Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNECE Regulation 13 (braking) Proposed amendment to extend Annex 19 and Annex 20 to cover motor vehicles, especially a vehicle stability function Sheet.
Advertisements

Informal document No.GRB-47-4 (47th GRB, February 2008 Agenda item 3 (a) CLEPA presentations supporting justifications of informal documents GRB-47-2.
ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
Principles of Revision of ECE Regulation No. 59 Submitted by CLEPA Informal document No. GRB-42-8 (42nd GRB, 5-7 September 2005, agenda item.
France consideration on maximum noise in Global Technical Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRB-58 Informal document GRB
GRPE GRPE CGH 2 Experts (A sub-group of the GRPE Informal Group “Hydrogen/Fuel Cell”) JASIC Presentation At The GRPE CGH 2 Experts Meeting.
Proposal for Draft Amendment to Regulation No. 117
Measures for reducing vehicle noise
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
10/05/2010 UNECE-GFV-DF-power1 HDDF power issues – draft proposals to GFV outcome of the GFV meeting Draft amendments to R85.
Motorcycle Noise Emissions - The German Position – - ISO response - 4. GRB Informal Group Meeting 25./26. August 2005 Milwaukee.
Transmitted by the expert from FRANCE Amendments to Regulations Nos. 30, 54 and 117 Informal document GRRF th GRRF, September 2015, agenda.
Starting note on gearshift issues
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
Informal document GRRF-84-32
ASEP, items for clarification
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
The Implement of ECE R51 03series in China
Informal document GRPE-73-21
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Noise Emission of Motor Vehicles
43rd Session GRB 21 February 2006 Geneva, Switzerland
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Indoor pass by noise France Presented by Louis-Ferdinand PARDO
Gas fuelled vehicles in GTR 15: Bringing WLTP in line with Reg. 83:
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Transmitted by the experts from OICA
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
ETRTO response to Working Documents ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2018/8 and
North American All-Season Tyre Pre-meeting
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
Approval of replacement pollution devices within R49
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
ASEP, from 2005 to 2019 Background informations and future works
ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT
Development of Amendment # 2 to UN GTR No. 16 on Tyres
Pilot project: Analysis of the relevance of influencing factors when determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption during type approval of passenger cars.
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
Main subjects: priority 1, 2, 3
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Submitted by the experts of OICA
Status Report to GRB #69 Task Force on Reverse Warning issues
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-12
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
Inflation Pressure Markings
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
OBD CG comments are in: this format & this format
Informal document GRRF-78-41
Editorial proposal on Definitions
CLEPA Input for 3rd IWG ASEP meeting
GRB informal group R51.03 Annex 10
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
India Comments on EPPR
UN R13 and Electro Mechanical Brakes
Presentation transcript:

Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation Informal document GRB-64-15 (64th GRB, 5-7 September 2016, agenda items 16 and 17) Transmitted by the expert from France Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation Prepared by LF Pardo (France)

Background What could be a problem ? What could be a risk ? 1) Dispersion between day-to-day and track-to-track 2) Different interpretation of a text Non compliance during controls. Increase negative relation and competition between manufacturers, technical services, authorities. Loosing trust on noise standards. Loosing trust on industry

1) Dispersion between day-to-day and track-to-track Some answers from regulations : Laboratory alignment Regulation EC (No) 1222/2009, tyre labelling Temperature correction : ECE117 What to do ? As temperature correction is already applied on ECE117, we could start by ECE51. As laboratory alignment already applied on labelling, we could start by ECE117 and extend to ECE51.

2) Different interpretations of a text Clarity and simplification of our regulations (e.g. flowchart) Harmonize selection of representative vehicle , worst case, …

2) Different interpretations of a text Transmission Set Up : If MT, the vehicle is tested on locked-gear If AT, the vehicle could be tested either in locked gear or non-locked gear with the following “Gear ratio selection” condition : “If the vehicle allows different transmission setups like automatic or manual gear selection and/or different software programs or modes (e.g. sporty, winter, adaptive) leading to valid accelerations, the vehicle manufacturer shall prove to the satisfaction of the Technical Service, that the vehicle is tested in the mode which achieves an acceleration being closest to awot ref. (ECE51.03 Annex 3) Question : Is it really clear how to prove which is the better mode to be tested ?

2) Different interpretations of a text Transmission Set Up : The vehicle transmission, gear, or gear ratio may be controlled by electronic or mechanical measures to avoid the activation of a kick-down function.” Therefore, it is permitted to establish and use electronic or mechanical devices, including alternate gear selector positions, to prevent a downshift to a gear ratio which is typically not used for the specified test condition in urban traffic. Question : Is it really clear what is kickdown? What are electronic or mechanical devices? Which effect on vehicle ? Definition of kick-down : A method of changing gear in a car with automatic transmission, by fully depressing the accelerator

Different interpretations of a text Selection of representative vehicle : ECE51.03 Vehicle type for M1/N1 The shape or materials of the engine compartment and its soundproofing; The type of engine (positive or compression ignition, two- or four-stroke, reciprocating or rotary piston), number and capacity of cylinders, number and type of carburettors or injection system, arrangement of valves, or the type of electric motor; Rated maximum net power and corresponding rated engine speed(s); however if the rated maximum net power and the corresponding rated engine speed differs only due to different engine mappings, these vehicles may be regarded as from the same type; The silencing system. Question : Is it really clear how to select representative vehicle ?

2) Different interpretations of a text Selection of representative vehicle : Transmission set-up Transmissions set-up is not part of the Vehicle Type definition  The representative vehicle selected could be either in locked gear, non-locked gear or both Questions : How to select transmission set-up for the representative vehicle?

2) Different interpretations of a text Selection of representative vehicle : Transmission set-up MT Locked gear mode Locked gear MT Locked gear mode AT Locked gear mode Non-locked gear mode Locked gear Non-locked gear MT Locked gear mode AT Non-locked gear mode Locked gear Non-locked gear AT Non-locked gear mode Locked gear Non-locked gear 12/04/2019

2) Different interpretations of a text Selection of representative vehicle : Mass The test mass has to be measured with +/- 5% compared to target mass. Mass is not part of the Vehicle Type definition. In that case, the representative vehicle selected for testing could be for example, a 5 seats or 7 seats. In that case, a urban and L urban could be different. Questions : How is it possible to propose a family based on vehicle mass range ?

2) Different interpretations of a text Continue work done by GRB, ISO to update the text to improve clarity and simplification. Enforce exchange between contracting parties and organization.  Consider it as a specific topic for GRB If it is not possible to be included in regulation directly, propose recommandation document (excel sheet, …)