Joint Implementation and the Clean Development Mechanism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PACE Centre Clean Development Mechanism Project Developers Workshop, May 2005 Small-Scale CDM Operation & Opportunities in South Africa South African PACE.
Advertisements

UNFCCC Recent Challenges in Implementing PoAs from a Commercial Perspective 8 th May 2011 Mischa Classen Senior Project Manager Regulatory Affairs and.
PoA Challenges & Opportunities
Global GHG Market Update Daniele Violetti Team Leader Registration and Issuance Unit Sustainable Development Mechanisms Programme UNFCCC Carbon Forum America.
SDM Strategy SDM Joint Coordination Workshop
UNFCCC secretariat, Sustainable Development Mechanisms Verónica Colerio, Standard Setting Unit Standardized Baselines in the CDM: Decisions and Way Forward.
Wrap-up session 1 st Sustainable Development Mechanisms Joint Coordination Workshop Maritim Hotel Bonn Germany, March 2012.
T HE W ORLD B ANK C ARBON F INANCE U NIT Standardised Baselines Framework March 24-25, Bonn.
1 Validation and registration Verification and issuance Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 20 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
CDM – LULUCF Project Cycle Winrock International Sandra Brown Training Seminar for BioCarbon Fund Projects.
UNFCCC Secretariat Overview of the CDM and the CDM project Cycle Training-Workshop to support the “Uganda Municipal Waste Compost Programme” Kampala, Uganda,
World Bank/KenGen Workshop on CDM Project Methodologies and Preparation October 3 & 4, 2006 CDM Contracting and Legal Issues.
Idea’ for JISC Maurits Blanson Henkemans Netherlands Montreal.
Joint Implementation & Gas Flaring Reduction Projects Alexandrina Platonova-Oquab Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank.
Greenhouse Gas ASSESSING & MANAGING CLIMATE CHANGE RISK BROKERAGE & STRATEGIC SERVICES 1 Key Elements of a Successful Market-Based GHG Offset Program Key.
KYOTO PROTOCOL MECHANISMS EURASIA 歐亞 Solicitors and Advocates.
Annual Meeting of the Host Country Committee on Carbon Finance Washington D.C. February 15-16, The World Bank Carbon Funds:
A Business Case for the Gold Standard Heidi Forbes Gold Standard and the Clean Development Mechanism Capacity Building Workshop 7 th December 2006.
Introduction of technical paper Funding adaptation in developing countries: extending the share of proceeds used to assist in meeting the costs of adaptation;
Introduction to Climate Change: - global warming - basis steps in a clean development project - connection of CDM with European Trading Scheme Wim Maaskant.
Natsource LLC Proprietary and Confidential- Not to be Reproduced Natsource Asset Management 1 Presentation to the Annual Meeting of Host Country Committee.
GF I NVEST AG F INANCIAL S OLUTIONS 1 Introduction to the Emissions Market February 2008 Mélanie Stauffer GF I NVEST AG F INANCIAL S OLUTIONS.
Emission reduction value in financing clean energy projects By Jan-Willem Martens EcoSecurities.
Overview and Introduction to Technology Transfer Report Final TETRIS Workshop Brussels Dirk Forrister Natsource Europe Ltd 30 November 2006 Some new thinking.
Overview of Carbon Markets Voluntary & Compliance Markets: Existing Carbon Reduction Units Vladimir Litvak RBEC Energy and Environment Practice Leader.
© 2006 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Proprietary and Confidential. Not For Distribution Without Prior Written Permission. State and Trends of the.
GEF and CDM/JI: similarities, differences, linkages, synergies GEF Training Workshop, Almaty, October 6-9, 2004.
Financing climate-friendly projects in the Balkan region DAC PROJECT CAPACITY BUILDING IN BALKAN COUNTRIES IN ORDER TO DEAL WITH CLIMATE CHANGE Prepared.
Practical Experience with Small-scale Projects: Issues and Suggestions Johannes Heister, Lasse Ringius Carbon Finance Unit, World Bank Bonn, 9-10 March.
1 Overview and Status: CDM and JI Heather McGeory Project Manager, Natsource Introductory Workshop on the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) & Joint Implementation.
CD4CDM Review of Workshop 1 ….innovating energy solutions…. KITE, SSN & UNEP.
Demystifying Carbon Credit
14 November 2006 UNFCCC Side Event, COP/MOP, Nairobi Development and Implementation of a JI Track 2 project Manfred Stockmayer Director Camco International.
1 Technology Transfer and Investment Risk in International Emissions Trading FP6 – Priority 8 - Policy-oriented Research Funded by: European Commission,
1 Basics of CDM Development Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 18 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
Carbon Revenue and MFIs: Making it Work Marco van der Linden Ramesh K. Gautam.
Structure of the presentation The origins of CDM What is the CDM? Players of CDM.
1 Market View of JI in the National Context Ben Feldman Managing Director Natsource LLC UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, Germany.
Project Transaction Costs Investment Costs/ Risk Areas of Concern C.E.R.
Role of the Carbon Markets in Harnessing Ambition for Closing the pre-2020 Gap Hugh Sealy, Chair, CDM Executive Board Latin American and Caribbean Carbon.
TÜV SÜD Group Carbon Management Service Methodology and Project Development – Notions of a DOE Methodology and Project Development – Notions of a DOE PCF.
1 Jorund Buen Partner/Director, Point Carbon UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation 10 March 2006 Early mover JI projects.
Seite Hier steht ein thematisches Foto Demand side perspective on JI UNFCCC Side event on Joint Implementation Gertraud Wollansky Federal Ministry.
JISC work on Small Scale JI Projects UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn 9 th March 2006 By: Fatou Ndeye Gaye and Evgeny Sokolov.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
INTRODUCTION “The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007” Greenhouse emissions in 1997 Carbon dioxide emissions World Health Organization Threat.
Sellers’ strategies regarding Joint Implementation Company Perspective
Italian policies and programmes on JI
CDM –Functional Overview
Cost Efficient Emissions Reduction
Spanish Policy on flexible mechanisms
Green Investment Schemes - Concepts, Ideas, Challenges
Baltic Sea Region Testing Ground Facility
UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation
Land use, land-use change and forestry projects under JI in theory and practice B. Schlamadinger and N. Bird Joanneum Research, Austria C. Streck and.
Buyers' and Seller's Perspectives on JI : The Fund Perspective
Prices for Emission Reductions
Eligibility issues and joint implementation
DNV experiences and viewpoints
UNFCCC JI Workshop, Bonn
Joint Implementation A Parties and Buyers Perspective
Buyer's strategies regarding Joint Implementation
Baseline setting and monitoring under JI compared to the CDM approach
The various tracks of JI…
Presentation title Maritim Hotel Bonn Germany, March 2012
Small Scale Projects – Learning from the CDM Paul Soffe
Theoretical differences between CDM and JI validation/determination
Small-Scale Projects Under JI
Carbon Finance at EBRD: IGOs’ perspectives
Joint implementation and eligibility requirements
Presentation transcript:

Joint Implementation and the Clean Development Mechanism Ben Feldman Managing Director Natsource LLC UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, Germany February 14, 2007 Some new thinking from Natsource. More growth. Less pollution.

Overview Comparison of CDM and JI Duration of Risks Side By Side Comparison Buyer (Investor) Preferences: Track I and II Conclusions Some new thinking from Natsource. More growth. Less pollution.

Comparison of CDM and JI I and II Major Risk(s) Minor Risk(s) CDM Project Registration Issuance Host Country* JI (I) Country JI (II) JISC/AIE Some new thinking from Natsource. More growth. Less pollution.

Duration of Risks All projects involve investment in activities that must persist over time, therefore all projects entail inherent technology/performance risk Distinction between CDM and JI relates to regulatory and country risks CDM Major regulatory risks “ends at registration” Host country approval is irrevocable Potential tax liability/credit retention may continue JI Track I Major regulatory risk “ends at country acceptance” Country risk continues JI Track II Country risks persist throughout crediting period Major JISC/AIE risks “end at final determination” Some new thinking from Natsource. More growth. Less pollution.

Side by Side Comparison CDM Mature process, though significant risks remain due to EB’s project by project approach JI Track I Limited experience Counterparties experience risk differently (government to government vs. government to private) JI Track II JI risk plus JISC issues Some new thinking from Natsource. More growth. Less pollution.

Buyer (Investor) Preferences: Track I and II Strength of sovereign guaranty (perceived and actual) Reliability of project/ technology and counterparty Relatively short payback (short carbon revenue window from 2008- 12) Track II Same as Track I, but take account of JISC risk Project activities with existing methodologies Some new thinking from Natsource. More growth. Less pollution.

Conclusions Once issued CERs, ERUs, likely fungible Differential value function of when investment is made and who carries risk At present JI carries more uncertainty (therefore risk) than CDM and this will be reflected in pricing, all else being equal Track II carries more risk than Track I Risk is attractive to investors that understand how to mitigate JI is thus viewed as a value opportunity Some new thinking from Natsource. More growth. Less pollution.

For Additional Information: Ben Feldman Managing Director Natsource LLC bfeldman@natsource.com +1-202-496-1423 www.natsource.com