Collective decision making

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Società Italiana Brevetti – Roma
Advertisements

WIPO Roundtable on IP & Traditional Knowledge Geneva, November 1-2, 1999 Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A Global IP Issue Presenter: Richard Owens,
Documentation and Digitization of Intangible Cultural Heritage: the Experience of WIPO International Conference on Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage.
An overview of extraordinarily good performance by SA assets including listed Real Estate Recent performance - property re-rates vs Bonds Performance.
The ‘Right to Participate in Decision-Making’ as a Farmers’ Right in Southern Africa: Success Stories Nyasha E. Chishakwe CTDT November 2010.
The Convention on Biological Diversity, access to genetic resources and IPR Yovana Reyes Tagle University of Helsinki.
“Undoing the Knot in A&BS Transactions: In Search of Amicable Solutions” Introduction Gerd Winter.
THE LAW MAKING PROCESS OF AN ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING REGIME IN KENYA Presented By: Anne N. Angwenyi National Environment Management Authority (Kenya)
Avenues for protecting and preserving TK within IPRs Professor Pamela Andanda, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand and Visiting Fellow, WTI,
Biopiracy Biopiracy is defined as, “the illegal appropriation of life – micro-organisms, plants and animals (including humans) and the traditional knowledge.
Session 1. Group 1: Implications of multiple- purpose forestry for information providers (Horrendous, unfamiliar, stressful) Wide audience – wide net.
Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge, Genetic Resources and Traditional Cultural Expressions: Overview of Issues, Options and Recent International.
THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN PROTECTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE The Philippine Experience Presented by: Marga C. Domingo-Morales Senior Policy.
Breakaway Session Traditional Knowledge Protection and IPR Issues (17 th November, 2006) Mr. V K Gupta Director, NISCAIR, New Delhi International Conclave.
Traditional Knowledge at the International Level Debra Harry Executive Director Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism
Department of Science and Technology Portfolio Committee: Trade and Industry 27 July 2010.
Naam Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society .
Protection of Traditional Knowledge -The Indian Perspective A presentation by Desh Deepak Verma, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt.
PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF IPLAB/PTK WORKS AND DESIGNS Prof Owen Dean Chair of Intellectual Property Law Stellenbosch University.
The Trust Company Strategic Partners Symposium Partnership & Collaboration October 2013.
RENEE LE ROUX SABIF MANAGER WHY SABIF ? (SOUTH AFRICAN NODE OF GBIF) To create an enabling platform for researchers in South Africa –to.
“PERUVIAN EXPERIENCE IN THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE” Presentation by Minister Counsellor Betty Berendson, Deputy Permanent Representative of.
Research Involving Aboriginal Peoples: Canadian Policy Experience Doris Cook, PhD, MPH Global Forum on Bioethics in Research Auckland, New Zealand December.
TRADITIONAL MEDICINE LANDSCAPE IN SOUTH AFRICA
Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Session 7: IPRs II: How Intellectual Property Rights Can Affect the Daily.
The Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge Puzzle Wend Wendland, Director, Traditional Knowledge Division.
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
SBRAVI S.Bala Ravi M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation India PANEL DISCUSSION: What are the perceived and historic risks associated with non-commercial.
Innovation and Commercialization
Perspective of Countries of Origin Same risks and perceptions but different approaches? Monica Ribadeneira Sarmiento Bonn, November
Directorate INFSO E meeting The public domain in the information Society.
Globalization. What is Globalization? Globalization: The increased movement of people, knowledge and ideas, and goods and money across national borders.
NGO Initiatives in Advancing Civil Society Safeguards and Conservation GEF Civil Society Consultation Luis Pabon November, 2009.
Assessments ASSESSMENTS. Assessments The Rationale and Purpose for Assessments.
Lessons learnt form the SA Bioprospecting Framework
Lesson 8: Financial Statement Analysis for Governments
Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill – Comments received from the National House of Traditional Leaders ( ) Presentation to the Portfolio.
Comments on Access and Benefit-Sharing Provisions of the Biodiversity Bill Rachel Wynberg & Markus Burgener On behalf of IUCN-South Africa.
1.
SOCIAL,ETHICAL AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Intellectual property and Copyright basics
Portfolio Committee on Trade & Industry
ACHIEVING EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF TK
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
Photo credit: Hannah Letinich
Community protection of geographical indications :
Financial Planning Association of Indiana
Florabela Carausu GOPA Luxembourg Margarita Rohr
Group Discussion 1: Structure & Organisation of a research society
Types of Economic Systems
Basic economic systems Command economy Vs. Free Market Economy
The ‘Right to Participate in Decision-Making’ as a Farmers’ Right in Southern Africa: Success Stories Nyasha E. Chishakwe CTDT November 2010.
Non Tariff Trade Barriers to Traditional Medicine Products
Online conference on Options for Farmers’ Rights
Presenter Name Affiliation Date
The Global Landscape of IP/TK
Pre-assigned groups Chair & Rapporteurs Workshop goals
CONNECTING INSPIRING EVOLVING ACHIEVING ENABLING LEARNING DECIDING
IAPP TRUSTe SYMPOSIUM 9-11 JUNE 2004
The Challenges of Working in a Family Business
o UTLINE… Publicly financed research: policy issues around IPR
1999 MOSAICC 2001 CBD BONN GUIDELINES
Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development,
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Nagoya Protocol on Access & Benefit Sharing Arising from the Utilization of Biological Resources GEF/UNEP-SPREP Regional Project on the Ratification of.
The Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge Puzzle
Introduction to IP, TK and TCEs
Please include this slide if you answered “yes” to at least one of the questions.
The globalisation of the economy The development of new technologies
Why Do People Need Information?
Presentation transcript:

Collective decision making What is a community? Community Shared ethnicity Shared values Common cause Collective decision making An indigenous community for the purposes of the Bill could be any group of people who live in SA. The Bill seems to acknowledge the dynamism of the ‘traditional’ and its only requirement for legitimacy is its recognition as such by an indigenous community

Triggers for protection Aspirational Defensive Protection is triggered either by an aspiration towards an economic opportunity (e.g. royalties) or a need to defend its collective nature (e.g. to prevent appropriation and to allow free non-commercial use). The Bill is a mix of but raises the question of who benefits from the opportunities and sets the terms of use

Public domain vs. public availability Indigenous community Traditional knowledge (TK) Public domain/availability Protection under the bill is linked to knowledge in the public domain. If knowledge is a secret, then the ‘indigenous community/company’ can get standard IPR protections and don’t need the database - The TK is ‘publicly available’. The Bill recognizes and undercuts this by denying the community the right to set the terms of access

-Community contribution versus state collection The Database Community contributions Public DATABASE Defensive and aspirational -Community contribution versus state collection Indian model- PBR (community led and focused on rights recognition) versus TKDL (state led and restricted access-defensive). So who decides when TK is actually in the public domain for it to then be owned by the State (in the case of the Bill- the Fund)

General beneficiaries TRUST FUND Trust fund New and continued use General beneficiaries A utilization approach to royalties and challenges of retroactivity Bioprospecting trust fund versus traditional intellectual property trust fund- general beneficiaries versus specific beneficiaries

Challenge based models Rights based approach to TK Protection based approach to TK State owns all knowledge in public domain and wants to keep it in the public domain State owns all knowledge in public domain and wants to profit from its use Communities own their knowledge and set terms of access and benefit sharing Community knowledge commons that foreground community values of knowledge sharing