Is Increased Bias Current and CMN Correlated?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 Faulty Channel Sources (TOB) Fault Sources (excluding cable breaks and CMN)  Hybrid-0.004%
Advertisements

US Production Report - September 4, Incandela 1 US Production Report CMS Tracker Steering Committee 4 September 2003 J. Incandela University of.
1 Module produced with low R int sensors-Anthony AffolderSensor Meeting, Feb 11, 2004 Modules Produced With Low R int Sensors Anthony Affolder UCSB.
Slide 1US silicon group meeting 5/6/2003 Hybrid Testing Status 10 new hybrids brought by Lenny all tested à 9 tested with no flaws à 1 had 1 chip + 1 wirebond.
Finding ST Sensors that cause CMN: A Follow up to TSC Meeting N. 215 Prof. J. Incandela UC Santa Barbara US CMS Tracker Project Leader Tracker Steering.
1 CMN Problem Review-Anthony AffolderTPO, December 11, 2003 Review of CMN Problem/Studies Ariella requested me to review the current understanding of the.
Slide 1Electrical Testing at UCSB -Anthony AffolderDOE review, January 20, 2004 Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids, Modules, & Rods Anthony Affolder On.
1 US Testing Status-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, Dec. 11, 2003 Update of US Testing Status Anthony Affolder On behalf of the US testing group.
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 US Module Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group) Update.
Quality Test of L1 sensors HPK 10 sensors –Tested all, 6 sent to Fermilab – Test structures, HPK 133 L00 CDF ELMA 9 sensors –Tested 6 of 9.
Guido_Tonelli / CMS_TSC / 5 February Time stability of ST sensors The problem The sensors re-measuring campaign Failure analysis Conclusions.
Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)
Tracker Week, CERN, Oct Oct 2003Tracker Week - Bonding WGSalvatore Costa - Catania Which strips should the Bonders skip because of known.
APV Lectures APV FE Basic Building Blocks How Our Testing Works
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Update of US Testing Status
US Module Production Status
APV Lectures APV FE Basic Building Blocks How Our Testing Works
Review of CMN Problem/Studies
UCSB Short-term Testing Plan
UCSB Testing 3 Stereo Modules Tested 1 SS6 Module Tested
Results from module testing
Overview Time structure of leakage currents
US Module Production Quality
Recent TOB Developments
Module Failures on RODs
Module Failures on RODs
FNAL Module Testing Status
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
US Testing Mailing List
Discoloration of Passitivation
Module production in Italy
US Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group)
UCSB Short-term Testing Plan
The measurement set-up
Damage under UCSB bias bonds
UCSB Module Assembly Week of 11/28 – 12/2/05 Week of 11/28 – 12/2/2005.
Noise in TOB modules and sensor quality
Hybrid Testing Status 10 new hybrids brought by Lenny all tested
UCSB Qualification Module Grading
Hybrid & Module Electrical Testing
Hybrid Status/Deliveries
Sensor probing (Summary)
First UCSB TEC Module (Pictures)
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
CORRELATION BETWEEN LEAKAGE CURRENT AND NOISE
Passitivation Location
Modules Produced With Low Rint Sensors
Noise in TOB modules and sensor quality
Production Status 39 modules produced
UCSB Module Assembly Week of 12/5 – 12/9/05 Week of 12/5 – 12/9/2005.
Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids, Modules, & Rods
Isolated Bad-CAC Strip at UCSB
Current Necessary for CMN Problem
FNAL module testing summary
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Wirebonding UCSB FNAL Machines
Recent TOB Developments
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Recent TOB Developments
Module Failures on Rods
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Presentation transcript:

Is Increased Bias Current and CMN Correlated? 22 sensors with a >1.5 mA increase in bias current at UCSB Probed both at UCSB/UR Ordered sensors by increase in current Built 8 modules with these sensors Used every other sensor in list starting with the lowest current change Sensor always placed in position furthest from hybrid 1 module built with 2 “bad” sensors 6 of 8 modules have common mode noise Of the two modules without common mode noise: One module had only 1.8 mA of increased current Increased noise seen around known unbonded pinhole The other module now has a current consistent with QTC measurement after construction From these modules, we assume ~11 of the 13 sensors left would cause CMN Could be used in study of cause of CMN

5104 Sensors 20275912 21738507 Channels 442 at 80V Increased bias current seen at 60V in sensor reprobing

5110 Sensors 31215014 14308304 Channels 203 at 70V Increased bias current seen at 30V in sensor reprobing 251 at 130V Increased bias current seen at 130V in sensor reprobing

5124 Sensors 24104717 31830607 Channels 160-162 at 150V Increased bias current seen at 250V in sensor reprobing

5160 Sensors 15061422 21174105 Channels 86-90 at 200V Increased bias current seen at 220V in sensor reprobing

5232 Sensors 14842724 14842701 Channels 505,506 at 350V Increased bias current seen at 400V in sensor reprobing

5294 Sensors 20825319 20833807 Channels 280, 281 at 250V Increased bias current seen at 250V in sensor reprobing

Conclusions 12 of 13 sensors with a current increase of >3000 mA caused common mode noise 2 of 9 modules with a current increase between 2-3 mA caused common mode noise