SIZE: WHERE ARE WE NOW; WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
STRATEGIC PLAN October 8, OVERARCHING GOAL Increase Student Achievement.
DH STANTON ELEMENTARY.
MIDDLETOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Civil Rights Decision-Making
SPECIAL SCHOOLS DIANA GARZONA Edu
INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT
Mr. Vaton Durguti (Court President, Basic Court of Gjakova)
Presentation transcript:

Education Law and Policy in the United States: Success & Challenges Sital Kalantry Associate Clinical Professor of Law

2 Presentation Title

Achievement Gap: High School Completion Rate

Achievement Gap: 4 th Grade Reading & 8 th Grade Math

Litigation on Education Rights in the U.S. Equality arguments in Federal Courts Equality Argument in State Courts Adequate Funding Arguments in State Courts

State Constitutional Provisions New Yorks constitution: New York The legislature shall provide for the maintenance and support of a system of free common schools, wherein all the children of this state may be educated. Ohios constitution requires the State to provide a through and efficient system of common schools throughout the state.

Standards-based Education Policy 1989: The President convened governors of all 50 states and CEOs to help identify what to do about the fact that U.S. students were lagging behind students in some other countries (Japan). The group issues a report called Nation-at-Risk that identified indicators/standards that would be used to measure success/failure of a school. As a result of this movement, nearly all states by the 1990s created their own standards (such as high school completion rate) and their own benchmarks (such as 90%) and then identified that was needed to reach those standards, including the proper training of teachers capable of providing instruction aligned with those standards; and to provide the curricula or curricular guidelines, as well as the books, facilities, and other resources, necessary for proper instruction in accordance with the standards.

Overview of Litigation Strategy & State Court Decisions Advocates argued that schools systems in the State failed to provide adequate or sound education to students as required by the State constitutions. They wanted the State to provide more funding to schools so that students could receive an adequate or sound education. States had developed indicators/standards to measure school performance (such as test scores, drop-out rate, teacher performance). States had also set benchmarks for those indicators (e.g., students should receive at least a 80 score on a test). Courts found that the schools in the States did not satisfy the standards set by the State (e.g., the majority of students scoring below 80). Thus, courts found a violation of Constitutions education provision Remedies: State must propose a plan that would provide adequate funding to schools so that students receive an adequate education.

First State Courts Case Using Adequacy Claim Kentucky Supreme Court (1989) in Rose v. Council for Better Education, the court found that Kentuckys entire school system was inadequate and unconstitutional and directed the legislature to re-created, and re-establish a system of common schools. »Sufficient oral and written communication skills to enable students to function in a complex and rapidly changing civilization. »Sufficient knowledge of economic, social, and political systems to enable students to make informed choices. »Sufficient understanding of government processes to enable the student to understand the issues that affect his or her community, state, and nation. »Sufficient self-knowledge and knowledge of his or her mental and physical wellness. »Sufficient grounding in the arts to enable each student to appreciate his or her cultural and historical heritage. »Sufficient training or preparation for advanced training to enable each student to choose and pursue life work intelligently. »Sufficient training in either academic or vocational skills to enable public school students to compete with their counterparts in other states.

New York Court Adequacy Case »In 1993, a coalition of organizations formed campaign for Fiscal equity to mount a legal challenge to NYSs system for funding public education. »The high court considered the indicators (such as drop out rate and teacher performance) and determined that the NYC public school system did not provide a sound basic education as required by the State Constitution. »The court dismissed NYCs argument that the low test results and graduation rates related to immigrant children and lack of the culture of education in minority communities. »In 1995, the court ordered to state government to 1) determine the costs of providing a sound basic education, 2) devise a funding plan that would ensure a sound basic education and 3) adopt a system of accountability to ensure these reforms are implemented. »The governor of NY said that $5 billion dollars was needed to improve the NYC public school system so that the schools could satisfy the quantitative indicators proposed by the State.

Lessons Learned from U.S. Experience »Boot-strapping: Give education rights more teeth by tying them to other constitutional rights such as right to vote, free speech, and right to defend oneself in a criminal trial. »Indicators-based arguments: -In defining the content of the constitutional right to education, use quantitative indicators (such as literacy rate and test scores). -Compare these indicators against benchmarks set for them by the state (such as 80% or 90 for test scores). -Argue for constitutional violations where those benchmarks are not satisfied. »Democratic Engagement: To combat arguments that when courts adjudicate these issues, they impede on the legislative functions, employ a coalition-building democratic process.