Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e3 (September 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transient Membrane Localization of SPV-1 Drives Cyclical Actomyosin Contractions in the C. elegans Spermatheca  Pei Yi Tan, Ronen Zaidel-Bar  Current.
Advertisements

A Robust Network of Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways Governs Genome Integrity during C. elegans Development  Daphne B. Pontier, Marcel Tijsterman 
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis Persists during Unperturbed Mitosis
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Caenorhabditis elegans TAC-1 and ZYG-9 Form a Complex that Is Essential for Long Astral and Spindle Microtubules  Martin Srayko, Sophie Quintin, Anne.
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Transcriptional Memory in the Drosophila Embryo
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Kai Yuan, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology 
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e4 (September 2018)
Drosophila fizzy-related Down-Regulates Mitotic Cyclins and Is Required for Cell Proliferation Arrest and Entry into Endocycles  Stephan J Sigrist, Christian.
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Transcription in the Absence of Histone H3.2 and H3K4 Methylation
Volume 19, Issue 20, Pages (November 2009)
Adrian Halme, Michelle Cheng, Iswar K. Hariharan  Current Biology 
Multiple Mechanisms Contribute to Centriole Separation in C. elegans
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (February 2017)
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Spindle Checkpoint Protein Dynamics at Kinetochores in Living Cells
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Differential Activation of the DNA Replication Checkpoint Contributes to Asynchrony of Cell Division in C. elegans Embryos  Michael Brauchle, Karine Baumer,
Leah Vardy, Terry L. Orr-Weaver  Developmental Cell 
A GABAergic Feedback Shapes Dopaminergic Input on the Drosophila Mushroom Body to Promote Appetitive Long-Term Memory  Alice Pavlowsky, Johann Schor,
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages (March 2015)
Maintenance of Miranda Localization in Drosophila Neuroblasts Involves Interaction with the Cognate mRNA  Anne Ramat, Matthew Hannaford, Jens Januschke 
Cell-Nonautonomous Regulation of C. elegans Germ Cell Death by kri-1
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
The Mitotic Arrest in Response to Hypoxia and of Polar Bodies during Early Embryogenesis Requires Drosophila Mps1  Matthias G. Fischer, Sebastian Heeger,
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Intra-spindle Microtubule Assembly Regulates Clustering of Microtubule-Organizing Centers during Early Mouse Development  Sadanori Watanabe, Go Shioi,
The POU/Oct Transcription Factor Nubbin Controls the Balance of Intestinal Stem Cell Maintenance and Differentiation by Isoform-Specific Regulation  Xiongzhuo.
Heidi S. Bretscher, Donald T. Fox  Developmental Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Premature Sister Chromatid Separation Is Poorly Detected by the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint as a Result of System-Level Feedback  Mihailo Mirkovic, Lukas H.
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Jan H. Reiling, Kathrin T. Doepfner, Ernst Hafen, Hugo Stocker 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages e4 (April 2019)
Raquel A. Oliveira, Kim Nasmyth  Current Biology 
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages 2837-2844.e3 (September 2018) Absence of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Restores Mitotic Fidelity upon Loss of Sister Chromatid Cohesion  Rui D. Silva, Mihailo Mirkovic, Leonardo G. Guilgur, Om S. Rathore, Rui Gonçalo Martinho, Raquel A. Oliveira  Current Biology  Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages 2837-2844.e3 (September 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.062 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2018 28, 2837-2844.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.062) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 SAC Inhibition Modifies san RNAi-Induced Adult Wing Developmental Defects (A) Tissue-specific RNAi in the pouch of the larvae wing imaginal using the nubbin-Gal4 driver and the upstream activating sequence (UAS)/Gal4 system. (B) Adult wings of wild-type Drosophila (Oregon R) or Drosophila expressing a control RNAi (mCherry RNAi) or expressing RNAi for san in the larvae wing imaginal discs. (C) Representative adult Drosophila wing phenotypes co-expressing san RNAi with mCherry RNAi, mad2 RNAi, or mps1 RNAi in the larvae wing imaginal discs. (D) Adult wing phenotypic classes scored during the screen: class 1 (wild-type wings); class 2 (weak wing developmental defects); class 3 (san RNAi-like wing phenotype); class 4 (highly abnormal wings); and class 5 (absence or vestigial adult wings). Additional examples of the scored phenotypic classes are shown in [10]. (E) Quantification of Drosophila wing phenotypes expressing individual RNAi transgenes for control (mCherry), mad2, or mps1 (gray bars) or co-expressing san RNAi with control (mCherry) RNAi, mad2 RNAi, or mps1 RNAi (black bars) in the larvae wing imaginal discs, from the described screen. (F) Candidate gene analysis for enhancers/supressors of san RNAi. Quantification of Drosophila wing phenotypes expressing individual RNAi transgenes for control (mCherry), bubR1, mad1, fzy, and cdc23 (gray bars) or co-expressing san RNAi with control (mCherry) RNAi, bubR1 RNAis, mad1 RNAis, fzy RNAi, and cdc23 RNAi (black bars) in the larvae wing imaginal discs. bubR1 RNAi1, bubR1 RNAi2, mad1 RNAi1, and mad1 RNAi2 correspond to the TRiP RNAis GL00236, GLV21065, GLV21088, and HMC03671, respectively. The average phenotypic class of control and san RNAi and control RNAi (E and F) is the same. Phenotypic quantification of adult wings is mean ± SD of three independent experiments and is based on the classes described in (D) (∗∗∗p < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test; n represents the total number of scored flies). See also Figure S1, Table S1, and Data S1. Current Biology 2018 28, 2837-2844.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.062) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Inhibition of the SAC in Wing Imaginal Discs Alleviates Mitotic Errors Caused by Premature Loss of Cohesin (A) Images from movies of the wing disc pouch in the control, san RNAi, and san and mad2 RNAi strains. Strains contained HisH2Av-RFP (red) and Cid-EGFP (green). Times are relative to NEBD. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (B) Quantification of mitotic duration in control, san RNAi, or san and mad2 RNAi strains. The duration of mitosis was measured from nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) to nuclear envelope formation (NEF) using H2Av-RFP channel. Images were taken every 2 min. Each dot represents an individual cell and lines represent mean ± SD (n = 71/5 for control, 77/5 for san RNAi, and 124/5 for san+mad2 RNAi; n = number of cells and number of independent discs). (C) Images from movies of the wing disc from strains surviving solely on TEV-cleavable Rad21 (Rad21TEV) with and without heat-shock-induced TEV protease cleavage, in strains wild-type or homozygous mutant for the mad2 gene. Strains also expressed HisH2Av-RFP (red) for visualization of mitotic duration and phenotype. Times are relative to NEBD. The scale bar represents 5 μm. (D) Quantification of mitotic duration of the no TEV control upon TEV-protease-mediated cleavage of Rad21TEV, upon TEV-protease-mediated cleavage of Rad21TEV in a mad2 mutant background, and in a mad2 mutant without cohesin cleavage but after heat shock. The duration of mitosis was measured from NEBD to NEF using H2AvD-mRFP1. Images were taken every 2 or 3 min. Each dot represents an individual cell, and lines represent mean ± SD (n = 27/4 for Rad21TEV − TEV [no heat shock (HS)], 46/8 for Rad21TEV + TEV, 46/4 for Rad21TEV+TEV in a mad2P background, and 60/4 for mad2P after HS; n = number of cells and number of independent discs). (E) Representative images of mitotic cells from san RNAi undergoing mitosis with normal and defective mitotic exit. The scale bar represents 5 μm and applies to all images. Graph represents the quantification of mitotic defects observed in the different experimental conditions as mean ± SEM of errors of individual discs (n ≥ 4 independent discs corresponding to over 50 cells analyzed per experimental condition). (F) Quantification of centromere (cid-EGFP-labeled) segregation assymetry in the different experimental conditions; graph represents segregation symmetry index per cell calculated as the area of pole A (with higher area) divided by area of pole B (lower area), as illustrated on the left (n ≥ 4 independent discs corresponding to over 50 cells analyzed per experimental condition). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test. See also Figure S2 and Videos S1 and S2. Current Biology 2018 28, 2837-2844.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.062) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Inhibition of the SAC in Syncytial Blastoderm Embryos Alleviates Mitotic Errors Caused by Premature Loss of Cohesin (A) Embryos surviving solely on Rad21TEV either non-injected (up) or injected with 5 mg/mL TEV protease (middle and bottom panels). Embryos are derived from females that are wild-type or homozygous mutant for mad2 gene and express HisH2Av-RFP (red) and Cid-EGFP (green). Images were taken every 30 s, and times are relative to NEBD. The scale bar represents 10 μm. (B) Quantification of mitotic duration in un-injected embryos and embryos injected with TEV protease in strains containing solely Rad21TEV and wild-type or mutant for mad2. The duration of mitosis was measured from NEBD to NEF using HisH2Av-RFP. Images were taken every 30 s. Each dot represents a single mitosis, and lines represent mean ± SD (n = 20/4 for Rad21TEV no TEV, 40/8 for Rad21TEV + TEV, and 55/11 for Rad21TEV+TEV in a mad2P background; n = number of mitosis and number of independent embryos). (C) Quantification of segregation asymmetry in control, cohesin cleavage, and cohesin cleavage in mad2 mutant background. Each value was quantified by normalizing the area of pole A (with higher area) and the area of pole B (lower area); (n = 46/5 for Rad21TEV no TEV, 60/6 for Rad21TEV + TEV, and 60/6 for Rad21TEV+TEV in a mad2P background; n = number of telophases and number of independent embryos); statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test. (D) Relative area of lagging centromeres in control, Rad21TEV + TEV protease, and Rad21TEV + TEV protease in a mad2 mutant background; statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test. (E) Kymographs of HisH2Av-RFP and Cid-EGFP of cells entering mitosis in control, cohesin cleavage, and cohesin cleavage in mad2 mutant background. Arrow points to centromere separation and arrowhead to the shuffling onset. The scale bars represent 5 min and 5 μm. (F) Quantification of time for chromosome shuffling onset upon TEV-mediated cohesin cleavage, relative to NEBD. Each dot represents a single dividing nuclei from >10 independent embryos. See also Figures S3 and S4 and Videos S3 and S4. Current Biology 2018 28, 2837-2844.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.062) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Inhibition of the SAC Suppresses Imaginal Wing Disc Apoptosis Caused by Premature Loss of Cohesin (A) Images of cleaved caspase-3 (CC3) immunofluorescence in controls (Rad21TEV without TEV and mad2P after HS), Rad21TEV + TEV protease, and Rad21TEV + TEV protease in mad2 mutant background after HS. The scale bar represents 100 μm. (B) Quantification of CC3-positive area of the entire wing disc, in the indicated experimental conditions; n ≥ 5 independent discs per experimental condition; statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test. (C) Representative images of CC3 immunofluorescence in control, san RNAi, and san and mad2 double RNAi. Scale bar indicates 100 μm. (D) Quantification of CC3-positive area of the wing disc pouch, in control, san, and san and mad2 RNAi; n ≥ 4 independent discs per experimental condition; multiple comparison analysis was perform using a one-way ANOVA test. Current Biology 2018 28, 2837-2844.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.062) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions