Using EBVs from NSIP Rusty Burgett, NSIP Program Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Where next for Terminal Sire Recording? Samuel Boon, Signet Manager and EBLEX Breeding Specialist.
Advertisements

Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
Seminar July 2012 – Waldo Pigs
Mongastric Production Swine Section Breeding and Selection of Swine.
“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University.
Sheep Production Operations Animal Science Ms. Selman.
Introduction to LAMBPLAN for the USA Texel Society.
Ken Andries, Ph.D. Kentucky State University College of Agriculture, Food Science, and Sustainable Systems.
Lecture 3-22 Exam 3 Breeds FineMediumCoarse Most important breeds? Why so many in US?
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
We can calculate Dressing Percentage. Carcass Wt. / Live Wt. X 100 = Dressing Percentage.
Dr. John W. Mabry Iowa Pork Industry Center Iowa State University
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
TM Goats in Kentucky Ken Andries, Ph.D. CAFSSS Kentucky State University.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Selection for Lifetime Production
EBLEX Better Returns Programme Material produced for EBLEX Beef BRP by Signet Breeding Services Genetic Improvement of Beef Cattle in the UK.
BREEDING SUPERIOR SHEEP describe and explain how sheep breeders can achieve genetic progress in their flocks.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
Chapters 13 & 14. Objectives Understanding of the concept of genetic variation Knowledge of quantitative vs. qualitative traits Appreciation for genetic.
Wade Shafer American Simmental Association. In the pursuit of genetic improvement all traits are antagonistically related to each other.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Beef Cattle Production
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
Nuts and Bolts of Genetic Improvement Genetic Model Predicting Genetic Levels Increase Commercial Profitability Lauren Hyde Jackie Atkins Wade Shafer Fall.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Selecting Herd Bull Beef Production Game. What is the job of our bull? Produce sperm Pass on quality genetics of rate of gain, muscling, structure Physically.
What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference
Advanced Animal Breeding
Improving Carcass Merit while maintaing profit. Industry Challenge Muscle weight as a % of LW LW Muscle as % of LW Cattle Deer22039 Pig20032 Sheep8128.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Growth and Carcase ASBVs Work. Sheep CRC - Information Nucleus Flock Background Sheep CRC initiated large scale progeny test of young industry sires -
Gene350 Animal Genetics Lecture September 2009.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
David L. Thomas Department of Animal Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison Basics of Sheep Breeding for Commercial Flocks.
Selection by Stud and Commercial Breeders Dohne Workshop Australia July 2016 Cameron McMaster Breeders can influence the economic performance, the genetic.
Selecting Swine Plant & Animal Science. Bell Work The Incredible Pig Did you Know? The pig was among the first animals domesticated Introduced to North.
Selecting Swine From foukeffa.org Written by Ivy DeSimone
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Beef Cattle Production
Selecting Swine   Ag 102.
Key Factors in Profitable Sheep Production
Profitable Sheep Production in the Biofuels Era
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Using EPDs in Selection
From Conception to Carcass
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Data collection made easy!
Project Approach and Outreach
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Using EPDs in Selection
Evaluation of terminal sire breeds for hair sheep production systems on lamb birth, weaning and grazing performance: Year 3 A.R. Weaver1, D.L. Wright1,
Definition of EBVs of Economically Relevant Traits in Sheep Production
History of Selection From Phenotypes to Economic Indexes
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Unit 4: Genetic Selection & Mating
Presentation transcript:

Using EBVs from NSIP Rusty Burgett, NSIP Program Director

Importance of Genetic Selection Need to produce more lamb and wool from a smaller national flock Productivity Improvement Wider adoption of Quantitative Genetic Selection U.S. Sheep Industry Roadmap Genetics are the foundation to build upon

Value of a Ram Profit is determined by pounds of lamb(wool) sold per ewe. Number of lambs born Number of lambs weaned Birth, weaning and post weaning weight of lambs Wool yield and quality

Which Ram?

Estimated Breeding Values EBVs are tools that: Minimize guesswork of ram selection Assign number values to genetic merit Allows for quick, easy comparison More powerful than actual performance data, adjusted means... Focused on economically important traits

Interpreting EBVs

New Tool for Ram Selection NSIP Ram Buying Guide 3-step tool to select rams for productivity Fine-tuned for each flock Commercial Purebred

www.NSIP.org

Analyze Production Quantify current production level: NLB 1.2 NLW 0.8 Number of lambs born/ewe Number of lambs weaned/ewe Average weaning weight of lambs Average post weaning growth (ADG) Example: Polypay flock, producing own replacements NLB 1.2 NLW 0.8 WWT 62 GFW 6.5

Set Goals Establish a goal for improvement of each trait Prioritize importance of each goal for profit Trait Current Goal Priority NLB 1.2 2.0 2 NLW 0.8 1 WWT 62 68 3 GFW 6.5 8.5 4

Use EBVs in Selection Start with Production Indexes Combine multiple traits into one value Maternal-USA Maternal Terminal-Carcass Plus Range-USA Range Hair-USA Hair Select from top 60% of the index

Step 3. Use EBVs in Selection Select for individual traits Based on priority of goals Priority 1.-select ram in top 10% of breed for that trait Priority 2.-select ram in top 20% of breed Priority 3.-select ram in top 25% of breed

Step 3. Use EBVs in Selection Trait Current Goal Priority Percentile NLB 1.2 2.0 2 Top 20% NLW 0.8 1 Top 10% WWT 62 68 3 Top 25%

http://nsip.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/62-Percentiles.pdf

Top 10% have 24.3 or higher

Step 3. Use EBVs in Selection Trait Current Goal Priority Percentile NLB 1.2 2.0 2 Top 20% NLW 0.8 1 Top 10% WWT 62 68 3 Top 25%

http://nsip.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/62-Percentiles.pdf

Step 3. Use EBVs in Selection Trait Current Goal Priority Percentile NLB 1.2 2.0 2 Top 20% NLW 0.8 1 Top 10% WWT 62 68 3 Top 25%

http://nsip.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/62-Percentiles.pdf

Use EBVs in Selection Prioritizing selection pressure on individual traits will expedite genetic progress Priority should be placed on economically important traits

“Common Sense Traits” Visual appraisal of ram for: Sound feet and legs, free of foot rot Correct mouth structure Breeding soundness exam Health status and susceptibility Scrapie OPP Spider

Not a Silver Bullet Does not replace good management Breeding Program Including cross breeding! Nutrition Marketing

Thank you! Questions? Website: www.nsip.org Paid for in part by the American Sheep Industry Website: www.nsip.org email: info@nsip.org phone:515-708-8850 Facebook

Does it Work?

Genetic Progress 14 extra lambs/100 ewes lambing! 1.75 pounds heavier @ 60 days=201 more lbs of lamb!

Genetic Progress

Conclusion This method is designed to: Reduce risks associated with ram selection Expedite genetic progress Increase productivity Visit www.nsip.org for more information including percentile and elite sire reports

Where we’ve been, where we are, & where we are going! CULHAM & STEVENS NSIP

Where we’ve been… Culham & Stevens Webberville, MI

1987 CROSSROADS Spider Gene Tax laws change

Previous mistakes Abandoned performance for “Pretty” Made excuses for sheep “Worked for sheep, rather than sheep working for me” Selected for the wrong things

Where to boss? Rebuilt flock with bloodlines free from “spider” gene New labor agreement

HOW ?

1989 enrolled in NSIP

Data Shock!

EPD = Expected Progeny Difference “The Bell Curve” 1995 Suffolk Sire Summary 25 . N o 20 . o 15 f S 10 i r e 5 s -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 120 day wt. EPD (lbs.) EPD = Expected Progeny Difference EBV = Expected Breeding Value = EPD x 2

“EPDs” Express expected performance of offspring compared to breed average EPDs are expressed as a deviation from the breed average FEPDs are expressed as a deviation from the flock average Expressed in same unit as measured

1473

IN THE DARK when selecting outside sires without EPDs Rams purchased could not be compared to ours Few breeders on NSIP New sires were near “0” for most traits

S-p-i-n-n-i-n-g our wheels Genetic trend Selection only on dam side by culling & replacement ewe selection No progress!

Leap of faith Use the data!

Faith rewarded Started EPD Sire selection

Genetic trend changes Red - before EPD sire selection Blue - after EPD sire selection

1996 across flock Enough genetic links between flocks to compare individuals in different ones Provides ability to directly compare animals raised in different flocks

“P-80” “P-80” 1996 - more challenges 6 of 7 sires of our 1996 lambcrop tested “QQ” at Codon 171 Transferred embryos from our top “QR” ewe bred to “RR” ram with no EPDs Produced stud ram to use in 1997 Culham & Stevens ET “P-80” Culham & Stevens ET “P-80” PWW EPD +3.5 “RR” at Codon 171

Had to add “R” gene

Moving the population

Then NOW

Breed the best to the best to achieve the best results

STACKING pedigrees +2.9 +5.9 +2.2 -1.4 -1.6 +4.5 -1.0 +3.2 +6.2 +5.6 +10.1 +2.7 +3.5 +5.3 +8.8 +3.1 +2.0 +5.8 +2.8 -0.5 +2.2

Decrease generation interval Breed ewe lambs Use young stud rams

1999 RAM LAMB from 1998 born sire & 1998 born dam

Where we are going… We have a direction in mind!

PREDICTABLE PERFORMANCE 1.8 (Sire EPD + Dam EPD)/2 = Offspring EPD Sire selection is critical What would the offspring be if you selected ram with no breeding value?

Culham & Stevens 5BR155 2005

Sired World’s Fastest Growing Sheep in 2008 for Michigan State University Breed trait leading sire for Weaning weight and post weaning weight 2008

Culham & Stevens 5BR155 sired Top selling ram 2010 Center of the Nation Sale “Sparty” MSU 9170 June 2015 Suffolk trait leading proven sire for Carcass Plus Index

Culham & Stevens 5BR155 can be found in the pedigree of: The top 12 elite proven suffolk sires for Carcass Plus Index. All 32 elite young suffolk sires listed for Carcass Plus Index. The top 21 proven sires for post weaning weight Top 26 proven sires for weaning weight

Post weaning growth trend

Selecting by visual appraisal = no change

1st across flock EPD run

NSIP Postweaning WT EPD Distributions for Suffolk Sires “The Bell Curve”

Using unselected rams Opportunity Lost!

Using AVG Suffolk NSIP Sires 3.62 LBS Opportunity Lost!

Using AVG Suffolk NSIP Sires $21,000.

Using AVG Suffolk NSIP Sires $259,710

Using highly selected NSIP sires

Using highly selected NSIP sires 9.50 LBS

Using highly selected NSIP sires $50,000.

Using highly selected NSIP sires $418,550

Premium over unselected sires $678,260

NSIP allows us to: & where we are going! where we are, THE END know where we have been, where we are, & where we are going! THE END

Alan Culham alan@sheepusa.org 517/896-7378 Questions? Alan Culham alan@sheepusa.org 517/896-7378

Step 3. Use EBVs in Selection Trait Current Goal Priority Percentile NLB 1.2 2.0 2 Top 20% NLW 0.8 1 Top 10% WWT 62 68 3 Top 25%

http://nsip.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/62-Percentiles.pdf