Bulkley Valley-Lakes District Air Quality Ambient Air Quality Assessment: June 2006 AGM & Public Forum Benjamin Weinstein Air Quality Meteorologist Ministry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Airshed Management Planning in the Cariboo By Andy Motherwell Director, Area B Cariboo Regional District and Ric Raynor Director of Emergency Services.
Advertisements

1 Origin Renewable Energy - Energy from Waste (EfW) Plant at Magnetic Park, Desborough Appraisal of Air Quality Impacts Associated with Stack Emissions.
Modeling the New 1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) NAAQS Alan Dresser Research Scientist I October 14, 2011.
Inventory Issues and Modeling- Some Examples Brian Timin USEPA/OAQPS October 21, 2002.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE SCRUTINY OF 20MPH SPEED LIMITS Rupert Thacker Team Leader – Forward Planning and Rail Liaison.
Smoke Management in Idaho Fire, Smoke, and Health Workshop Diane Riley, DEQ Air Quality Analysis June 5-6, 2001, Seattle.
Air Quality Monitoring In Singapore
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
Smoke Management Updates Air Quality Regulations Refresher – National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Non-Attainment Areas – Visibility Protection.
Air Quality Management Initiatives for Kuala Lumpur: A study of stakeholder roles, emission sources, and vulnerable populations Dr. Scott Kennedy Energy.
Missouri Air Quality Issues Stephen Hall Air Quality Analysis Section Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Applied Sciences Team (AQAST) 9 th Semi-Annual.
2004 Technical Summit Overview January 26-27, 2004 Tempe, AZ.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Overview What we’ll cover: Key questions Next steps
Low-Wind/High Particulate Matter Episodes in the Calexico/Mexicali Region 1 The University of Utah 2 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 3 San Diego.
Resource Management (NES) Regulations 2004 Louise Wickham Ministry for the Environment.
Climate, Air Quality and Noise Graham Latonas Gartner Lee Limited RWDI Air Inc.
Hurricanes. Katrina approaching New Orleans August 2005.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Latvian Environmental, Geology and Meteorology agency Future development scenarios for traffic system and air pollution in Riga city Iveta Steinberga La.
P. Otorepec, M. Gregorič IVZ RS Use of rutinely collected air pollution and health data on local level for simple evaluation of health impact.
THE PEP Sub-regional workshop September 2013 Health effects of particulate matter: Policy implications for EECCA countries Marie-Eve Héroux Technical Officer,
Ozone Update Ben Wells U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Analysis Group February 11, 2014.
Imperial County PM 10 SIP: Update Imperial County APCD SIP Workgroup Meeting September 24, 2008.
Air pollution in Christchurch: defining and addressing the issues Andy Sturman Geography Department University of Canterbury.
Lead NAAQS Review: 2 nd Draft Risk Assessment NTAA/EPA Tribal Air Call August 8, 2007 Deirdre Murphy and Zachary Pekar OAQPS.
Air Quality in Grand Forks - Getting Started Playing catch up Making do Presented to the Clean Air Forum March 2008 By Chris Moslin, Chair BAQC.
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Burn Ban Program Jim Nolan – Mike Gilroy For the SHB 2261 Wood Smoke Work Group August 1, 2007 Jim Nolan – Mike.
Air pollution in Stuttgart ? NO 2 O3O3 PM 10. Stuttgart.
Elements of Air Quality Management Scientific Understanding Community Involvement Cooperative Planning Realistic Goal Setting Long Term Commitment Implementation.
1 Public Workshop to Discuss Amendments to the AB 2588 “Hot Spots” Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation California Air Resources Board.
Preliminary Analysis by: Fawn Hornsby 1, Charles Rogers 2, & Sarah Thornton 3 1,3 North Carolina State University 2 University of Texas at El Paso Client:
Air Pollution Control Program Regulation Update Presented to City Council Public Safety and Health Subcommittee Mamie Colburn, M.S, R.S. Missoula.
Imperial County 2013 State Implementation Plan for the Hour PM2.5 Moderate Non-attainment Area December 2, 20141, 2014.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
Final Meeting of the CAPACT project, 4-6 July 2007, Almaty, Kazakhstan M. Krzyzanowski and Kubanychbek Monolbaev WHO Regional Office for Europe EECCA participation.
‘Air Monitoring and Protection Strategies in EECCA’ UNECE/WGEMA Workshop, Geneva, 11 June 2007 Dr Hans-Guido Mücke for the WHO European Centre for Environment.
Shawn McClure, Rodger Ames and Doug Fox - CIRA
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
The CAMS Policy products
WESTAR Recommendations Exceptional Events EPA response
Forum for Air quality Modelling FAIRMODE ew. eea
Forecasts and Warnings
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
Examples of 1-Hour NO2 and SO2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP April 28, 2011.
COMPONENTS OF AQMP DEVELOPMENT
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
2015 State of Air Report and National Air Quality Indicator
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
Forest fires and air pollution in Portugal
NOTIFICATIONS OF TIME EXTENSIONS
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
BVLD Airshed Modelling Results
Brief Synopsis of Air Quality and Local/Regional Meteorology
Contributions to total changes in emissions of ozone precursors
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
JDS International seminar 2018
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Air Quality In Cambridge
Presentation transcript:

Bulkley Valley-Lakes District Air Quality Ambient Air Quality Assessment: June 2006 AGM & Public Forum Benjamin Weinstein Air Quality Meteorologist Ministry of Environment June 15, 2006

Overview Table 3-3, Goals Indicators and Strategies. Refresh of Micro-Emissions Inventory BVLD monitoring network update PM10: BVLD Annual average % potential episode days (PED) where PM10 daily average > 25 mg/m3 % days with average PM10 > 50 mg/m3 PM2.5: BVLD Annual Average Potential Episode days where PM2.5 > 15 % days where average PM2.5 > 30 mg/m3

Table 3-3 General Goals, Indicators and Strategies (page 3-8) 1) Gain better understanding of air quality in plan area Degree of agreement between modelled AQ and measured AQ during “episode scenarios” Comparison of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at locations in BVLD Gain experience through AQ modelling (CALPUFF) Expand AQ & meteorological modelling network

Table 3-3 General Goals, Indicators and Strategies (page 3-8) 2) Continuous improvement in air quality in the BVLD Mean annual PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations Reduce % of days where average daily PM10 concentration > 50 and PM2.5 > 30 ug/m3. Interim goal = 1% % of PED “potential episode days” where PM10 24 hour average is > 25 ug/m3 and PM2.5 > 15 ug/m3 by year and/or season Reduce/eliminate episodes via source specific emission strategies Education/operational changes to improve on AQ Bring forward emerging research & changing regulations and policies.

Table 3-3 General Goals, Indicators and Strategies (page 3-8) cont’d 2) Continuous improvement in air quality in the BVLD Improve AQ on all days (PED’s and non-PED’s) Average AQ on PED’s Average AQ on other days Monitor statistics and human health risks Reduce/eliminate episodes via source specific emission strategies Education/operational changes to improve on AQ Bring forward emerging research & changing regulations and policies.

Goal 1- Understand Air Quality Micro-Emissions Inventory completed, dispersion modelling underway. Quick refresher highlights In order to compare and contrast PM10 and PM2.5 must expand monitoring network.

PM10 Emission Source Breakdown for 2002

PM2.5 Emission Source Breakdown for 2002

Important Notice! Percentages are on an annual basis Do not always describe contributions at receptors People Monitors

Seasonality of Emissions ! Potential Source Indicators: Venting conditions PM 2.5/10 split in Houston, Smithers (and soon Burns Lake) Looking outside

BVLD Air Quality Episode History 25 13 28 33 12 12 19 20 26 12 19

BVLD-Continuous Monitoring Network Station Name Burns Lake Fire Centre Houston Firehall Smithers- St. Josephs Telkwa Station Location #8 4th Avenue 3382 11th Street 4020 Broadway 1304 Birch Street PM10 03 / 97- current 02 / 97- 02 / 98- 10 / 05 PM2.5 Install by 09 / 06 03 / 01- 04 / 07- current Meteorology Current 11 / 94- 01 / 98- Summary of active continuous monitoring for Particulate Matter and meteorology in the BVLD Airshed by the Ministry of Environment. *Telkwa Station was vandalized in Mid-October, 2005

BVLD Non-Continuous Monitoring Station Name Hazelton Kitwanga Station Location Northwest Community College Kitwanga School PM10 04 / 04 - current PM2.5 Meteorology (continuous) 08 / 05 – current (at New Hazelton Elementary School) 01 / 05 - current Summary of Active Non-Continuous Monitoring for Particulate Matter in the BVLD Airshed by the Ministry of Environment Continuous Meteorological monitoring has now been installed in Kitwanga and Hazelton

Goal 2: Improve Air Quality Many Strategies How are we doing?

Indicators: BVLD Annual Average PM10 (top) and PM2.5 (bottom) Implementation of plan PM10 Aished Management Initiation PM2.5

Indicator: BVLD % PED PM10 > 25 mg/m3 (daily average) Trend % of days PM10 > 25 mg/m3 (daily average) Note: These data include the % days PM10 > 50mg/m3 Note: Telkwa PM10 monitoring began in 1998 and ended in Oct 2005

Indicator: BVLD % days PM10 > 50 mg/m3 (daily average) % of days PM10 > 50 mg/m3 (daily average) Trend Interim Goal 1% Note: Telkwa PM10 monitoring began in 1998 and ended in Oct 2005

Indicator: BVLD Annual Average PM2.5 Trend (Houston) ? Particulate Matter Concentration (mg/m3) Note: Houston 2001 data covers July 26 onwards Smithers 2004 data covers August 20 onwards

Indicator: BVLD % PED PM2.5 > 15 mg/m3 (daily average) Trend (Houston) % of days PM2.5 > 15 μg/m3 (daily average) Note: These data include the % days PM2.5 > 30mg/m3

Indicator: BVLD % days PM2.5 > 30 mg/m3 (daily average) Trend (Houston) ? % of days PM2.5 > 30 μg/m3 (daily average) Interim Goal 1%. Is this too high? Let’s aim for 0.5 %

Summary Goal 1: Understand Goal 2: Improve CALPUFF dispersion modelling to continue through next year. Air quality and meteorological monitoring program in BVLD airshed is growing. Goal 2: Improve Indicators going both ways when comparing 2004 AQ to 2005, though 2005 was not a banner year for AQ From 2000 onwards indicators sending strong message Increased annual average PM10 Increased % days where PM10 > 50 μg/m3 Increased PED, where PM10 > 25 μg/m3 PM2.5 trends beginning to show in Houston but getting mixed messages. Too early to talk about Smithers.

Recommendations Dive into strategies that will affect indicators. Road dust and wood burning appliance emissions still need more attention. Add road dust to list of active sources in the Fall. In 2005 this was a factor Set interim goal for % days PM2.5 average > 30 μg/m3 to 0.5%. Forward thinking: Include Canada Wide Standard (CWS) as an indicator for PM2.5. Houston data exists and soon will Smithers (Long term vision for Telkwa and Burns Lake).

More on Potential Episode Days What really is a Potential Episode Day? “A day where, based on meteorological variables (still air, poor venting) the potential for an air quality episode exists, dependant on emissions”. Currently PED indicator is where PM10 24 hour average is > 25 ug/m3 and PM2.5 24 hour average is > 15 ug/m3 (by year and/or season) This makes assumptions about meteorological conditions.

Average AQ on PED’s What about still air? Our approach - look at: How do you define still? How much of the day must be still for it to be a ‘still air day’? Our approach - look at: Wind speed Hours of the day where wind was below certain speed.

Average AQ on PED Results

2005 PED Results (PM10 only) For Smithers: For Houston: Annual Average PM10 15.51 mg/m3 # Still air PEDs = 40 Annual Average PED PM10 = 22.35 mg/m3. Annual Average Non PED PM10 = 14.66 mg/m3. For Houston: Annual Average PM10 19.00 mg/m3 # Still air PEDs = 4 Annual Average PED PM10 = 35.31 mg/m3. Annual Average Non PED PM10 = 18.82 mg/m3.

2005 PED Results (PM10 only) For Burns Lake: Annual Average PM10 21.72 mg/m3 # Still air PEDs = 28 Annual Average PED PM10 = 36.58 mg/m3. Annual Average Non PED PM10 = 20.49 mg/m3.

Recommendations Continue to refine definition of PED Some areas are have less incident of calm winds Attempt to link ‘still air’ PED’s with PM10 24 hour average PED’s and see if there’s more common ground. Early stages, more to come.