Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Structure of the Rab7:REP-1 Complex
Xue Q. Gong, Chunfen Zhang, Michael Feig, Zachary F. Burton 
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Einav Gross, David B Kastner, Chris A Kaiser, Deborah Fass  Cell 
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Choel Kim, Cecilia Y. Cheng, S. Adrian Saldanha, Susan S. Taylor  Cell 
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Structural Basis for Substrate Selection by T7 RNA Polymerase
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Specificity Determinants in Phosphoinositide Dephosphorylation
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Direct Evaluation of tRNA Aminoacylation Status by the T-Box Riboswitch Using tRNA- mRNA Stacking and Steric Readout  Jinwei Zhang, Adrian R. Ferré-D’Amaré 
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 118, Issue 3, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Jingqi Duan, Ling Li, Jing Lu, Wei Wang, Keqiong Ye  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Gerd Prehna, Maya I. Ivanov, James B. Bliska, C. Erec Stebbins  Cell 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Srabani Mukherjee, Luis G. Brieba, Rui Sousa  Cell 
Translocation of σ70 with RNA Polymerase during Transcription
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Maria Spies, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Molecular Cell 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages 351-363 (August 2005) Allosteric Modulation of the RNA Polymerase Catalytic Reaction Is an Essential Component of Transcription Control by Rifamycins  Irina Artsimovitch, Marina N. Vassylyeva, Dmitri Svetlov, Vladimir Svetlov, Anna Perederina, Noriyuki Igarashi, Naohiro Matsugaki, Soichi Wakatsuki, Tahir H. Tahirov, Dmitry G. Vassylyev  Cell  Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages 351-363 (August 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.014 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Inhibition of E. coli RNAP by Rifs In Vitro Depends on Their Mode of Tail Attachment (A) Two classes of rifamycins with tails attached to C3 (red, RFP—rifampicin, RPN—rifapentin) and C3/C4 (blue, RFB—rifabutin, RMX—rifamexyl) positions of the ansa ring (naphtohydroquinonic chromophore spanned by an aliphatic bridge). (B) RNA synthesis as a function of Rifs’ concentrations. (Top) A representative gel panel, (bottom) effects of Rif tail (shown on the right) on ApUpCpG and ApUpC synthesis. The error bars are omitted for clarity; the error was within 10% between three independent titrations. Cell 2005 122, 351-363DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Structures of RNAP/Rifs Complexes (A–C) Experimental 3.5 Å resolution |Fnati − FRPN| (A) (3.5σ level), and |FRPN − Fnati| (B) and |FRFB − Fnati| (C) (3.0σ level both) omit ED maps (green) superimposed on the RNAP1/Rifs structures. (D) Superposition of the RPN (magenta) and RFB (green) atomic models. The RNAP1 structure is shown by the white ribbon diagram, the active-site Asp side chains (cyan) are represented by a balls-and-sticks model. In this and the following structural figures, the same color scheme is used for the RNAP subunits and the Rifs’ atomic models: β—light yellow, β′—white, Rifs—pink. Cell 2005 122, 351-363DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 RNAP/Rifs Binding Residues making polar (cyan) and hydrophobic (green) interactions with the Rifs’ ansa ring are shown. (A) The Rif-resistant substitutions characterized in this study are shown on top of the sequence alignment between E. coli and T. thermophilus β subunits. (B and C) Three-dimensional stereo (RNAP1/RPN model was used) and schematic drawings show the RNAP/ansa ring hydrogen bonding using the cyan dashed lines or arrows, and the van der Waals contacts using green dashed lines. Cell 2005 122, 351-363DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Interactions of the σΔHL with Rifs and Effects on Transcription (A and B) Interactions of the σHL (magenta) with the RPN/RFB ansa ring in RNAP1 (A) and with the RFB tail in RNAP2 (B). (C) Effects of the σΔHL and βS531F substitution on ApUpCpG and ApUpC synthesis at the T7A1 promoter upon addition of RPN or RFB to 10 μg/ml. Data shown are the mean and SD (n = 3). Cell 2005 122, 351-363DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Increased Levels of Mg2+ Ion Protect RNAP against Inhibition by Rifs (A) Mg-dependent survival of the E. coli cells carrying the plasmid-encoded IPTG-inducible rpoBN518D allele (see Experimental Procedures) in the absence or in the presence of RFP (50 mg/l); MgSO4 was added to 25 mM. (B) Effect of Mg2+ concentration on RNA synthesis in the presence of Rifs and RFP binding in vitro. Synthesis of the halted A29 transcription complexes was measured on pIA171 template with 100 μM ApU, 2.5 μM GTP, 1 μM CTP, 10 μCi of [α32P]-CTP (3000 Ci/mmol) at 37°C for 15 min in TGA buffer containing different concentrations of Mg2+. Inhibition of A29 RNA synthesis by Rifs (relative to A29 synthesis in the absence of inhibitor, defined as 0% inhibition) was determined with RFB at 1 μg/ml (filled circles), RFP at 0.5 μg/ml (filled triangles), or RPN at 0.5 μg/ml (open circles). To determine retention of 3H-labeled RFP (filled squares), stable initiation complexes were formed on pIA171 template during 15 min incubation at 37°C in the presence of 100 μM ApU; the concentration of Mg2+ was then adjusted between 0.4 and 10 mM and RFP retention was measured as described in Experimental Procedures. Binding at 0.4 mM Mg2+ was taken as 100%. Data shown are the average and spread of two measurements. Cell 2005 122, 351-363DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 β Subunit-Mediated Allosteric Signal (A) A putative three-dimensional trace (stereo) of the signal (red arrows) that originates from the set of polar residues in the Rif binding site (cyan) and is transmitted to the active site (white) through the intervening hydrophobic cluster (green). A model of the 4 bp (second bond is formed) RNA/DNA hybrid (yellow/red) with the 5′-terminal RNA NTP (orange) is superimposed on the RNAP/RPN structure. (B) Substitutions that disrupt Rif binding (βQ513P, βS531F) and the allosteric pathway (βL1325A) grow in the presence of RFP. Serial dilutions of IPTG-induced cultures were plated on LB-Amp-IPTG in the absence and in the presence of 20 mg/l RFP and grown at 32°C. Pictures were taken after 43 hr incubation. (C) Both βQ513P and βL1325A enzymes are resistant to RFP in vitro, but only βL1325A retains RFP binding. Transcription was assayed on a T7A1 promoter encoded on a pIA171 template in the absence and in the presence of 2 μg/ml RFP, as described in the Figure 5 legend. Binding was assayed as described in Experimental Procedures. Data shown are the mean and SD (n = 3). Cell 2005 122, 351-363DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.014) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions