Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Structure of a Ternary Transcription Activation Complex
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Structural Changes in TAF4b-TFIID Correlate with Promoter Selectivity
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 Complex Assembled on DNA and Its Implications for DNA DSB Repair  Laura Spagnolo, Angel Rivera-Calzada,
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Asymmetric Activation of the Hsp90 Dimer by Its Cochaperone Aha1
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Lock and Key to Transcription: σ-DNA Interaction
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Hubert Kettenberger, Karim-Jean Armache, Patrick Cramer  Cell 
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
RNA Polymerase Pausing Regulates Translation Initiation by Providing Additional Time for TRAP-RNA Interaction  Alexander V. Yakhnin, Helen Yakhnin, Paul.
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Mechanism of Transcription Termination by RNA Polymerase III Utilizes a Non-template Strand Sequence-Specific Signal Element  Aneeshkumar G. Arimbasseri,
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
NanoRNAs Prime Transcription Initiation In Vivo
Asymmetric Activation of the Hsp90 Dimer by Its Cochaperone Aha1
A Hand-Off Mechanism for Primosome Assembly in Replication Restart
Organization of an Activator-Bound RNA Polymerase Holoenzyme
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Lutz Riechmann, Philipp Holliger  Cell 
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (November 2005)
Transcription Initiation in a Single-Subunit RNA Polymerase Proceeds through DNA Scrunching and Rotation of the N-Terminal Subdomains  Guo-Qing Tang,
Mechanistic Basis of 5′-3′ Translocation in SF1B Helicases
Nuclear RNA Exosome at 3.1 Å Reveals Substrate Specificities, RNA Paths, and Allosteric Inhibition of Rrp44/Dis3  John C. Zinder, Elizabeth V. Wasmuth,
Ligand-Driven Vectorial Folding of Ribosome-Bound Human CFTR NBD1
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Hui Yang, Dinshaw J. Patel  Molecular Cell 
Translocation of σ70 with RNA Polymerase during Transcription
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
RNA Displacement and Resolution of the Transcription Bubble during Transcription by T7 RNA Polymerase  Manli Jiang, Na Ma, Dmitry G. Vassylyev, William.
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Structural Organization of the RNA Polymerase-Promoter Open Complex
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Alessandro Vannini, Patrick Cramer  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 755-766 (September 2012) Structural and Mechanistic Basis for the Inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase by T7 Gp2  Ellen James, Minhao Liu, Carol Sheppard, Vladimir Mekler, Beatriz Cámara, Bing Liu, Pete Simpson, Ernesto Cota, Konstantin Severinov, Steve Matthews, Sivaramesh Wigneshweraraj  Molecular Cell  Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 755-766 (September 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.013 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 RPc and RPo Formation and the Structure of the Gp2-β′ Jaw Fragment Complex (A) Cartoon depiction of RPc and RPo formation at σ70-dependent bacterial promoters (the inspiration for the cartoon was taken from Murakami and Darst [2003]). (B) Ribbon representation of the Gp2-β′ jaw fragment complex. (C) The same as (B) but rotated by 90° along the horizontal plane. In (B) and (C), the interface region is enlarged in the insets, and the residues located at the interaction interface are shown as sticks and labeled correspondingly. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Interaction of the β′ Jaw Domain with dsDNA (A) Surface representation of the Ec core RNAp model (Opalka et al., 2010) color-coded as in Figure 1A. The boxed region is enlarged and looks at the DNA-binding surface (shown in ribbon representation in insets i–iv). The β′ jaw domain is shown in green as a surface representation and forms part of the DNA-binding face (i). Inset (ii) is as in (i), but showing the path of the dwDNA from the current model of the RPo (Opalka et al., 2010). Highlighted in red are residues T1169, R1174, and M1189, which undergo significant chemical shift changes in β′ jaw fragment in the presence of dsDNA (B) and Gp2 (C). Inset (iii) is as in (ii), but showing the redefined path of the dwDNA in the dwDBC. Inset (iv) is as in (iii), but with the surface representation of Gp2 shown in cyan. Note the lack of steric clash between Gp2 and the β′ insertion 6 domain, which provides further support for our composite model. (B) Overlay of 2D 1H-15N HSQC spectra of the β′ jaw fragment with and without dsDNA recorded at pH 6.5, 303 K (see key for details). Peaks with significant chemical shift differences are indicated in red with their residue numbers (T1169, R1174, and M1189). (C) As in B, but showing the 2D 1H-15N HSQC spectra of the β′ jaw fragment with dsDNA (i.e., the β′ jaw fragment is 15N labeled) with or without unlabeled Gp2 (see key for details). Molecular Cell 2012 47, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Gp2 Requires R1.1 to Efficiently Inhibit RPo Formation by Eσ70 (A) Autoradiograph of 20% (v/v) denaturing urea gels showing the synthesis of the ApApUpU transcript (underlined nucleotides are α32P labeled) from the lacUV5 promoter by Eσ70 (lanes 1 and 2) and Eσ70ΔR1.1 (lanes 3 and 4) in the absence and presence of Gp2. The percentage of ApApUpU transcript synthesized (% A) in the reactions with Gp2 with respect to reactions with no Gp2 is given at the bottom of the gel for each reaction. (B) As above, but showing the synthesis of the ApApUpU transcript in the absence (lane 1) and presence (lanes 2–5) of Gp2 under conditions in which Eσ70ΔR1.1 was preincubated with increasing amounts of isolated R1.1 domain added in trans to the reaction (shown as the ratio of σ70ΔR1.1 to R1.1). For (A) and (B), all data obtained in at least three independent experiments fell within 5% of the % A value shown. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Gp2 Requires R1.1 of σ70, but Not the Consensus Promoter DNA Sequences, to Fully Inhibit RPo Formation by Eσ70 (A) Autoradiograph of a 20% (v/v) denaturing urea gel showing the synthesis of RNA-U from the MS probe by Eσ70 and Eσ70ΔR1.1 in the absence (condition I) and presence (conditions II and III) of Gp2. The percentage of RNA-U synthesized (% A) in the reactions with Gp2 with respect to reactions with no Gp2 is given at the bottom of the gel for each reaction. (B) As in (A), except that the reaction was conducted with Eσ70ΔR1.1 in the absence and presence (at ∼8-fold molar excess over σ70ΔR1.1) of isolated R1.1 domain added in trans. For (A) and (B), all data obtained in at least three independent experiments fell within 5% of the % A value shown. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Inhibition of RPo Formation by Gp2 Involves Long-Range Antagonistic Effects on Eσ70-Promoter Interactions (A) Autoradiograph of a 4% (v/v) native polyacrylamide gel comparing binding of Eσ70 to the +20/+20 (lanes 1 and 2) and −7/−7 (lanes 3 and 4) probes in the presence (lanes 2 and 4) and absence (lanes 1 and 3) of Gp2. (B) Graph showing the percentage of DNA bound by Eσ70 in the presence of Gp2 compared with reactions with no Gp2. The dsDNA probes with different downstream end points are indicated in the x axis of the graph. (C) Autoradiograph of 4% (v/v) native polyacrylamide gels comparing binding of Eσ70 with the +20/+20 (lanes 1–3) and +1/+1 (lanes 4–6) probes in the absence (condition I) and presence (conditions II and III) of Gp2. (D) Autoradiograph of a 4% (v/v) native polyacrylamide gel comparing binding of Eσ70 (lanes 1 and 2) and Eσ70ΔR1.1 (lanes 3–6) in the presence (lanes 2, 4, and 6) and absence (lanes 1, 3, and 5) of Gp2 to the +1/+1 probe. In lanes 5 and 6, the isolated R1.1 domain is present in trans. (E) Autoradiograph of 4% (v/v) native polyacrylamide gels comparing binding of Eσ70 to promoter probes with either the nontemplate or template strand ending at the −7 position (−7/+20 and +20/−7) in the absence (lane 2 and 5) and presence (lanes 3 and 6) of Gp2. In (A–E), the percentage of DNA bound by Eσ70 or Eσ70ΔR1.1 (% C) in the reactions with Gp2 with respect to reactions with no Gp2 is given at the bottom of the gels. The data obtained in at least two independent experiments fell within 3% of the % C value shown. (F) Autoradiographs of 20% (v/v) denaturing urea gels showing the synthesis of the ApApUpU transcript (underlined nucleotides are α32P labeled) from the lacUV5 promoter +20/+20 and −7/+20 probes by Eσ70 in the absence (lanes 1 and 3) and presence (lanes 2 and 4) of Gp2. (G) As in F, but using the −7/+20 probe comparing the activity of Eσ70 and Eσ70ΔR1.1 in the absence (lanes 1 and 3) and presence (lanes 2, 4, and 5) of Gp2. In lane 5, the isolated R1.1 domain is present in trans (at ∼8-fold molar excess over σ70ΔR1.1). In (F) and (G), the percentage of ApApUpU transcript synthesized (% A) in the reactions with Gp2 with respect to reactions with no Gp2 is given at the bottom of the gel for each reaction. The data obtained in at least two independent experiments fell within 5% of the % A value shown. See also Figure S4. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Gp2 Appropriates R1.1 to Efficiently Inhibit RPo Formation by Eσ70 (A and B) Measurement of FRET between fluorescein incorporated into σ70 at position 36 (σ70∗) and Rif during RPo formation in the absence (A) and presence (B) of Gp2. The fluorescence emission spectra are recorded with 482 nm excitation. (C) The FRET efficiency values and distance calculations are tabulated (see also Figure S5) and the values presented are averages obtained from two to three individual experiments; the estimated error in R0 is ∼10%. (D) Cartoon (as in Figure 1A) depicting the mechanism by which RPo formation is inhibited by Gp2 at σ70-dependent promoters. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions