National Human Genome Research Institute National Institutes of Health The Future of the Research Exemption A Presentation to the Gene Patenting Roundtable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measures Necessary for the Balanced Co-Existence of Patents and Plant Breeders‘ Rights - From a European Perspective – Joseph Straus, Munich WIPO-UPOV.
Advertisements

Complexities of Designing a Research Exemption Arti K. Rai Professor, Duke Law School.
Research & Experimental Use of Patented Inventions Brian Opeskin Australian Law Reform Commission AAAS Workshop, Washington DC, October 2004.
Re-use of PSI Data Protection Issues Cécile de Terwangne Professor at the Law Faculty, Research Director at CRIDS University of Namur (Belgium) 2 nd LAPSI.
LAPSI 4th Thematic Seminar Muenster, January 27, 2011 Should the information held by research institutions be included in the EU Directive on PSI Re-use?
Patent Law Overview. Outline Effect of patent protection Effect of patent protection Substantive requirements for patent protection Substantive requirements.
Patents and Threats to Educational Institutions Joshua D. Sarnoff Washington College of Law American University Washington, DC, USA
An Economic Analysis of Patent Law Exemption for Research on a Patented Invention Reiko Aoki (Kyushu University, Hitotsubashi University, RIETI) Sadao.
Interface between patent and sui generis systems of protection of plant varieties The 1978 UPOV Act does not allow both systems to be applied to the same.
Patent Infringement—Statute Study 10 experts. Term of Protection Article 42 The duration of an invention patent shall be twenty years, the duration of.
MONSANTO v. SCHMEISER The U.S. Perspective 78 TH IPIC ANNUAL MEETING October 14 – 16, 2004 Bruce C. Haas.
DESIGN AND EUROPEAN LAW Two texts - Firstly a directive 98/71 in order to create a convergence between national laws - secondly a european protection :
The patentability of biotechnological inventions: The European Commission’s second 16c report Paul Van den Bulck Partner at Ulys Law Firm (Brussels) Lecturer.
Patents Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman. Pittman - Cyberlaw & E- Commerce 2 Legal Framework of Patents The U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8:
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 12, 2007 Patent – Defenses, Remedies.
Ownership of Computer Software Ethical Questions and Concerns.
Experimental Use Patent Law United States Patent 4,641,103 Madey, et al. February 3, 1987 Microwave electron gun Abstract An electron gun (10)
Indirect Infringement Prof Merges Agenda Indirect Liability Remedies (briefly)
Patents 101 April 1, 2002 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
The European legal framework for patentability and regulation of stem cells : focus on Germany, Spain and France Paul Van den Bulck Partner at Ulys Law.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Unless otherwise noted, the content of this course material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
SAREE AONGSOMWANG Foundation for Consumers, Thailand.
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Copyright & Licensing Ernie Howe & Karen Adams NEOS May, 2002.
Trademark II Infringement. Article 57 Infringement Article 57 Any of the following conduct shall be an infringement upon the right to exclusively use.
Oviedo Convention and Its Protocols – Impact on Polish Law International Bioethics Conference Oviedo Convention in Central and Eastern European Countries.
TRIPS Flexibilities P. Roffe ICTSD Bellagio, October 2007.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
Patent Law Presented by: Walker & Mann, LLP Walker & Mann, LLP 9421 Haven Ave., Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Office.
Liability and Redress: Overview and General Comments Asia Regional Workshop on the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety September 7-8, 2010 Daewoo Hotel, Hanoi,
Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
Dr. Marie Talnack, Director, TechnologyTransfer Office and Industry Clinic.
Patents Business of Biotechnology BIT 120. Definition Patent Government grants which provide inventors with right to exclude others from practicing invention.
The Need to Address Disclosure of Origin Requirements in Patent Law Harmonization Initiatives Joshua D. Sarnoff Washington College of Law American University.
Chapter 12 Intellectual Property McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Decision by the grand panel of the IP High Court (February 1, 2013) re calculation of damages based on infringer’s profits Yasufumi Shiroyama Japan Federation.
Dr. Thomas Pattloch, LL.M.Eur. The new Chinese Patent Law An overview Dr. Thomas Pattloch, LL.M.Eur., German Attorney at Law Senior Counsel TaylorWessing.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 24, 2009 Class 8 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (WTO TRIPS); Global Problem of Patent Protection for.
How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Professor Fischer CLASS of April THE LAST CLASS!!!
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
© J. Straus Patenting of Genes and Life Forms, and the impact of Patenting on Upstream Science Joseph Straus, Munich WIPO Open Forum on the Draft.
The Research Use Exception to Patent Infringement Earlier cases Whittemore v. Cutter 29 F. Cas (C.C.D. Mass. 1813) “It could never have been the.
INTERESTING AND PENDING DECISIONS FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JANUARY, 2004 Nanette S. Thomas Senior Intellectual Property Counsel Becton Dickinson and Company.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Intellectual Property Law Introduction Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
PATENTS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS Presented By: Navdeep World Trade Organization.
The EU and Access to Environmental Information Unit D4 European Commission, Directorate General for the Environment 1.
Paris Convention §5A “(1) Importation by the patentee into the country where the patent has been granted of articles manufactured in any of the countries.
15-16 May 2007Geertrui Van OverwalleEUPACO One size fits all? How unitary is the present European patent system? Geertrui Van Overwalle Centre for Intellectual.
Sharing Information (FERPA) FY07 REMS Initial Grantee Meeting December 5, 2007, San Diego, CA U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free.
The Third Revision of the Chinese Patent Law State Intellectual Property Office of P.R.C Dec
1 Part II Major Changes in the Third Revision of the Chinese Patent Law.
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
Intellectual Property
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
IP, Invention Disclosures and Commercialization
Patent law update.
Loss of Right Provisions
PATENT LAW TRENDS (walking around patent knowledge)
Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries on the Marrakesh Treaty and the Production and Exchange of Accessible Books by the World Intellectual Property.
Legal challenges facing franchising in Kenya
Documentaries, UPF, 19 April 2018
3D Printing and Patents Professor David C Musker
Dr. Achim Seiler, EU-Project” Support of Yemen’s Accession to the WTO”
Victoria Henson-Apollonio, Ph. D
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

National Human Genome Research Institute National Institutes of Health The Future of the Research Exemption A Presentation to the Gene Patenting Roundtable Washington, DC 4 December 2002

University of Maryland School of Law Lawrence M. Sung Assistant Professor of Law

University of Maryland School of Law Discussion Past Definition & Origin of Research Exemption Present Status Present Risk Calculus & Recognized Defenses International Standards Future

University of Maryland School of Law Definition Common law Distinct De minimis 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1) Plant Variety Protection Act Fair Use (copyright & trademark)

University of Maryland School of Law Origin [I]t could never have been the intention of the legislature to punish a man, who constructed such a machine merely for philosophical experiments, or for the purpose of ascertaining the sufficiency of the machine to produce its described effects. Whittemore v. Cutter, 29 F. Cas (C.C.D. Mass. 1813).

University of Maryland School of Law Past [A]n experiment with a patented article for the sole purpose of gratifying a philosophical taste, or curiosity, or for mere amusement is not an infringement of the rights of the patentee. Roche Prods., Inc. v. Bolar Pharm. Co., 733 F.2d 858, 862 (Fed. Cir. 1984) (citing Peppenhausen v. Falke, 19 Fed. Cas. 1048, 1049 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1861)).

University of Maryland School of Law Present Narrow scope Limited to actions performed for amusement, to satisfy idle curiosity, or for strictly philosophical inquiry. Madey v. Duke Univ., 307 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 3, 2002).

University of Maryland School of Law Madey v. Duke Univ. [U]ndertaken in the guise of scientific inquiry but has definite, cognizable, and not insubstantial commercial purposes. [I]f it has the slightest commercial implication. [I]n keeping with the legitimate business of the alleged infringer.... [T]he profit or non-profit status of the user is not determinative.

University of Maryland School of Law Madey v. Duke Univ. [M]ajor research universities... often sanction and fund research projects with arguably no commercial application whatsoever. However, these projects unmistakably further the institutions legitimate business objectives, including educating and enlightening students and faculty participating in these projects. These projects also serve, for example, to increase the status of the institution and lure lucrative research grants, students and faculty.

University of Maryland School of Law Present Experimentation Permissible Reproducibility Verification Impermissible Improvement Innovation

University of Maryland School of Law Present Landscape Risk calculus Recognized defenses 28 U.S.C. § 1498 March-in rights States 11 th Amendment immunity International Standards

University of Maryland School of Law EPO [R]ights conferred by a Community patent shall not extend to acts done for experimental purposes relating to the subject matter of the patented invention. Community Patent Convention Art. 27(b)

University of Maryland School of Law Germany The effects of the patent shall not extend to... acts done for experimental purposes which are related to the subject matter of the patented invention.... German Patent Act § 11, No. 2

University of Maryland School of Law United Kingdom An act which... would constitute an infringement of a patent for an invention shall not do so if – (a) it is done privately and for purposes which are not commercial; (b) it is done for experimental purposes relating to the subject-matter of the invention.... Patents Act 1977, Art. 60 § 5

University of Maryland School of Law Japan [T]he effects of the patent right shall not extend to the working of the patent right for the purposes of experiment or research. Japanese Patent Law § 69(1)

University of Maryland School of Law China None of the following shall be deemed an infringement of the patent right:... where any person uses the patent concerned solely for the purpose of scientific research and experiment. Chinese Patent Law ¶ 5, Art. 62

University of Maryland School of Law Future Judicial Appeal Proposed Legislation H.R Alternatives

University of Maryland School of Law H.R It shall not be an act of infringement for any individual or entity to use any patent for or patented use of genetic sequence information for purposes of research [where] the term 'research' means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.

University of Maryland School of Law Exemption from Liability Affirmative defense Entity specific or Conduct specific Causation (ex post, ex ante) Primary Purpose standard Rebuttable presumption Patentee or Researcher burden of proof Covenant not to sue

University of Maryland School of Law Exemption from Remedies Preclusion of injunctive relief Public interest primacy Compulsory license (royalty bearing) Preclusion of money damages Compulsory license (royalty free) Other terms Nonexclusivity, field of use, sublicense/transfer

University of Maryland School of Law

Patent Law Updates