Government Services Identification And Prioritization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Advertisements

State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Slide 1 Course: Government Process Re-engineering Day 1 Session 4: Definition of the Vision & Understanding Service Prioritisation.
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
EForms and Service Delivery through State Portal & SSDG Kavita Bhatia.
ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Presentation to the Governor’s Water Summit April 17, 2007 Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch and Diane.
Moving from money well accounted for to money well spent UK Information Technology Summit May 2005 Helen McDonald A/Chief Information Officer Treasury.
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Slide 1 Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 2 Session 3 Service Identification & Prioritization.
Orientation Training for District e-Governance Managers CM SSSM.
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
ROLE OF INFORMATION IN MANAGING EDUCATION Ensuring appropriate and relevant information is available when needed.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
EForms Project Details and Implementation Shri Shankar Aggarwal, Joint Secretary, National eGovernance Plan.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
Lecture 4. IS Planning & Acquisition To be covered: To be covered: – IS planning and its importance Cost-benefit analysis Cost-benefit analysis Funding.
Maximizing the Value of Investments in Tax Administration Terry Lutes Principal, M Group.
Strategies for Knowledge Management Success SCP Best Practices Showcase March 18, 2004.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Plug-In B2 Business Process (on OLC)
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program January 17, 2002 eGovernment Executive Council Chris Niedermayer, USDA eGovernment Executive Barbara.
1% Sales Tax Commission Board Meeting June 3, 2015.
ESCAPES: Improving the student work placement experience Sandra Winfield and Kirstie Coolin, Centre for International ePortfolio Development, University.
Copyright , Government of India (DietY) All rights reserved Department of Electronics & Information Technology Ministry of communications.
Business Management March 2, 2017, Marketing.
JMFIP Financial Management Conference
Process 4 Hours.
Make or Buy transport.
Strategic Information Systems Planning
Introduction to The Rational IT Model
Maintenance BC - NZTA assessment in TIO
ITIL SERVICE LIFECYCLE
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
Quiz Contest To check Entry level behaviour for participants on the session : “Services Identification & Prioritization in the context of e Gov”
TECHNOLOGY PLUG-IN T12 BUSINESS PROCESS.
How to Assess the Effectiveness of Your Language Access Program
Project Management and Monitoring & Evaluation
SAMPLE Develop a Comprehensive Competency Framework
2nd Agricultural Climate Change Strategy
The Systems Engineering Context
Applying Business Process Re-engineering
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Improving Mission Effectiveness By Exploiting the Command’s Implementation Of the DoD Enterprise Services Management Framework - DESMF in the [name the.
Improve Business Satisfaction by 10% Through Business Relationship Management Relationship management is the #1 driver of business satisfaction with IT.
Data Sharing Consultation Event
Object oriented system development life cycle
Chapter 5 Planning.
TSMO Program Plan Development
Change Agents Why your Transformational IT Initiative Will Fail Without Them Terri Campbell Sr. Director of Change Leadership.
Script-less Automation: An Approach to Shift-Left.
MGT 498 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
MGT 498 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Joan Angel Deputy Registrar, Student Administration HOSA 2018
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Research Program Strategic Plan
Is there another way besides accreditation?
Program Strategy and Implementation Plan
Internet Interconnection
Software life cycle models
Government Services Identification and Prioritization
Opening seminar of the project
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Define Your IT Strategy
Time Scheduling and Project management
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Government Services Identification And Prioritization 29th September, 2016 B Krishnamurthy (BKM)

Agenda Categories of Government Service Prioritization of Services Service Prioritization Framework

Government Service Categories Government to Citizen (G2C) Government to Business (G2B) Government to Government (G2G) – INTERNAL Government to Government G2G – EXTERNAL Government to Employees (G2E)

What is a Government Service? Service is the ‘action or process of serving’ or ‘an act of assistance’ or ‘a system providing a public need’. Process consisting of a series of intangible activities that normally, but not necessarily always, takes place in interactions between the provider and consumer Government is into the business of addressing the needs of citizen through the lifecycle Governments interact with citizens to provide ‘services’ Every government department provides a set of services to its identified customer base. The delivery of such services would develop an image of the government among the customers and so making the delivery of services customer-friendly 1. Develop an understanding that the government service is a ‘process’

Government Service Classification Information Services Includes those services that solely provide ‘information’ to customers and does not involve processing of any transactions or documents. Information services have relatively simple back-office operations and can be easily be e-Government-enabled Transaction Services Transactional Services: includes those services where customers require specific actions to be taken by the department. Transactional services mandate a higher degree of customer interaction and more complex delivery operations than informational services. 1. Informational Services: includes those services that solely provide information to customers and does not involve processing of any transactions or documents. For example, advertising the bus routes of public transport. Informational services have relatively simple back-office operations and can be easily be E-Government-enabled. 2. Transactional Services: includes those services where customers require specific actions to be taken by the department. For example, issue of a driving license. Transactional services mandate a higher degree of customer interaction and more complex delivery operations than informational services. 3. Foundation Services; includes those support services that are critical for effective customer relationship management and are common across all departments. These services include Service Directory, Complaints Filing, Performance Evaluation and Follow-up and Tracking. Foundation services represent the basic minimum customer requirements for each transactional service. 4. ‘Breadth of Access’; provides a qualitative review of the breadth of services and information which can be accessed by the customer through a specific delivery channel. 5. ‘Depth of Delivery’; provides a qualitative review of the depth of process that is simplified / automated for service delivery through a delivery channel.

Consider the e-Governance Evolution Model Seamless service impartment across departments and customized information and services as per citizen’s requirements leading to real time integration Collaboration between departments and sharing of services/ information Transformation 2B Transaction Two way transaction between Government and Stakeholders (Citizens , Businesses, Employees) 2A Degree of Change to Business Interaction Publishing of information/ services 1B The e-governance model provides a basic approach for prioritization of services, that is in terms of evolving from ‘information’ to ‘interaction’ to ‘transaction’ to finally transformation. Information 1A Enabler Transformer 1 2 Role of e-Governance Does this model give suggestions for prioritization of services?

Government Services Lifecycle Procedures for availing service Submission of Application Issue certificate/ permission/ information Availability of Forms Application processing Application tracking The service Lifecycle consists of a number of stages. It is important to ensure the perfect readiness at every stage

If not, than in what sequence? How will you go about improving the various Services provided by your Department to the various Stakeholders? Can all the services be taken for improvement under e-Governance at the same time? NO The participants must understand that due to resource limitations and time available all the services can not be converted into e-governance mode at the same time. It is therefore essential to have a systematic approach for prioritization of the services to be put under e-governance mode If not, than in what sequence? Who & how to decide the importance of the various Services provided by the Department?

Service Prioritization Identification of priority areas / services for e- Governance Phasing of services for implementation under e- Governance based on priorities Need for Services View To identify stakeholders To assess the clear needs of services To understand information and transaction needs of stakeholders To design the projects to deliver the information needs and transaction services of stakeholders Need for Priorisation To demonstrate early results To minimize the impact and maximise the results Limited resources and capacities existing with (funds and skill sets) Readiness of stakeholders

Some Considerations For Services Prioritization Needs enabling efforts only to improve the service Needs transforming efforts also to improve the service How important is it the service - criticality How valuable is the service to department/citizen What is the visibility of the service – numbers affected How difficult is to change the service in e-Gov mode – complexity Can the service be changed to e-Gov mode – technical feasibility These are some other considerations for service prioritization.

Service Prioritization Framework Approach for Service Prioritization 1 Compile The List of Services 2 Collect statistics and information about your services 3 Identify High Value Services which need to be e-Governance-enabled 4 Prioritize the implementation of the high-value services 5 Validate and rationalize the results

Service Prioritization Framework Step 1: Compile the list of services Identify the stakeholders addressed/served by the department First level of classification (citizens, businesses, employees, other governments) Sub-classification (e.g. of citizens served by Education Dept) – Parents, Higher education level students, university level students, private college owners Identification of department functions/services to the stakeholder groups Identification of list of information and transaction services stakeholder wise

Service Prioritization Framework Step 2: Collect information & statistics about the various services Collection of various operational information and statistics for the list of services identified in Step 1. Illustrative Information and statistics for each service include: Transaction volumes Frequency of transactions Transaction processing time Number of customer visits Time spent by the customer for follow-up and track progress

Service Prioritization Framework Step 2: Collect information & statistics about the various services ` Transaction volumes (per year) Frequency Processing time Birth registration 10,000 Once in lifetime 1 day Death registration 4,000 Property tax assessment 3000 2 days Property tax collection 100000 Twice in a year 30 minutes Issuing building permission 1000 10 days Vacant Land Tax Assessment 10 Vacant Land Collection 100 Once in a year Court cases NA Water tap connection Water tax payment 250000 Once in a month Illustrative analysis of Municipal Services

Service Prioritization Framework Step 3: Identify The High Value Services Which Need To Be Transformed Into e-Governance Department Value Measures Enhancing existing revenues; Setting up new revenue streams; Reducing cost of processing transactions; and Delivering intangible benefits (e.g. boosting the image of the department) Citizen Value Measures Minimizing the number of customer visits Reducing the time required for service Reducing the fees and charges associated with a service; Reducing the time spent by the customer to follow-up and track the progress Reducing the time spend by the customer to file complaints, comments and suggestions The first major criteria for priority is the ‘value’ of the service for the citizens and the department. Assessment of services to identify those services that once made E-governance-enabled will deliver the maximum value to the ‘department’ and its ‘citizens’

Service Prioritization Framework Step 3: Identify The High Value Services Which Need To Be Transformed Into e-Governance Measures for Value to Citizen Minimizing the number of customer visits to the department Reducing the time required to deliver a service Reducing the time spent by the customer for follow-up and track progress of the requested service Reducing the time spent by the customer to file complaints. Value to Citizen Value to Department 1 2 3 4 LOW HIGH Measures for Value to Department Reducing cost of processing transactions Delivering intangible benefits Increase transaction volumes

Service Prioritization Framework Step 4: Prioritize The Implementation of The High Value Services Identify when to implement each of the high value services identified for the department The implementation priority for each high value service was defined based on the analysis of service visibility and service complexity 1. The second important criteria is in terms of its ‘visibility’ and ‘complexity’ when implemented.

Service Prioritization Framework Step 4: Prioritize The Implementation of The High Value Services Service Visibility Describes how significantly and extensively can customers feel and experience the benefits achieved from delivering the service into e-Governance. Services of high volume of transactions and a large customer base would be more visible to the Department customers than other services with a very limited customer base. Service Complexity Describes how easy the service can be made E-governance-enabled. Depends on a number of factors such as the degree of existing automation, number of external parties involved and the number of customer documents processed.

Service Prioritization Framework Step 4: Prioritize The Implementation of The High Value Services Measures for Service visibility Volume of transactions Customer base Intangible benefits Service Visibility Service Complexity 1 3 2 4 LOW HIGH Measures for Service Complexity Degree of existing automations Number of external agencies involved Number of customer documents processed VISIBILITY VS. COMPLEXITY

Service Prioritization Framework Step 4: Prioritize The Implementation of The High Value Services Evaluate potential applications and e-Government services based on their criticality and feasibility and prioritize the funding of those services based on the following framework: Service Feasibility Service Criticality 1 3 4 2 LOW HIGH The third important criteria is in terms of the ‘feasibility’ and ‘criticality’ of the service when implemented. Defer – If there is low criticality and low feasibility, the application should not be undertaken. Low criticality implies little gain and low feasibility implies relatively high risk. Permit – If there is low criticality but high feasibility, Govt. should allow the development of the application as long as it follows the Standards and Guidelines and uses the overall infrastructure. Low criticality implies little gain, but high feasibility implies relatively few risks. This type of project should be allowed. Pursue – If there is high criticality but low feasibility, Govt. should allow the application to be built. High criticality implies that there is customer demand for such a service or that significant benefits could be realized from this application, but low feasibility implies that there may be significant risks. Target – If there is high criticality and high feasibility, Govt. should build this application. High criticality implies customer demand and benefits and high feasibility implies relatively few risks in pursuing this application. FEASIBILITY VS. CRITICALITY

Service Prioritization Framework Step 5: Validate and Rationalize The Results Validate the identified services/projects for e-Governance through department’s survey, experience and knowledge of the customers Verify that the high-value services can deliver benefits through e-governance. Verify the feasibility of the implementation priorities assigned to the high-value services

Service Prioritization Framework Benefits of Service Prioritization: Identifies the services which are crucial to the stakeholders and which requires immediate IT enablement Enables process efficiency to the high priority services Increased user value and satisfaction Reduced administrative burden Strategic Fit with e-government strategy Increased visibility of efforts and benefits, which can be showcased for buy-in for subsequent efforts 1. Before any service is taken up for conversion into e-governance mode process reengineering must be carried out. For the PRIORITIZED SERVICES, perform GPR first before they are automated

Thank you bkm.krishnamurthy@gmail.com bkmurthy@bkms.in