Marvell Semiconductor

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0116r1 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Jan Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation.
Doc.: IEEE /0335r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 Instantaneous SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1391r0 Submission Nov Yakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 About SINR conversion for PHY Abstraction Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r0 Submission Nov Yan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Methodology of Calibrating System Simulation Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0116r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. Al.Slide 1 Long-Term SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0612r0 May 2014 Jiyong Pang, et. al. HuaweiSlide 1 Calibration Procedures towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0372r2 Slide 1 System Level Simulations on Increased Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Jinjing Jiang(Marvell) March.
Doc.: IEEE /0383r0 Submission Considerations on evaluation methodology for candidate HEW PHY&MAC techniques Date: March 2014 Le Liu, et.
Doc.: IEEE /0307r0 Submission January 2014 Nihar Jindal, Broadcom PHY Calibration Results Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
OFDMA performance in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment
Simulation results for
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
SLS Box5 Calibration Results and Discussions
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
Outdoor Channel Model Simulation Follow-up
OFDMA Performance Analysis
RBIR-based PHY Abstraction with Channel Estimation Error
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Further Study of Time Varying Interference and PHY Abstraction
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Further Discussions on PHY Abstraction
Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” Document
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Simulation results for
Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2
OBSS Preamble Detection
Simulation Results for Box5
Overview on RBIR-based PHY Abstraction
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
Performance Gains from CCA Optimization
TX Mask Shoulders vis-à-vis ACI
Box 5 Calibration Result
Consideration on PER Prediction for PHY Abstraction
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Simulation results for
Text Update on PHY Abstraction and SP
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
PHY Abstractions Types For HEW System Level Simulations
Simulation results for
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
DSC Calibration Result
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Presentation transcript:

Marvell Semiconductor Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2014 Further Discussions on Instantaneous SINR Calibration for System Simulation Date: 2014-05-11 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Yakun Sun Marvell Semiconductor 5488 Marvell Ln, Santa Clara, CA 95054 1-408-222-3847 yakunsun@marvell.com Jinjing Jiang Yan Zhang Hongyuan Zhang Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell) John Doe, Some Company

May 2014 Overview The discussions on instantaneous SINR calibration for SLS have been kicked off [1,2] Several different options on how this should be done We have some further results and discussions on this topic Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Recap on Our Previous Results [1] May 2014 Recap on Our Previous Results [1] Method of SINR collection: Minimal MAC: CSMA (EDCA with default parameters) Fixed MCS for all nodes, fixed packet size. Collect SINR at the equalizer output for the desired packet. Calibration metric as the distribution of Option 1: SINR per tone Option 2: Effective SNR per packet By-product: To simplify the SLS complexity, approximate some interfering channels, whose signal is below a threshold, to be AWGN Use the distribution of instantaneous SINR to determine the threshold With maximum interfering channels simplified and with the minimal impact on SINR introduced The step2 calibration is the perfect time to study and agree on such a threshold. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Further Discussions (1) – Simple MAC May 2014 Further Discussions (1) – Simple MAC MAC = channel access rule for this step  simple MAC Why channel access rule for SINR calibration? Instantaneous SINR naturally implies some channel access. Avoid additional work to bypass channel access. Typically fading channel generation is deeply embedded in the simulator. Instantaneous SINR collection with no channel access (as done for long term SINR) requires additional work. A minimalist MAC is preferable for instantaneous SINR calibration Option 1: CSMA Option 2: CCA-only Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Simple MAC: CCA-only Model May 2014 Simple MAC: CCA-only Model A slotted transmission is assumed Each transmitting node will transmit simultaneously and over a fixed/identical duration. In each slot, some nodes are active (try to access the channel) depending on UL/DL traffic ratio. Who to transmit? CCA-based channel access rule All active nodes are independently ordered for each slot, nodes up front has a high probability of transmission. Each node checks for CCA to determine if it can access the channel. Interference only counts already determined transmitters at the moment of CCA. One node per BSS can transmit. After the transmitting nodes are selected for a given slot, compute the instantaneous SINR at each receiver. Determine the desire receiver for each transmitting node: AP (if node is STA) or a random STA associated with node (if node is AP). Interference comes from all undesired transmitting nodes through fading channels. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

An Example of CCA-only Channel Access May 2014 An Example of CCA-only Channel Access Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Comparison on Simple MAC Models May 2014 Comparison on Simple MAC Models Pros Cons CSMA Captures the close-to-reality SINR Enables the study of interfering channel approximation More effort is needed to implement. CCA-only Very easy to implement The results are only accurate with respect to the channel calibration. Hardly useable for future system performance evaluation due to inaccuracy Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Further Discussions (2): SINR Metric May 2014 Further Discussions (2): SINR Metric Option 1: SINR per tone Option 2: Effective SNR per packet SINR per tone is preferred because: SINR per tone is simpler  available before effective SNR mapping and no additional processing Effective SNR is a highly compressed value for the fading channel, hiding the mismatch of channel implementation The reason of calibrating via effective SNR is to guarantee the system performance afterward (the same effective SNR, the same PER/Throughput). No consensus on effective SNR yet. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Procedure of Statistics Collection May 2014 Procedure of Statistics Collection Detailed PHY is assumed Fading channel models, Doppler spectrum, and antenna correlation (if MIMO) defined by scenarios Receiver algorithm is reflected (MMSE for MIMO, or MRC for single stream) PER decision is not required (irrelevant) at this step Simple MAC is assumed CCA-only CSMA Full buffer traffic (active nodes always try to access channel) Each AP and STA transmits a packet of a fixed (and equal) size at a fixed MCS. Only collect the desired data frame. Multiple drops of AP/STAs are simulated for a scenario In each drop, collect the equalizer-output SINR Generate the distribution (CDF) of dynamic physical layer receiver output SINR Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Simulation Setup Simulation is based on scenarios in [3]. May 2014 Simulation Setup Simulation is based on scenarios in [3]. Distribution of uplink instantaneous SINR are plotted as an example. We can select only one scenario for calibration. Detailed/optional simulation assumptions: 2.4GHz Channel with 20MHz Bandwidth No antenna gain, no cable loss 1 Tx and 1 Rx are assumed (other than defined in [3]) STAs and APs are dropped and associated based on scenario [3] CSMA: EDCA with AC2 for all STAs/APs (using default parameters) MCS 7, each packet of 1584 bytes CCA-only: 1 slot = 1 ms CCA_level = -82dBm Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Simulation Assumptions (Scenario 1) May 2014 Simulation Assumptions (Scenario 1) Parameter Value Number of STAs 4 STAs per apartment Channel Model TGn B (AP-AP, STA-STA, AP-STA) Penetration Loss Wall 12dB, Floor 17dB, linear for multiple walls/floors BW 20MHz at 2.4GHz. Each BSS randomly selects one channel out of 3. TX Power AP: 23dBm, STA: 17dBm Association 100% STA in an apartment associated with the AP in the room. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Instantaneous UL SINR Per Tone May 2014 Instantaneous UL SINR Per Tone SINR by CCA-only has a different distribution than that of CSMA, due to the synchronous vs. asynchronous transmissions. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Simulation Assumptions (Scenario 2) May 2014 Simulation Assumptions (Scenario 2) Parameter Value Number of STAs 4 STAs per cubicle, 4 AP per BSS Channel Model TGn D (AP-AP, STA-STA, AP-STA) Penetration Loss Wall 7dB, linear for multiple walls BW 20MHz at 2.4GHz. Each AP selects one channel out of 4 in a BSS. (BSS4k+1,BSS4k+2,BSS4k+3,BSS4k+4)= (ch1,ch2,ch3,ch4) TX Power AP: 24dBm, STA: 21dBm Association 100% STA in a BSS associated with an AP in the BSS by RSSI, no P2P STA Based on [2] before the document was updated at the meeting. Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Instantaneous UL SINR Per Tone May 2014 Instantaneous UL SINR Per Tone Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Simulation Assumptions (Scenario 3) May 2014 Simulation Assumptions (Scenario 3) Parameter Value Environment BSSs in Hexagon (figure 5), simulated BSS in 1 channel (figure 6) BSS radius: R=7m Number of STAs 30 STAs per BSS Channel Model TGn D (AP-AP, AP-STA), TGn B (STA-STA) Penetration Loss None BW 20MHz at 2.4GHz. Each simulated BSS selects the same channel. TX Power AP: 17dBm, STA: 15dBm Association 100% STA associated with the strongest AP Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Instantaneous UL SINR Per Tone May 2014 Instantaneous UL SINR Per Tone Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Simulation Assumptions (Scenario 4) May 2014 Simulation Assumptions (Scenario 4) Parameter Value Environment BSSs in Hexagon (figure 8), ICD = 130m Number of STAs 10 STAs per BSS (100% outdoor) Channel Model UMi (AP-AP, AP-STA, STA-STA) Penetration Loss None BW 20MHz at 2.4GHz. Each simulated BSS selects the same channel. TX Power AP: 30dBm, STA: 15dBm Association 100% STA associated with the strongest AP Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Instantaneous UL SINR Per Tone May 2014 Instantaneous UL SINR Per Tone Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

Summary Two options of instantaneous SINRs calibration are proposed. May 2014 Summary Two options of instantaneous SINRs calibration are proposed. Suggestion1: Use SINR per tone given its convenience and readiness. Suggestion2: Use simple MAC for channel access Open to discussion on CSMA or CCA-only Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)

May 2014 References [1] 11-14-0335-00-0Instantaneous-SINR-Calibration-For-System-Simulation [2] 11-14-0307-00-0PHY-Calibration-Results [3] 11-13-1001-06-0hew-HEW-evaluation-simulation-scenarios-document-template Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)