Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Single Cell-Based Vector Tracing in Patients with ADA-SCID Treated with Stem Cell Gene Therapy  Yuka Igarashi, Toru Uchiyama, Tomoko Minegishi, Sirirat.
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 1996)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
RAG Proteins Shepherd Double-Strand Breaks to a Specific Pathway, Suppressing Error-Prone Repair, but RAG Nicking Initiates Homologous Recombination 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Transient Gene Expression by Nonintegrating Lentiviral Vectors
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
CD22 is a negative regulator of B-cell receptor signalling
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Slicing-Independent RISC Activation Requires the Argonaute PAZ Domain
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
Yang Xu, Genhong Cheng, David Baltimore  Immunity 
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
A T Cell–Specific Enhancer in the Interleukin-3 Locus Is Activated Cooperatively by Oct and NFAT Elements within a DNase I–Hypersensitive Site  Kym N.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 1996)
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
Both E12 and E47 Allow Commitment to the B Cell Lineage
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
The DNA Damage Machinery and Homologous Recombination Pathway Act Consecutively to Protect Human Telomeres  Ramiro E. Verdun, Jan Karlseder  Cell  Volume.
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
IgH Class Switch Recombination to IgG1 in DNA-PKcs-Deficient B Cells
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Control of Sister Chromatid Recombination by Histone H2AX
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Rodney P. DeKoter, Hyun-Jun Lee, Harinder Singh  Immunity 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
POLD3 Is Haploinsufficient for DNA Replication in Mice
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Regulation of TCRβ Gene Assembly by a Promoter/Enhancer Holocomplex
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Control of B Cell Production by the Adaptor Protein Lnk
Presentation transcript:

Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 631-640 (September 2008) Lymphocyte-Specific Compensation for XLF/Cernunnos End-Joining Functions in V(D)J Recombination  Gang Li, Frederick W. Alt, Hwei-Ling Cheng, James W. Brush, Peter H. Goff, Mike M. Murphy, Sonia Franco, Yu Zhang, Shan Zha  Molecular Cell  Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 631-640 (September 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.017 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Characterization of XLFΔ/Δ ES Cells (A) Western blotting assay for XLF in WT, XLFΔ/Δ, and XLFΔ/Δ ES cells that overexpress truncated XLF. The number in the brackets indicates the cDNA construct copy number in each line. “XLF” denotes the mobility of authentic XLF; “ΔXLF” denotes the mobility of XLFΔα4/5. NS1, NS2, and NS3 indicate mobility of commonly observed nonspecific bands observed in WT and XLFΔ/Δ extracts. The asterisk (∗) and double asterisk (∗∗)denote XLFΔα4/5 bands from four and six copy transfectants, respectively. (B) IR sensitivity of WT, XLFΔ/Δ ES, and XLFΔ/Δ ES overexpressing XLFΔα4/5 cells from a pGK-promoter-based expression vector. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent experiments. (C) Summary of transient V(D)J recombination results on WT, XLFΔ/Δ, and XLFΔ/Δ ES cells that overexpressed XLFΔα4/5. Values reflect two independent experiments from two independent XLFΔα4/5overexpressing ES lines (six and four copies; see Table S1 for details). Molecular Cell 2008 31, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.017) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Characterization of XLFΔ/Δ MEFs (A) Proliferation of two independent sets (set [a] from a 129/Sv background and set [b] from a 129/BL6 mixed background) of primary WT and XLFΔ/Δ MEFs. Error bars represent the standard deviation of a triplicate cell count at each time point or dose. (B) IR sensitivity of the two independent sets of WT and XLFΔ/Δ MEFs. Error bars represent the standard deviation of a triplicate cell count at each time point or dose. (C) T-FISH analyses of spontaneous cytogenetic abnormalities in passage one WT and XLFΔ/Δ MEF lines (n = 3 for each genotype). Chromosome and chromatid breaks were scored as described (Franco et al., 2008). Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent experiments using independently derived WT and XLFΔ/Δ MEF lines. (D) Transient V(D)J recombination results from immortalized WT and XLFΔ/Δ MEFs. Values were obtained from multiple independent experiments from two independent XLFΔ/Δ MEF lines (see Figure S3 and Table S2 for details). Molecular Cell 2008 31, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.017) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Lymphocyte Development in XLFΔ/Δ Mice (A) Western blotting analysis of XLF cross-reactive protein expression in extracts from indicated lymphoid organs of littermate-matched WT and XLFΔ/Δ mice (see Figure S1 for more examples). Symbols are as described in Figure 1 legend. (B) Representative FACS analyses of lymphocyte development in 4-week-old WT, XLFΔ/Δ, and RAG2−/− mice. (C) Percentage and number of developing and mature lymphocytes in bone marrow (BM), thymus, and spleen from WT and XLFΔ/Δ mice. Cell numbers in different fractions indicated in (C) were calculated by determining total cell numbers in each organ and then determining the percentage in each fraction (indicated by boxes on FACS plots in [B]). Molecular Cell 2008 31, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.017) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Characterization of XLFΔ/Δ A-MuLV Transformed Pro-B Cells (A) Western blotting for XLF expression in WT and XLFΔ/Δ A-MuLV transformed pro-B cells and XLFΔ/Δ A-MuLV transformant that overexpresses WT XLF from an integrated SV40-promoter-based vector containing a puromycin-resistant gene (denoted as XLFΔ/Δ +XLF) (see Figure S1 for more examples). (B) IR sensitivity of WT, XLFΔ/Δ, and XLFΔ/Δ +XLF A-MuLV-transformed pro-B cells. Error bars represent the standard deviation of a triplicate cell count at each dose. (C) Repair of IR-induced DNA DSBs by WT, XLFΔ/Δ, and XLFΔ/Δ +XLF A-MuLV-transformed pro-B cells. The mean and standard deviation of three experiments are plotted. (D) Summary of the transient V(D)J recombination assays on WT, XLFΔ/Δ, and XLFΔ/Δ +XLF A-MuLV-transformed pro-B cells (see Figure S7 and Table S3 for details). Molecular Cell 2008 31, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.017) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Chromosomal V(D)J Recombination in WT and XLFΔ/Δ A-MuLV Transformants (A) The pMX-INV V(D)J recombination substrate (adapted from Bredemeyer et al., 2006). The pMX-INV vector has a single pair of recombination RSs that flank an inverted green fluorescent protein (GFP) cassette. Normal V(D)J recombination allows for GFP expression. Also shown is a schematic representation of nonrearranged (NR), cleavage intermediates (CE and SE) and joining products (CJ and SJ) of pMX-INV. The long terminal repeats (LTR), packaging sequence, GFP cDNA, IRES-hCD4 cDNA (I-hCD4), 5′ 12-recombination signal (12-RS) and 3′ 23-RS (filled and open triangles, respectively), EcoRV (V) site, NcoI (N) site, and C4 probe are indicated. (B) Clones of WT, XRCC4−/−, and three independent XLFΔ/Δ (a, b, and c) pro-B cell lines were treated with STI571 for 0, 48, and 96 hr, and rearrangement was assayed for GFP expression. (C) Southern blot analyses of the rearrangement status of an inversional V(D)J recombination substrate (on right). For the upper gel, DNA was digested with EcoRV and NcoI and probed with the indicated C4 probe. The NR (nonrearranged) and 3′CE are both 2.2 kb and the rearranged product is 4 kb. For the lower gel, DNA was digested with EcoRV and probed with the same C4 probe. The NR and CJ are 5 kb bands and the 3′CE is a 2.2 kb band. Molecular Cell 2008 31, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.017) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Class Switch Recombination in XLFΔ/Δ Mice (A) Proliferation of purified splenic B cells from WT and XLFΔ/Δ mice following αCD40/IL-4 stimulation. Error bars represent the standard deviation of a triplicate cell count at each time point from one representative experiment. (B) Representative FACS analysis of CD43− splenocytes from WT, AID−/−, and XLFΔ/Δ mice after 4 days of indicated stimulations. (C) Percentage of IgH locus breaks measured by IgH locus-specific FISH in WT, XLFΔ/Δ AID−/−, and XLFΔ/ΔAID−/− B metaphases after cells were stimulated for 4 days with αCD40/IL-4. Data represent the mean and standard deviation of multiple experiments. Molecular Cell 2008 31, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.017) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions