Warm Up Identify the hypothesis and conclusion of each conditional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sec.2-3 Deductive Reasoning
Advertisements

Do Now Try to extend the following patterns. What would be next? 1.January, March, May …. 2.7, 14, 21, 28, …. 3.1, 4, 9, 16, …. 4.1, 6, 4, 9, 7, 12, 10,
2.5 If-Then Statements and Deductive Reasoning
Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning
Warm Up Determine if each statement is true or false. 1. The measure of an obtuse angle is less than 90°. 2. All perfect-square real numbers are positive.
Warm Up Write a conditional statement questions 1 and The intersection of two lines is a point. 2. An odd number is one more than a multiple of 2.
Chapter 2 Geometric Reasoning
2-4 Rules of Logic What is deductive reasoning?
The original conditional and its contrapositive are logically equivalent. Example. If the bird is Red, then the bird is a Robin. AND If the bird is not.
Warm Up Identify the hypothesis and conclusion of each conditional. 1. A mapping that is a reflection is a type of transformation. 2. The quotient of two.
Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Warm Up Make a conjecture based on the following information.  For points A, B and C, AB = 2, BC = 3, and AC = 4. A, B, and C form an equilateral triangle.
Objective Understand the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.
Holt Geometry 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures Welcome to our Unit on Logic. Over the next three days, you will be learning the basics.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.
Warm Up Underline the hypothesis and circle the conclusion of each conditional. 1. A mapping that is a reflection is a type of transformation. 2. The quotient.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures Holt Geometry Warm Up Warm Up.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Determine if each conjecture is true or false. If false, provide a counterexample.
Deductive Reasoning What can you D…D….D…. DEDUCE ?
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.
Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Using deductive reasoning. Objective.
WARM UP. DEDUCTIVE REASONING LEARNING OUTCOMES I will be able to use the law of detachment and syllogism to make conjectures from other statements I.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Students will… Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical.
C HAPTER Using deductive reasoning. O BJECTIVES Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
2.4 Deductive Reasoning 2.5 Postulates Geometry R/H Students will be able to distinguish between Inductive and Deductive Reasoning, and to determine the.
Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Holt Geometry 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures Welcome to our Unit on Logic. Over the next three days, you will be learning the basics.
Holt Geometry 2-4 Biconditional Statements and Definitions Write and analyze biconditional statements. Objective.
CONFIDENTIAL 1 Grade 9 Algebra1 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures.
Reasoning, Conditionals, and Postulates Sections 2-1, 2-3, 2-5.
Geometry 2-3 Law of Syllogism The Law of Syllogism allows you to draw conclusions from two conditional statements. Law of Syllogism If p  q and q  r.
LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning
Holt Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Chapter 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning.
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
2-3 Deductive Reasoning Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz
Drill: Tuesday, 10/14 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.
Logic.
2.4 Deductive Reasoning 2.4 Deductive Reasoning.
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Do Now: Name each point , line, and line segment, or ray
02-2: Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Math Humor Q: How is a geometry classroom like the United Nations?
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Drill: Wednesday, 11/1 Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. Write the contrapositive.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2.3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Learning Target Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof 2-4: Deductive Reasoning Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2-1: Logic with Inductive Reasoning
Presentation transcript:

Warm Up Identify the hypothesis and conclusion of each conditional. 1. A mapping that is a reflection is a type of transformation. 2. The quotient of two negative numbers is positive. 3. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. H: A mapping is a reflection. C: The mapping is a transformation. H: Two numbers are negative. C: The quotient is positive. False; x = 0.

Homework – Page 85 Questions on 53, 59 and 60 from yesterday’s work X -3 -1 4 Y -5 1 9 X -2 4 6 Y -9 -4 11 Please Circle problems 36 (If a number is < -4 then the number is < -1) and problem 51 (H ~b implies a)

Vocabulary deductive reasoning Law of Syllogism Law of Detachment Deductive reasoning is the process of using logic to draw conclusions from given facts, definitions, and properties. From lesson 2-1, when several examples form a pattern and you assume the pattern will continue, you are applying inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is the process of reasoning that a rule or statement is true because specific cases are true.

Is the conclusion a result of inductive or deductive reasoning? There is a myth that you can balance an egg on its end only on the spring equinox. A person was able to balance an egg on July 8, September 21, and December 19. Therefore this myth is false. Since the conclusion is based on a pattern of observations, it is a result of inductive reasoning.

Is the conclusion a result of inductive or deductive reasoning? There is a myth that the Great Wall of China is the only man-made object visible from the Moon. The Great Wall is barely visible in photographs taken from 180 miles above Earth. The Moon is about 237,000 miles from Earth. Therefore, the myth cannot be true. The conclusion is based on logical reasoning from scientific research. It is a result of deductive reasoning.

In deductive reasoning, if the given facts are true and you apply the correct logic, then the conclusion must be true. The Law of Detachment is one valid form of deductive reasoning. Law of Detachment If p  q is a true statement and p is true, then q is true.

Determine if the conjecture is valid by the Law of Detachment. Given: If a student passes his classes, the student is eligible to play sports. Ramon passed his classes. Conjecture: Ramon is eligible to play sports. First, identify the hypothesis and conclusion in the given conditional. If a student passes his classes, then the student is eligible to play sports. The statement “Ramon passed his classes” matches the hypothesis of a true conditional. By the Law of Detachment, Ramon is eligible to play sports. The conjecture is valid.

Determine if the conjecture is valid by the Law of Detachment. Given: If the side lengths of some triangle are 5 cm, 12 cm, and 13 cm, then the area of that triangle must be 30 cm2. The area of ∆PQR is 30 cm2. Conjecture: The side lengths of ∆PQR are 5cm, 12 cm, and 13 cm. Identify the hypothesis and conclusion in the given conditional. If the side lengths of a triangle are 5 cm, 12 cm, and 13 cm, then the area of the triangle is 30 cm2. The given statement “The area of ∆PQR is 30 cm2” matches the conclusion of a true conditional. But this does not mean the hypothesis is true. The dimensions of the triangle could be different. So the conjecture is not valid.

Another valid form of deductive reasoning is the Law of Syllogism Another valid form of deductive reasoning is the Law of Syllogism. It allows you to draw conclusions from two conditional statements when the conclusion of one is the hypothesis of the other. Law of Syllogism If p  q and q  r are true statements, then p  r is a true statement. What algebra property do we see replicated in the law of syllogism? The transitive property: If a = b and b = c, then a = c

Determine if the conjecture is valid by the Law of Syllogism. Given: If a figure is a kite, then it is a quadrilateral. If a figure is a quadrilateral, then it is a polygon. . Conjecture: If a figure is a kite, then it is a polygon.

Let p, q, and r represent the following. Given: If a figure is a kite, then it is a quadrilateral. If a figure is a quadrilateral, then it is a polygon. . Conjecture: If a figure is a kite, then it is a polygon. p: A figure is a kite. q: A figure is a quadrilateral. r: A figure is a polygon. You are given that p q and q r. Since q is the conclusion of the first conditional and the hypothesis of the second conditional, you can conclude that p r. The conjecture is valid by Law of Syllogism.

Let x, y, and z represent the following. Determine if the conjecture is valid by the Law of Syllogism. Given: If a number is divisible by 2, then it is even. If a number is even, then it is an integer. Conjecture: If a number is an integer, then it is divisible by 2. Let x, y, and z represent the following. We are given that x y and y z. x: A number is divisible by 2. y: A number is even. The Law of Syllogism cannot be used to deduce that z x. The conjecture is not valid. z: A number is an integer.

Determine if the conjecture is valid by the Law of Syllogism. Given: If an animal is a mammal, then it has hair. If an animal is a dog, then it is a mammal. Conjecture: If an animal is a dog, then it has hair. Let x, y, and z represent the following. Since x is the conclusion of the second conditional and the hypothesis of the first conditional, you can conclude that z y. The conjecture is valid by Law of Syllogism. x: An animal is a mammal. y: An animal has hair. z: An animal is a dog. We are given that x y and z x.

Lesson Quiz deductive reasoning Is the conclusion a result of inductive or deductive reasoning? 1. At Reagan High School, students must pass Geometry before they take Algebra 2. Emily is in Algebra 2, so she must have passed Geometry. deductive reasoning

Determine if each conjecture is valid? 2. Given: If n is a natural number, then n is an integer. If n is an integer, then n is a rational number. 0.875 is a rational number. Conjecture: 0.875 is a natural number. not valid 3. Given: If an American citizen is at least 18 years old, then they are eligible to vote. Anna is a 20-year-old American citizen. Conjecture: Anna is eligible to vote. valid

Assignment today is page 91: 9-18, 20, 23-25 and page 94: 2. Remember that homework help is always available at http://www.thinkcentral.com/index.htm Today’s keyword is “MG7 2-3”.