CUTM 4012: Methods of Teaching English

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PACT Feedback Rubric Pilot Results with UC Davis English Cohort.
Advertisements

Big Ideas, Learning Goals & Success Criteria
Teaching writing.
Quality First Teaching In Any Subject From Good to Outstanding
The Basics of Language Acquisition
Poetry for GCSE Approaches to: Anthology Study, Coursework and Unseen Poems.
The 6 Principles of Second language learning (DEECD,2000) Beliefs and Understandings Assessment Principle Responsibility Principle Immersion Principle.
Benefits from Formal and Informal Assessments
Technology and Motivation
CUTM 4012: Methods of Teaching English Week 6: Writing – Part 1.
ADAPTED FROM: EPSTEIN, J. L., ET AL., (2002). SCHOOL, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS: YOUR HANDBOOK FOR ACTION, SECOND EDITION. Interactive Homework.
Claire Ridsdale, Teaching & Learning Adviser (Literacy
Online Student Success:
Communicative Language Teaching
ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES THE FOUR PART MODEL Presented by Daya Chetty 20 APRIL 2013.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
ROB JENKINS AND STACI JOHNSON SANTA ANA COLLEGE SCHOOL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION (HANDOUTS W/ACTIVITIES SEPARATE)
Marianne RaynaudQualityTime-ESL.com 1 QualityTime-ESL A Presentation by Marianne Raynaud Author of “QualityTime-ESL.com” A “digital” resource book for.
1 Overview of Class #7 Teaching Segment #3: Warm-up problem Introduction to base-ten blocks Analysis of student thinking using samples of students’ written.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
How to Teach English Language Learners Tips and Strategies
 Based on national Response to Intervention  Evolved from 2004 reauthorization of the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)  Instruction.
“Teaching”…Chapter 11 Planning For Instruction
Barbie Simmons 3 rd Grade Science Environment Persuasive Letter to the Principal.
Randi Pellitteri 3 rd grade Informational Writing Science: Georgia.
Learning Through Failure. Reflect O Take a few moments to write down your answers to the following questions: O What was your reaction to the video? O.
Standards That Count: Reading, Discussion, Writing, and Presentation.
Interdisciplinary Writing Unit LeiAnn Thompson READ 7140 Maymester 2007.
DIFFERENT STROKES WAYS TO DIFFERENTIATE IN THE CLASSROOM.
A Sound Investment A Sound Investment 1. Learning Goals Gain an understanding of FL and where it fits Establish a network of colleagues Increased awareness.
How to teach writing Why teach writing?
Big Ideas, Learning Goals & Success Criteria
Teacher Reference (Please use electronic version with class)
Write for 2 minutes about whatever enters your head.
Warm Up - Sponge Activity Work as a team to put the parts of the Madeline Hunter Lesson Plan in the correct sequence. 5 minutes Objective: After reviewing.
Taking the TEAM Approach: Writing with a Purpose
Scaffolding Lessons to Meet Students Needs
Managing Large Classes with Group Work
Learning and Teaching Principles
The SIOP® Model PRACTICE & APPLICATION
Sitton Spelling Refresher
Supporting Students' Native Language in the Classroom
Formative Feedback The single most powerful influence on enhancing achievement is feedback. Hattie, 2009 At best, students receive ‘moments’ of feedback.
The SIOP Model: practice/application
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Instructional Learning Cycle:
Ensuring Success through Assessment – Involve Students
Teacher Reference (Please use electronic version with class)
Observing Behavior: Formal Observational Systems
Tasks & Grades for MET1.
Tasks & Grades for MET2.
Tasks & Grades for MET3.
Tasks & Grades for MET5.
Tasks & Grades for MET4.
Session 1, Program Introduction and Overview
It’s that word again – Differentiation!
Module 8. Creating Meaningful Learning Experiences
Peer and Self Assessment: A Guide
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Lesson 21: Timed writing About this lesson
CUTM 4012: Methods of Teaching English
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Feedback with Impact Time effective strategies to make sure that feedback always leads to learning C Ellison S Fullbrook.
Teacher Reference (Please use electronic version with class)
Higher order questions
Homework Check Everyone should have their homework out. Resource Managers grab answer keys for each member of your team. Team members should share and.
Building Better Classes
CUTM 4012: Methods of Teaching English
Lesson 34: Culminating writing task: writing a first draft
Lesson 36: Culminating writing task: editing and publishing the final draft About this lesson Students edit and publish their final drafts to answer the.
Presentation transcript:

CUTM 4012: Methods of Teaching English Week 7: Writing – Part 2

Coming In Activity Week 7 Video Notes – Grade 4 Student Ratings Add your student ratings for the simile lesson students to the chart on the board. Place a tick ( | ) beside the numbers you assigned. Get together with others entering the class and compare your answers to the other questions on the Week 7 Video Notes handout.

Objectives Upon completion of your studies for Week 7, you should be able to: Describe appropriate feedback and correction techniques for responding to the written work of students. Identify writing objectives within the MOE English Education Syllabus and Teacher Guides. Plan a writing activity that matches an MOE attainment target and also promotes independent thinking skills. Determine evaluation criteria that is appropriate and relevant for judging writing tasks, considering: Language skills: Genre Conventions, Grammar, Spelling, Usage, Punctuation, Linkages Content Awareness of audience Name ways the use of computers can facilitate the instruction of writing. Show an awareness of the benefits of supporting independent thinking within students.

Overview of Today’s Class “Circle of Input and Output” Feedback Diagram Task 1: Correcting student writing Mini-lecture: SARS method of adapting material Task 2: Applying the SARS process Reflection on moving learning into real-world actions

“Circle of Input and Output” (Harmer 2003: 250)

Task 1: Correcting Student Writing (Part 1) As a Peer Pair, talk through the “Feedback Decision Questions” on your HANDOUT. You will have 5 minutes. Answer the questions. See if you both agree.

Class Discussion Questions: What should feedback be based on: Language? Content? Organization? All three? Should all mistakes be corrected? Should learners rewrite, incorporating corrections? Should we let students correct or give feedback on each other’s written work?

Class Discussion Considerations: Correcting work orally in class is a good idea for a large class as it reduces the teacher’s workload. Getting students to correct either their own work or each other’s work takes time in the lesson, but gives students useful practice. Correcting work in class is more successful with fairly controlled writing activities, where there are not too many possible answers.

Task 1: Correcting Student Writing (Part 2) 3. Open your Harmer book to page 111. The chart provides code for 11 common errors. 4. In your class reading, Providing Feedback on ESL Students’ Written Assignments, Williams contends that using a standard set of feedback symbols is advantageous as long as the students know what they mean. 5. Have you had any experience using coded symbols? 6. Use the symbols on page 111 to mark feedback on actual students’ writing samples. Mark your passage and then review it with your peer.

Post-Task Discussion How did you like using the feedback codes? Was it easy to identify the errors? Were there errors that did not fit the code?

Task 2: Applying the SARS Process You may work on your own or in a small group with 1 or 2 other trainees. Choose a grade level. Then, from an MOE Teachers’ Guide, select one of the teaching units and find an objective focused on writing skills. Your goal is to modify a writing activity from MOE materials to become more student-centred and to increase opportunities for students to exhibit independent thinking. Follow the SARS process steps on the HANDOUT. Work for 20-25 minutes to adapt, reject, and supplement various parts of the unit. Document your plan on paper.

Post-Task Discussion How did you modify the writing task / lesson via the SARS process?

End-of-Class Reflection Think back on today’s lesson. Then write down at least ONE possible, real world application for what you learned today. What actions will you take in the future based on what you learned from this lesson?

Wiki Assignment Your team’s Wiki should include: Information on using codes to give students writing feedback Explanation of the SARS process Evaluation criteria for assessing student writing Examples of ways to increase the amount of independent thinking in your students NOTE: The Wiki should reference class activities and also assigned readings.