WEBOMETRIC RANKING AND THE ROLE OF ICT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAIN MESSAGE key reasons enumerated ->please read speaker notes Research. Report. Reposit. Deposit your scholarly research - it’s as easy as 1, 2, 3 id.
Advertisements

How to improve your web visibility and university ranking
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.
Presented by: Eileen Harvey – Senior Human Resources Consultant June 2015 UCL Senior Promotions Academic, Research and Teaching Fellow Staff.
Webometrics ranking of web resources of Russian research institutes Designed by Irina Kosinets.
Slovenian Science in Scopus Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos - CSIC. SCImago Research Group. Faculty of Social Sciences.
From Berlin back to Business OPEN Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service Mimi Seyffert Manager: Digitisation and Digital Services.
Online Presence for SAIPs What’s Online Presence?
How to improve your web visibility and university ranking
The Web of Science database bibliometrics and alternative metrics
Social Media Exploring Social Media to Enhance Interactive Communication and e-Learning for Students in Higher Education Billy Rector Texas Southern University.
5-7 November 2014 DR Workflow Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.
Digital Libraries: Redefining the Library Value Paradigm Peter E Sidorko The University of Hong Kong 3 December 2010.
Login / Upload / Share Deposit your scholarly research - it’s as easy as 1, 2, 3 MAIN MESSAGE key reasons enumerated ->please read speaker notes id / who.
OPENNESS (1/3).  The global effort to set up institutional research repositories is explicitly recognized in this indicator  It takes into account the.
The Web of Science, Bibliometrics and Scholarly Communication 11 December 2013
Wakil Rektor Bidang Sarana dan Bisnis Institut Pertanian Bogor Higher Education Web Performance.
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI World Class University Committed to Scholarly Excellence Prof. Peter M.F. Mbithi, EBS Vice Chancellor.
Webometric Ranking of Institutional Repositories in India By Mr. Samir Kumar Jalal Asst. Librarian Birla Institute of Technology Mesra, Ranchi.
1 Modern University for the Humanities Moscow, Russia The dynamics of network activity of Russian universities in the international ranking Webometrics.
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
Website Training CBPS. Webometric The Ranking Web or Webometrics is the largest academic ranking of Higher Education Institutions. Conducted by Cybermetrics.
The Web of Science, Bibliometrics and Scholarly Communication
Isidro F. Aguillo Cybermetrics Lab. CCHS-CSIC
RUNNING ON ELSEVIER | SciVal – an introduction Marcel Vonder Head of Product Development, SciVal 3d NEICON International Conference Halkidiki, Greece.
Launching the Dean digitally : the Jonathan Jansen Collection in UPSpace eIFL.net in co-operation with the Research Library Consortium Institutional repositories.
A Project of the University Libraries Ball State University Libraries A destination for research, learning, and friends.
Reference Department Kamilya Assylbekova
TOP SCHOLAR Digital Research WKU Mike Binder Dean of Libraries Western Kentucky University Presentation at Council of Academic Deans Retreat,
Role of librarians in improving the research impact and academic profiling of Indian universities J. K. Vijayakumar Ph. D Manager, Collections & Information.
1 QUICK REFERENCE CARDS FOR RESEARCH IMPACT METRICS.
Research Distribution Matters: The Boise State University Strategy Marilyn Moody, Dean, University Library Boise State University
Building an Outstanding Student Research Journal in the IR Stephanie Davis-Kahl, Scholarly Communications Librarian Michael Seeborg, Professor of Economics.
Data Mining for Expertise: Using Scopus to Create Lists of Experts for U.S. Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs Good afternoon, my name.
Where Should I Publish? Journal Ranking Tools
Professional Development Programme: Design and Development of Institutional Repository Using DSpace Nipul G Shihora INFLIBNET Centre Gandhinagar
QuicK Reference Cards for Research Impact Metrics.
Demonstrating Scholarly Impact: Metrics, Tools and Trends
Curtailing the Challenges Faced in Digital Society
It's Easy to Showcase Your Work with Digital Commons and SelectedWorks
Citation Analysis Your article Jill Otto InCites Other?
Presented By, Dr Manoj Kumar Verma Assistant Professor
Altmetrics: Analysis of Library and Information Science (LIS) Research in the Social Media Ifeanyi J. Ezema (Ph.D) Paper Presented at the 1st International.
Beyond the University: The IR and Research Distribution Strategies
Managing ETDs with Associated Complex Digital Objects
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository
How to Improve the Visibility and Impact of Your Research
Advanced Scientometrics Workshop
e-Thesis Submission: What You Need to Know About Going Global
Rhodes Digital Commons: Raising the visibility of your research Research Week. 12th May 2017 Khawulile Radebe: Librarian: Repository & Metadata Debbie.
The Role of the Liaison Librarian in bibliometrics
UC policy states:  "Superior intellectual attainment, as evidenced both in teaching and in research or other creative achievement, is an indispensable.
What Are Institutional Repositories?
Montclair State University Digital Commons: An Institutional Repository Overview.
SciVal to support building a research strategy
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
ENGAGING WITH LIBRARY USERS
Objectives, activities, and results of the database Lituanistika
SSHRC Institutional Grant University
….part of the OSU Libraries' suite of digital library tools…
Webometrics Team, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus
Bibliometric Services at the Masaryk University
Digital Library and Plan for Institutional Repository
Isid.research.ac.ir
Web champions training
Getting Your Faculty Promoted
Digital Library and Plan for Institutional Repository
AUC’s Role In Facilitating Access To Knowledge In The Arab World
E-Resources for Scholarship Drive
Presentation transcript:

WEBOMETRIC RANKING AND THE ROLE OF ICT PRESENTATION AT THE RETREAT FOR THE STAFF OF ELIZADE UNIVERSITY ON FRIDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2018 BY Dr. Christopher Nkiko

Protocols The Vice- Chancellor Registrar Bursar Deans and Directors Eminent Professors Heads of Departments Distinguished Faculty and Staff Ladies and Gentlemen

May I respectfully applaud and congratulate management on the entrenched practice of annual Executive Retreat for staff. It is indeed a global best practice for Corporate Organizations. It is my privilege to be invited to share thoughts on the topic titled “Webometric Ranking and the Role of ICT”. Great retreats do not necessarily translate to great achievements. It is great commitments and decisions that provoke outstanding results.

Introduction Great institutions are reflections of great talents of staff and students. The web represents most important scholarly communication tool It is the open forum for the community engagement and the universal showcase for attracting talent, funding and resources.

Webometric Ranking It is also known as Ranking web of Universities. This is a ranking system of the world’s Universities based on composite indicators that take into account both the volume of web content (number of web pages and files) the visibility and impact of these web publications according to the number of external links (site citations) received. The ranking is published by the Cybermetrics Lab, a research group of the Spanish Research Council (CSIC) located in Madrid Since 2004, the Ranking web (or webometrics Ranking) is published twice a year (data are collected during the first week of January and July for being published at the end of both months).

Webometric Ranking (Cont’d) It is not a ranking of websites but indicators of global performance of a University such as teaching commitment, results, perceived international prestige, links with the community. Web design is totally irrelevant as all the measurements are related to the contents published (quantity and quality) especially those open access documents of academic interest or relevance.

Indicators and Methodology The following are the areas and methodology of ranking: Presence Visibility or Impact Transparency or Openness Excellence or Scholar

Indicators INDICATORS DESCRIPTION SOURCE WEIGHT Presence Size (number of webpages) of the main webdomain of the institution. It includes all the subdomains   sharing the same (central or main) webdomain and all the file types including rich files like pdf documents Google and Scopus 5% Visibility  Number of external networks (subnets) originating backlinks to the institution's webpages. After normalization, the average value between the two sources is selected Ahrefs  Majestic 50% Transparency or Openness  Number of citations from Top authors according to the source   But see Transparent Ranking for additional info Google Scholar  Citations 10 % Excellence or Scholar Number of papers amongst the top 10% most cited in 26 disciplines   Data for the five year period  Scimago 35 %

S/N INDICATORS METHODOLOGY SOURCE WEIGHT   Presence The university should automate all activities both administrative and academic e.g. signing of forms, registrations, admission process and form, reference letters or forms, hostel accommodation, library registration for both regular students and external users, visitor pages, upload of university activities on social media such as Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn etc. Ensuring all staff have personal webpage on the main domain. All departments and units to have a small portal or micro site as a sub domain All activities/pages or forms should carry subdomains Library should be in charge of uploading scholarly contents on the web in all the file types including rich files like pdf documents and any publication for promotion must be uploaded in IR all lecture notes should be uploaded on the university portal University should deploy Learning Management System Software such as Moodle and lecture notes and presentation should be uploaded on this platform Google scholar 5% score 2.  Visibility  Number of external networks (subnets) originating backlinks to the institution's webpages Institutional Repository should be developed to house all institutions’ and staff publications including gray literature. All university websites should be updated from time to time Ahrefs  Majestic 50% score

S/N INDICATORS METHODOLOGY SOURCE WEIGHT   Visibility In order to increase visibility, external networks must reference resources on domain of interest. E.g Google and all other website must link back to contents on our website. Researchers should be mandated to upload their papers on the University Repository from where all external websites would reference it. Ahrefs Majestic 50% score

3.  Transparency or Openness The university should encourage academics to publish in more reputable outlets and also sponsor their research publications. Collaboration with researchers in other institution both local and international should be encouraged. The more publications linked to the University via institutional email and affiliation, the better. Google Scholar  Citations 10% score

S/N INDICATORS METHODOLOGY SOURCE WEIGHT   Excellence or Scholar This is based on the number of citations from top authors. There should be incentive for those who publish in high-impact journals Scholars need to be taught how to use social media to project their works. Scopus-indexed papers to be rewarded during promotion International linkages and affiliation should be encouraged Sabbatical leave should be tied to terms and condition (publications) Involvement of PG students in University Research Build a vibrant alumni network that will project the image of the institution Build a strong system of conference support grants, competitive training and research grants, rigorous promotion criteria Google scholar 35% score

Conclusion It is about building appropriate digital platforms and infrastructure. It is about generating contents in quantity and quality as well as uploading them as appropriate. It is about generating appropriate traffics and backlinks. It is embracing internal efficiency and excellence to grow institutional reputation.

References http://www.webometrics.info/en/current_edition http://www.webometrics.info/en/node/169

Thank you