Open access in the post-2014 REF: an overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Services. edgehill.ac.uk/ls Zoe Clarke and Yvonne Smith The Digital Researcher: Trends in Open Access Publishing.
Advertisements

Professor Andrew J Deeks PVC (Science) Durham University.
Ben Johnson, HEFCE 15 May 2014 IN A POST-2014 REF.
OA and REF: Jisc support Neil Jacobs Head of Scholarly Communications Support E M Skype neil.jacobs1
Open access in the post-2014 REF: an overview. Introduction This slide pack covers the main points of the four UK HE funding bodies’ policy for open access.
Open Access, Research Funders and the Research Excellence Framework Open Access Team, Library.
Open Access, Research Funders and the REF Open Access Team, Library.
Library Services REF2020 & Open Access : How to comply? Dr. Nancy Pontika Research Information Manager (Open
Open Access What’s Happening? Nia Wyn Roberts, March 2015.
Why Open Access? RCUK HEFCE Horizon Introduction This slide pack covers the main points of the four UK HE funding bodies’ policy for open access.
Open Access Open Access Team, Library
Open Access. "There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this [peer reviewed journal]
Connecting you with information, support and your community Yvonne Budden Scholarly Communications Manager, University of Warwick, UK Open Access Opportunities,
Title of presentation - Your name Audience – Date.
OA, metadata, REF Ben Johnson HEFCE. Contents Reminder of REF policy for open access Introduction to information and audit requirements Next steps Questions.
Lessons in Open Access Compliance for Higher Education (LOCH) Dominic Tate Scholarly Communications Manager University of Edinburgh.
Open Access and REF2020 How not to let new HEFCE rules ruin your life.
Open access and the next REF Royal Holloway 22 October 2014 Steven #OAREF.
Open Access: the post 2014 REF and the University Publications Policy Pat Spoor Nicola Barnett June 2015
© University of Reading October 2009 CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Introduction for ‘early adopters’ Alison.
Improving health worldwidewww.lshtm.ac.uk REF2020 at LSHTM.
Open Access Publishing Nadine Lewycky, Senior Manager, Research Strategy & Planning Chris Biggs, Metadata and Repository Specialist.
Open Access & Research Assessment Dealing with UK Open Access Requirements in Practice Dominic Tate Scholarly Communications Manager Edinburgh University.
Improving health worldwidewww.lshtm.ac.uk REF2020 at LSHTM.
Open Access Opportunities, Policies & Rights IAS ACE Programme 19 November 2015.
OPEN ACCESS NOTES 18 MARCH 2015 Afzal Hasan, Librarian.
The United States Department of Transportation. The United States Department of Transportation Public Access Plan is still under development and is subject.
Open Access and the Research Excellence Framework
Open Access & REF202*.  Green OA  Deposit of pre-print or post-print of accepted paper for publishing within a repository.  Gold OA  Published version.
An open-access REF: the whys and wherefores Aberystwyth University 24 October 2014 Ben Johnson.
Research Outputs - Services for Staff and Students Valerie McCutcheon
{ OA Policy implementation: Chemical Sciences Ljilja Ristic MScChem PGLIS MCLIP Physical Sciences Consultant & Subject Librarian, RSL February 2016.
REF: Open access requirements Directorate of Academic Support December 2015.
Using RMS to comply with Open Access Requirements Betsy Fuller Research Repository Librarian Information Services.
Open Access and the Research Excellence Framework
Complying with HEFCE open access requirement for eligibility to REF2021 submission How to create a record in Pure and upload your ‘Author’s Accepted Manuscript’
Things that you need to know about Open Access, the REF and the CRIS Rowena Rouse Scholarly Communications Manager May 2016.
Open Access, the next REF and the CRIS Rowena Rouse Scholarly Communications Manager March 2016.
12 things that you need to know about Open Access, the REF and the CRIS Rowena Rouse Scholarly Communications Manager June 2016.
Using RMS to comply with the new REF Open Access Requirement Betsy Fuller Research Repository Librarian Information Services.
Communication and dissemination of research – 15 April 2016 Tristram Hooley, Emma Butler and Lucy Ayre.
RCUK Policy on Open Access: Terms and Compliance Repositories Support Project Event London, May 2013 Mari Williams BBSRC.
HEFCE policy on open access for the next REF Liz Neilly Michelle Double June 2016.
Open Access and Open Data Services at the University of Cambridge
NRF Open Access Statement
How Has REF Changed Open Access?
Doctorate extension scheme
Why should I put my research on HIRA?
Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.
Open Access and the post-2014 REF Policy update - October 2015
Open access, embargoes and your thesis
Open Access, Research Funders, Research Data, and the REF
Are you making the most of Open Access?
Welcome slide.
Institutional Repository and Friends
REF 2021 Briefing 25 January 2018.
Open Access to your Research Papers and Data
SFU Open Access Policy Endorsed by Senate January 9, 2017
An Introduction to Open Access and Research Data Management
The REF open access policy
Funding body requirements
Open access in REF – Planning Workshop
Open Access: News and Developments
Towards Excellence in Research: Achievements and Visions of
Open Access and.
An open-access REF: the quick version
Open access in REF – Planning Workshop
Why should I put my research on HIRA?
Unlocking the door: Open Access Janet Smith
Presentation transcript:

Open access in the post-2014 REF: an overview

Introduction This slide pack covers the main points of the four UK HE funding bodies’ policy for open access in relation to the post-2014 Research Excellence Framework. The policy states that certain outputs must be available in an open-access form to be eligible for submission to the next REF.

Definition of outputs within scope Outputs meeting both parts of the below definition are within scope of this policy and will need to fulfil open access criteria. Definition of outputs within scope Output is a journal article or a conference proceeding with an ISSN* Output was accepted for publication after 1 April 2016 * Conference proceedings that form part of a book series are out of scope.

Outputs not in scope The following outputs are therefore out of scope: Monographs and other long-form publications Non-text, creative and practice-based research Research data However, where an institution can demonstrate that it has taken steps towards enabling open access for outputs outside the scope of this definition, credit will be given in the research environment component of the post-2014 REF.

Open access criteria (1) Outputs meeting the definition must satisfy all of the following requirements to be treated as open-access. Deposit requirements Output must be deposited in an institutional or subject repository within three months of being accepted for publication. Output must be deposited as the final, peer-reviewed text (as a minimum).

Open access criteria (2) Outputs meeting the definition must satisfy all of the following requirements to be treated as open-access. Discovery requirements Output must be discoverable to anyone with an internet connection, and to search engines.

Open access criteria (3) Outputs meeting the definition must satisfy all of the following requirements to be treated as open-access. Access requirements Output must allow anyone with internet access to search electronically within the text, read it and download it without charge. The access requirements must be fulfilled as soon as any embargo period has elapsed. Embargo periods should not exceed the following maxima: 12 months for REF main panels A and B 24 months for REF main panels C and D

Text-mining Outputs do not need to allow text-mining to fulfil the open access criteria. However, where an institution can demonstrate that outputs are presented in a form that allows text-mining, credit will be given in the research environment component of the post- 2014 REF.

Exceptions to the requirements (1) Occasionally, it will not be possible for an output to fulfil the criteria. An exception is allowed in the following cases. Deposit exceptions (these outputs are considered out of scope of the policy): Individual was not employed by a UK HEI at the point of acceptance Individual was unable to secure the use of a repository Individual experienced a delay securing the final peer-reviewed text (e.g. for multi-authored papers) It would be unlawful, or present a security risk, to deposit the output

Exceptions to the requirements (2) Access exceptions (these outputs must still be deposited): Output depends on third party content for which open access rights could not be granted The publication concerned requires an embargo period that exceeds the stated maxima, and was the most appropriate for the output The publication concerned actively disallows open-access deposit, and was the most appropriate for the output

Exceptions to the requirements (3) Technical exceptions (these outputs are considered out of scope of the policy): At acceptance, the individual was at a different UK HEI that failed to comply A short-term technical failure within the repository prevented compliance An external service provider failure prevented compliance (e.g. a subject repository ceased to operate)

Exceptions to the requirements (4) Other exceptions There may be very unusual cases where an output could not meet the criteria for a reason not covered above. A short written explanation will be required Such cases should be extremely rare A process for considering these ‘other’ exceptions will be established in due course

What does non-compliance mean? If an output is submitted to the post-2014 REF that was: within the definition not compliant with all of the criteria and no valid exception was recorded then that output will receive an unclassified score in the REF.

Further information For further information about this policy, please email openaccess@hefce.ac.uk