TRAX Monitoring of Air Quality in the Salt Lake Valley

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contracting for Laboratory Services Ann Mullin Cleveland US Geological Survey Presented to the Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board April.
Advertisements

1 PM NAAQS: Update on Coarse Particle Monitoring and Research Efforts Lydia Wegman, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA Presentation at the.
Methods Board Report National Water Quality Monitoring Council July 28, 2005.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
Understanding the Weather Leading to Poor Winter Air Quality Erik Crosman 1, John Horel 1, Chris Foster 1, Lance Avey 2 1 University of Utah Department.
1 Public Outreach October 2008 By Adelina Murtezaj – Public Relation Officer For Inaugural Partnership Activity between ICC and ERO.
Alternative Approaches for PM2.5 Mapping: Visibility as a Surrogate Stefan Falke AAAS Science and Engineering Fellow U.S. EPA - Office of Environmental.
Erik Crosman 1, Logan E. Mitchell 1, Alexander Jacques 1, John Horel 1, John C. Lin 1 1 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake.
Our Mission “To improve Nevada County’s air quality by reducing ozone air pollution.” Our mission is accomplished through three strategies.
Emergency Air Monitoring During Wildfires Jim Homolya USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC.
1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.
Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP,
Next Generation Air Monitoring: An Overview of US EPA Activities National Air Quality Conference RTP, NC February 12, 2014 Tim Watkins US EPA/Office of.
MWA Operations Management Plan (OMP, v. 3) Ron Remillard (MIT); MWA Project Meeting, June 6, 2011.
Understanding the Weather Leading to Poor Winter Air Quality Erik Crosman 1, John Horel 1, Chris Foster 1, Lance Avey 2 1 University of Utah Department.
2011 National Air Quality Conferences March , 2011 Development of the USEPA Quality Assurance Guidance for the Collection of Meteorological Data.
Assess Summer Ozone Concentrations over the Great Salt Lake in Relation to Those Along the Wasatch Front Seth Arens, Utah Division of Air Quality John.
John Horel Originally from Eureka, CA San Jose State, University of Washington, Scripps Institution of Oceanography 31 st year at the U/U 8 children, 2.
Mid-Decade Assessment of the United Nations 2010 World Population and Housing Census Program Arona L. Pistiner Office of the Associate Director for 2020.
NATIONAL TRIBAL FORUM ON AIR QUALITY 2013 Establishment of a PM 2.5 Monitoring Network on the Colville Reservation.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
1 Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Network Update Pat Vaca, Air Pollution Specialist
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Air Quality Update Regional Council February 28, 2007.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
Update on the NADP Atmospheric Mercury Initiative Developing a new coordinated and collaborative approach to atmospheric mercury monitoring A Briefing.
Alternative Approaches for PM2.5 Mapping: Visibility as a Surrogate Stefan Falke AAAS Science and Engineering Fellow U.S. EPA - Office of Environmental.
1 National Monitoring Committee Report Bruce Louks WESTAR Fall Meeting Portland, OR September 28, 2010.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS AND HUMAN SERVICESEVALUATION and RESEARCH AND HUMAN SERVICES EVALUATION and RESEARCH Update on the Somatic Cell.
Gridded analyses of near-surface ozone concentration, wind, temperature, and moisture at hourly intervals at 1 km horizontal resolution derived using the.
Annual Air Monitoring Data Certification and Concurrence Process 1.
PACR Technical Committee Convener Call 09 January /9/131.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
Post-Secondary Transition
FY 2017/18 General Budget Workshop
Webinar on the Exposure Draft of CAS Continuing Education Policy
Task Group G Report January 17, 2003
Sources Committee Presentation Spring 2003 WESTAR Business Meeting
FACILITIES. FACILITIES FACILITIES YEAR 1 PRIORITY 1 San Benito CISD will utilize the efficiency audit, prioritize reported items and enlist the Maintenance.
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Establishment of Space Weather Information Service
Region 4 Air Sensor Projects
2 Selecting a Healthcare Information System.
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Kentucky Lead Workgroup Recommendations
How do we carry out the election process last year?
Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Facilities Management Division PROOF –NM (Process Reengineering & Optimization of O&M Functions for New Mexico) Phase II.
Office of Research and Analysis
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Order Processing and Requisition Accelerator
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
2019 Meeting 1 Northern Ontario Safety Group.
Tasks & Grades for MET3.
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
Gulf of Maine State of the Environment Reporting
TRAX Monitoring of Air Quality in the Salt Lake Valley
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
TRAX Monitoring of Air Quality in the Salt Lake Valley
A New Tool for Evaluating Candidate PM FEM and PM2.5 ARM Monitors
TRAX Monitoring of Air Quality in the Salt Lake Valley
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Improving Regional PM2.5 Modeling along Utah’s Wasatch Front
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Fundamental Science Practices (FSP) of the U.S. Geological Survey
Presentation transcript:

TRAX Monitoring of Air Quality in the Salt Lake Valley

History of TRAX Pilot Project 2014-2018 Focused on understanding the spatial and temporal distributions of pollutants as well as how pollution episodes develop and evolve Two sets of pollution monitors installed on TRAX Car 1136  December 2, 2014 Car 1104  February 2, 2016 Requires monthly maintenance & inspection visits Outcomes: Air quality information available via the internet to the public, educators, and researchers http://utahaq.chpc.utah.edu/ Several dozen TV & radio news stories, blogs & press releases Two published scientific papers, several in preparation Over 12 presentations in United States air quality conferences Many presentations involving educators and K-12 students 2

Average Summer Ozone along the Red and Green lines May 2015 – Sept 2015 Hours: 0400-2400 Higher O3 on urban periphery Lower O3 in urban corridor 3

Spatial PM2.5 Concentrations -- Inversion Episode from TRAX

Research-grade Instrumentation Initial Validation Evaluated the TRAX observations against the Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) Hawthorne site maintained by the state of Utah for US EPA regulatory purposes February 2016 PM2.5 (correlation coefficients ~0.87-0.92) Summer 2016 – Summer 2017 O3 (correlation coefficients 0.80-0.86) Much more rigorous validation planned as part of new funded study Monitoring of greenhouse gases and pollutants across an urban area using a light-rail public transit platform Logan E. Mitchell1,*, Erik T. Crosman1, Alexander A. Jacques1, Benjamin Fasoli1, Luke Leclair-Marzolf1, John Horel1, David R. Bowling2, James R. Ehleringer2, John C. Lin1 Atmospheric Environment, In review PM2.5 validation O3 validation NO2 validation

Legislative Support for TRAX in 2018 Session Sen. Luz Escamilla and Rep. Angela Romero showed interest in the TRAX pilot project. Of particular interest to them is to obtain data on the west side communities where no UDAQ regulatory observation sites exist. Sen. Escamilla proposed an appropriation of $100,000 ongoing for 5 years. Daniel and Erik garner support with key appropriations committee members alongside Rep. Romero to make sure legislative support is there for the proposed appropriation. Presentations made to Appropriation Committee and air quality advisory board. Funding appropriation request was approved in March 2018 alongside Utah state budget

Key Message During Legislative Appropriations Process The TRAX Pilot Project has been successful improving understanding of characteristics of air pollution episodes experienced by Salt Lake Valley residents Therefore, continued support of PM2.5 and O3 data collection requires: Sustained air quality monitoring (sensors need replacement or repair/maintenance) Calibrating/QC of data so that it is suitable for public health usage (both real-time exposure and health research)

Next Steps Transitioning from Pilot Study to Operational Data Collection Funding was appropriated to the Utah DEQ from the Utah DNR fund We were told the next step will be to write a proposal to DEQ on deliverables, report schedule, etc Look forward to working synergistically with DAQ to provide spatially resolved data for health studies A budget and statement of work already on public record to the legislature will need to be fleshed out in more detail in proposal to DEQ Monthly/annual reports submitted to DEQ on deliverable tasks

Proposed Year 1 TRAX Air Quality Deliverables Replace aging instruments for PM2.5 and ozone and support communication and other sensor maintenance costs Support research time to conduct rigorous quality control/validation Support data archive for use by scientific and public community Support technician time to install/repair instruments, filters, and required UTA monthly safety inspections Provide detailed documentation (monthly updates, annual report) to DEQ of data archive, QC, validation comparison

Proposed Year 1 TRAX Air Quality Deliverables Continued… Added this slide in response to John H’ comment will let him fill in…info along the lines of: Goal is to provide a high resolution data (temporally order ~1 minute, spatially order 1 km) that can be used synergistically with DEQ FEM fixed site air quality data for health scientists and public policy makers to characterize the variability in criteria pollutants along the TRAX train routes Value of this data for looking at meteorological controls on pollution variability (e.g., dust storms, lake breezes, shallow inversions) has already been shown

Making the Data Usable and Trustworthy Pilot project was successful but did not include funding for quality control or validation of the data collected. Frequent calibration and inspection/flow checking of PM2.5 and O3 sensors Due to recommendations of Air Quality Advisory board chairperson Kerry Kelly and Dept. of Atmos Sci Professor Gannet Hallar, we will deploy 2 PM2.5 validation stations with identical instruments as on the train – one at the DEQ Hawthorne location and one located along the TRAX line

Purchase New Air Quality Sensors Met one ES-642 Nephalometer Temperature/Humidity/Pressure GPS 2B Ozone 205 FEM monitor Data loggers Cell modems Data are publicly available via the web links: http://utahaq.chpc.utah.edu/aqmobile https://air.utah.edu/ 12

Preliminary Draft Year 1 Budget Replace aging instrument and communications equipment Monthly inspections Maintenance/repairs Calibration Validation Data QC and archive for public health Public access to data Data user support 2018-2019 Budget for TRAX Sensor System Ongoing Operation Subtotal O&M for 2 train sensor systems per year:   1 part-time maintenance technician (inspections; repairs; calibration) ~20,000 2 part-time research scientists (grad student; post-doc) for QC and 3-year data archive validation/calibration, research and public access and user support ~20,911 Sensor repair, maintenance (pumps, filters, factory calibration), cellular communications ~10,000 Replacement of sensors (no indirect cost) ~40,000 University of Utah indirect cost for state agencies 9,091 Subtotal for ongoing annual costs 100,000 13

Thank You!