Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Conformational Changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e2 (November 2017)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Phage Pierces the Host Cell Membrane with the Iron-Loaded Spike
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
The C. elegans SYS-1 Protein Is a Bona Fide β-Catenin
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structure of an Inactive Akt2 Kinase Domain
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Structural Insights into the Inhibition of Wnt Signaling by Cancer Antigen 5T4/Wnt- Activated Inhibitory Factor 1  Yuguang Zhao, Tomas Malinauskas, Karl.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of a Novel Globular Domain in RBM10 Containing OCRE, the Octamer Repeat Sequence Motif  Bryan T. Martin, Pedro Serrano,
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Oliver Weichenrieder, Kostas Repanas, Anastassis Perrakis  Structure 
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages R661-R662 (July 2016)
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Crystal structures of Nova-1 and Nova-2 K-homology RNA-binding domains
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 203-211 (January 2017) The BID Domain of Type IV Secretion Substrates Forms a Conserved Four-Helix Bundle Topped with a Hook  Frédéric V. Stanger, Tjaart A.P. de Beer, David M. Dranow, Tilman Schirmer, Isabelle Phan, Christoph Dehio  Structure  Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 203-211 (January 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.10.010 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2017 25, 203-211DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Crystal Structures of the BID Domain of Bartonella Effector Proteins Reveal a Novel Fold (A) Domain architectures of Bep6 from Bartonella rochalimae (BroBep6_tBID1), Bep9 from Bartonella clarridgeiae (BclBep9_tBID1), and BepE from Bartonella henselae (BheBepE_BID1) (from left to right). Vertical bars represent tandem-repeat tyrosine-phosphorylation motifs. (B–D) Side views of the crystal structures of (B) BroBep6_tBID1, (C) BclBep9_tBID1, and (D) BheBepE_BID1. (E) Superposition of the three structures shown in (B), (C), and (D), highlighting the similarity and compact nature of the BID fold. A stereo view is provided in Figure S1D. (F) Detailed structure of the α3-α4 linker, referred to as the hook, of BroBep6_tBID1 as representative for the three BID domain structures. The Cα trace is shown as cartoon and H bonds are shown as black dashed lines. The position of glycine residues is highlighted by spheres at their respective Cα positions. Residues discussed in the text are shown in stick representation. Secondary structure elements are labeled in light pink. (G) Sequence logo of three structures shown in (B) to (D) with secondary structure elements of the reference structure indicated. Residues of structural importance are marked with black triangles and residues of potential functional relevance are marked with red triangles. In addition, green arches indicate kinks in helices α1 and α4. The core of the BID domain is highlighted in beige. (H) Structure of BroBep6_tBID1 with residues conserved among the three structures shown as sticks. See also Figures S1, S2, and S5. Structure 2017 25, 203-211DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 BID Domain Arrangements and Subclasses in Beps and Relaxases (A) The BID domain architecture as seen in two relaxases (TraA from Agrobacterium fabrum and Riorf112 from Agrobacterium rhizogenes), a VbhT homolog (VbhT from Bartonella schoenbuchensis), and representative B. henselae Beps, with vertical black lines indicating Tyr phosphorylation motifs and +++ the positively charged C terminus. MobA, mobilization proteins of the MobA/MobL family; AAA_30, ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA) domain; FIC, filamentation induced by cAMP domain; OB, oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding fold. (B) Simplified neighbor-joining distance-based tree representation of the multiple sequence alignment of the BID domains from Beps and relaxases. The branches corresponding to Bep_tBIDx (ancestral) are colored in pink, Bep_tBIDx (derived) in blue, and Bep_BIDx in green (Engel et al., 2011). The relaxase tBID1 domains are colored in yellow, tBID2 in brown, and the BID1 in red. See Figure S3 for the full high-resolution tree shown here with species names and UniProt IDs. (C) Classification scheme of BID domains developed in this study. See also Figures S3 and S4. Structure 2017 25, 203-211DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Conservation Analysis of BID Domains (A) Comparison of residue conservation in BID subclasses defined in Figure 2C. For each subclass, the sequence logo is shown and the background is colored using the ConSurf conservation color scale ranging from cyan to magenta for low to high conservation. An overall sequence logo is shown above the subclasses, indicating only a low amount of globally conserved residues. (B and C) Overall conservation score mapped to the BroBep6_tBID1 structure. (B) Surface representation colored by overall conservation. The L374[A/R/K]G376 motif appears at the start of the hook. (C) Ribbon representation with conserved residues (ConSurf score ≥8) shown as sticks. (D) Surface representation of BroBep6_tBID1 colored by conservation of the BID domain in an ancestral tBID1 arrangement (last row of the alignment in A). The N and C termini appear well conserved when compared with the overall conservation shown in (B). Structure 2017 25, 203-211DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Electrostatic Potential of Experimentally Determined and Modeled BID Domain Structures The potentials have been mapped onto the respective protein surfaces with color code as defined in the inset. Protein backbones are shown in cartoon representation. (A) BroBep6_tBID1 (ancestral) (PDB: 4YK1), (B) BclBep9_tBID1 (derived) (PDB: 4YK2), (C) BheBepE_BID1 (PDB: 4YK3), and homology models of (D) BheBepA_tBID1 (ancestral), (E) BheBepE_tBID2 (derived), and (F) BroBep9_BID1. Structure 2017 25, 203-211DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions