Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 7 February 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Project Nexus Analysis of impacts and next steps Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus UNC Workgroup 03 April 2012.
Advertisements

Nexus Workgroup Transition Approach Update 8 th January 2014.
Review of industry code governance 26 March 2010.
Concept Analysis Document Executive Summary Template, (To view template instructions – Save this template to project files, reopen and then select View,
PowerPoint Proposal: User Guide When to useLarger or more corporate businesses. Please note: When deciding what type of proposal to create you need to.
Mod for Discussion on 7 th January 2011 Draft Outline of Potential Refinements to the User Pays Modification Process Action RG Based on discussions.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May : EU Capacity Regulations – Capacity Allocation Mechanisms with Congestion Management Procedures.
Proposer: insert Panel Date: insert 0XXX: Mod Title: insert title Guidance: These slides are meant to provide a brief overview for the UNC Panel, to introduce.
Modification Proposal 0246: Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity User Commitment Chris Shanley.
Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February : Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.
11 User Pays User Committee 12th November Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
Proposer: Hayley Burden Panel Date: 17th April : Mod Title: Imbalance Charge amendments required to align the UNC with the Network Code on Gas.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May 0501: Treatment of Existing Entry Capacity Rights at the Bacton ASEP to comply with EU Capacity Regulations.
Administrative Changes to the UK-Link Manual Modification 414 and SIS Removal David Addison.
Mod Proposal Prevention of "Timing Out" of Authority decisions on Modification Proposals Nick Reeves.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
Legal Text Production Options for Discussion. Legal Text Production 2 Issues with current approach Issues with the current approach to legal text production.
Development Modification Proposal: Introduction of an Inter-day Linepack Product Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 19 November 2010.
Literature review Methods
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 20/10/16
CGR2 Summary Proposals UNC Panel 18 October 2012.
Manifest Errors for Entry Capacity Overruns Workgroup 364
Indiana U t Wendy Balmer
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
CSEP NExA Update Marie Clark ScottishPower 28th September 2006.
Proposer: BP Gas Marketing Ltd Panel Date: 17 April 2014
On the move Template.
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
Assignment Workshop 2 16th September 09, Solihull.
Discussion on Mod262 and next steps
CSS Update for CoMC 19th September 2018
UNC 0621L: Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
7th July 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon
UNC 0XXX: Mod Title: insert title
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 16th January 2014
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014
Proposer: Penny Garner Panel Date: 19 April 2018
UNC Modification Proposal 0362
Topic raised at July 2009 Distribution Workstream
UNC Section H Clarification
DN Interruption & Charging
UNC Modification Proposal 0385 Inclusion of DNOs as Users in User Pays Arrangements Phil Lucas 7 June 2011.
Modification Proposal 0474: Inclusion of the guidelines relating to the “Customer Settlement Error Claims Process” within UNC governance.
Proposer: Transporter /
Interruptible to Firm – NTS Supply Point Transition
Transporter Initiated SPA Confirmations on behalf of User Potential Impact Discussion with UK Link Committee.
Transmission Workstream 2nd December 2010
UNC 0621L: Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
Modification proposal 330
Modification 0448 – European Driven Change Process Flow Diagram
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
SSP – PROVISIONAL LSP – SSP AMENDMENT RULES
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Energy Solutions Ltd
Title slide [from Title Slide master]
Implementation Approach Distribution Workgroup – June 2014
Transmission Workstream 05 November 2009
Mod 0489 EU Balancing Code - Information Provision changes required to align the UNC with the EU Code Debbie Brace 25th April 2014.
Enabling Large Scale Utilisation of Class 3
Proposer: Steve Mulinganie, Gazprom Energy Panel Date: 20th June 2019
Xoserve Draft UIG Incentives Modifications 20 May 2019
Proposer: Tracey Saunders, Northern Gas Networks
Presentation transcript:

Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 7 February 2014 0482: Mod Title:Proposed Changes to Mod 81 Reports to be effective from 01/10/13 Guidance: These slides are meant to provide a brief overview for the UNC Panel, to introduce what is trying to be achieved, to help them understand and decide the best process to be followed for new modifications. Please aim to be as brief as possible and not justify nor make the case for the Modification. Notes are provided in italics and if this template is being used should be removed. The Joint Office is available to help and support the drafting of any modifications, including guidance on completion of the Modification template and the wider modification process. Contact: enquiries@gasgovernance.co.uk or 0121 288 2107. Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 7 February 2014

Why change? Please use bullets to summarise what in the UNC is wrong and creating problems UNC Section G 1.6.18 – 1.6.20 requires Transporters to publish information regarding the manner in which the AQ review is conducted. These reports are commonly referred to as “Mod 81 Reports”. The current drafting of UNC, Section G, Paragraph 1.6.18(a) requires that for each User, in aggregate across all EUCs, the number of successful AQ amendment applications made is reported. Current reporting based on all successful amendments has the potential to distort the overall picture of AQ movements (increasing and decreasing) This issue has been discussed at the AQ Operational Workgroup and of those attendees who expressed a view, the proposed changes were supported.

Options Please use bullets to summarise what options have been considered to fix the identified problem. Is a UNC modification the only route? Amend current drafting of UNC, Section G, Paragraph 1.6.18 – 20 to replace references to “successful amendments” to “effective amendments”. Consequently this will require changes to be made to the current Mod 81 Reports Ensure that terminology used within Mod 81 Reporting column headings aligns with UNC Terminology

Solution Please use bullets to briefly outline the solution contained within the modification. Mod 81 Reports 1, 2 and 3 are amended to report on effective AQ amendments. Terminology used within the reporting column headings will be amended to align with UNC terminology. Mod 81 Reporting is currently not subject to User Pays Charging. Xoserve has indicated that minimal costs will be incurred as a result of this Modification.

Recommended Steps Please use bullets to summarise the recommended steps. Please indicate how long you think the assessment process should last and if self-governance should apply or not. The Proposer recommends that this modification should be: (delete as appropriate) Subject to self-governance route