Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of the Staphylococcus aureus DgkB Structure Reveals a Common Catalytic Mechanism for the Soluble Diacylglycerol Kinases  Darcie J. Miller, Agoston.
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
ATP-Bound States of GroEL Captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy
Nir Kalisman, Gunnar F. Schröder, Michael Levitt  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 Complex Assembled on DNA and Its Implications for DNA DSB Repair  Laura Spagnolo, Angel Rivera-Calzada,
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Conformational Changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Lionel Costenaro, J. Günter Grossmann, Christine Ebel, Anthony Maxwell 
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Structural Insights into RNA-Dependent Ring Closure and ATPase Activation by the Rho Termination Factor  Emmanuel Skordalakes, James M. Berger  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Kei-ichi Okazaki, Shoji Takada  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Solution Structures of Engineered Vault Particles
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Volume 131, Issue 7, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Structure of the AAA ATPase p97
Anna Hagmann, Moritz Hunkeler, Edward Stuttfeld, Timm Maier  Structure 
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e2 (September 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Structure and Mechanism of Imidazoleglycerol-Phosphate Dehydratase
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Gymnastics of Molecular Chaperones
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Visualizing the ATPase Cycle in a Protein Disaggregating Machine: Structural Basis for Substrate Binding by ClpB  Sukyeong Lee, Jae-Mun Choi, Francis.
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Clemens C. Heikaus, Jayvardhan Pandit, Rachel E. Klevit  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Topologies of a Substrate Protein Bound to the Chaperonin GroEL
The AXH Domain Adopts Alternative Folds
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Structure of the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 633-639 (May 2011) Cryo-EM Structure of a Group II Chaperonin in the Prehydrolysis ATP-Bound State Leading to Lid Closure  Junjie Zhang, Boxue Ma, Frank DiMaio, Nicholai R. Douglas, Lukasz A. Joachimiak, David Baker, Judith Frydman, Michael Levitt, Wah Chiu  Structure  Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 633-639 (May 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2011.03.005 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Micrograph and Class-Averages of D386A Δlid with ATP in the Open State Class-averages are calculated using EMAN program “refine2d.py” by clustering two-dimensional images of single particles by their similarity and then averaging the images in a particular cluster corresponding to the desired view. See also Figure S1. Structure 2011 19, 633-639DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.03.005) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Map and Model of D386A Δlid with ATP at 8 Å Resolution (A) Top view and side view of the density map. (B) Model built using Rosetta. (C) Slice view of the equatorial domains showing α helices. (D) Model of Mm-cpn subunit in its density with helices L, C and stem-loop labeled. Blue arrow indicates the ATP-binding pocket. (E) ATP binding pocket of Mm-cpn with the nucleotide density indicated by a blue dotted circle as viewed along the blue arrow in (D). See also Figure S2. Structure 2011 19, 633-639DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.03.005) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison between the ATP-Free (cyan) and ATP-Bound (purple) State Δlid Mm-cpn (A) Apical domains viewed from the top. The dotted blue and red circles touch the innermost part of the apical domains of ATP-free and ATP-bound states, respectively. The blue and red dotted lines show the orientation of the truncated helices in the apical domains. (B) Intermediate and apical domains tilt around the hinge point marked by a black solid triangle. The black star labels the ATP-binding pocket. Inset shows the superposition of the interface (formed by the stem-loop of one subunit and the N, C termini of the other) between adjacent subunits within one ring. See also Figure S3 and Movies S1, S2, and S4. Structure 2011 19, 633-639DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.03.005) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison between the ATP-Bound State (purple) and ATP-Hydrolysis (yellow) State Δlid Mm-cpn (A) Apical domains viewed from the top. The dotted red and brown circles touch the innermost part of the apical domains of ATP-bound and ATP-hydrolysis states, respectively. The red and brown dotted lines show the orientation of the truncated helices in the apical domains. (B) Subunit rotation is around the hinge point labeled by a black solid triangle. The black star labels the ATP-binding pocket. Inset shows the superposition of the interface (formed by the stem-loop of one subunit and the N, C termini of the other) between adjacent subunits within one ring. See also Figure S3 and Movies S1, S2, and S4. Structure 2011 19, 633-639DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.03.005) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Relative Conformational Change within the Chaperonin's Subunit during ATP Binding and ATP Hydrolysis (A) Overlap of the single-subunit ATP-free (cyan) and ATP-bound (purple) models. (B) Overlap of the single-subunit ATP-bound (purple) and ATP-hydrolysis (yellow) models. The single subunits from each of the three conformations are aligned. The black stars label the ATP-binding pockets. See also Figure S4 and Movie S3. Structure 2011 19, 633-639DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.03.005) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Conformational Change around ATP Binding Pocket upon ATP Binding and ATP Hydrolysis (A) Overlap of ATP-free (transparent cyan) and ATP-bound (purple) models with ATP (sphere model) docked in the ATP-bound state Mm-cpn model. (B) Overlap of ATP-bound (transparent purple) and ATP-hydrolysis (yellow) models with ATP (sphere model) docked in the ATP-hydrolysis state Mm-cpn model. Helices F, G, L and stem-loop are labeled. Sidechians of residue 386 and 60, which are critical for ATP hydrolysis are in stick models. The point of view is indicated by the eye cartoon in Figure 5. See also Movie S3. Structure 2011 19, 633-639DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.03.005) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions