SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Advertisements

Preamble Structure in ax
DL OFDMA Performance and ACK Multiplexing
Doc.: IEEE /0587r0 Submission May 2015 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza.
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Doc.: IEEE /86r0 Submission January 2015 Uplink MU Transmission and Legacy Coexistence Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Reza Hedayat, Newracom doc.: IEEE /829r0 Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Reza Hedayat Young.
May 2015 doc.: IEEE /0586r1 Slide 1 Frequency Diversity Options in OFDMA Date: Authors: Reza Hedayat, Newracom NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
Supported Resource Allocations in SIG-B
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
SIG-B Resource unit allocation coding
Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
NSYM and TPE at RX side for Midamble design
WUR and Efficiency Tradeoffs
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
UL OFDMA-based Random Access Parameter Set (RAPS) element
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Terminology for AP Coordination
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
SIG-B Resource unit allocation coding
SIG-B Resource unit allocation coding
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Terminology for AP Coordination
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Adaptive CCA for 11ax Date: Authors: September 2014 Name
Terminology for AP Coordination
WUR and Efficiency Tradeoffs
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Packet Design for Wake-up Receiver (WUR)
MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Uplink MU Transmission and Coexistence
Comment resolution on CID 20175
UL MU Random Access Analysis
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
HARQ Feasibility for EHT
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
OFDMA Performance Analysis
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
Uplink MU Transmission and Coexistence
Capability on Doppler Mode
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
20 MHz transmission in NGV
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Enhanced Resource Allocation Schemes for 11be
20 MHz transmission in NGV
Evaluation of PAPR in WUR FDMA transmission
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
Presentation transcript:

SIG-B Structure Date: 2015-09-12 Authors: September 2015 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 September 2015 SIG-B Structure Date: 2015-09-12 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Reza Hedayat Daewon Lee Sungho Moon Yujin Noh Newracom 9008 Research Drive, Irvine, CA 92618 reza.hedayat at newracom.com daewon.lee at newracom.com sungho.moon at newracom.com yujin.noh at newracom.com Reza Hedayat, Newracom John Doe, Some Company

September 2015 Outline In July 2015, the 11ax SFD was amended for the following structure for SIG-B HE-SIG-B is encoded on a per 20 MHz basis using BCC with common and user blocks separated in the bit domain. [15/873r0] For bandwidths ≥ 40 MHz, the number of 20 MHz subbands carrying different content is two and with structure as shown in Figure 1. Each square in the figure represents 20 MHz subband and 1/2 represents different signaling information. [15/873r0] In this contribution the overhead of this design is evaluated and a solution for lower overhead based on the same design is proposed Reza Hedayat, Newracom

SIG-B Overhead September 2015 Considering the suggested structured for SIG-B, the number of SIG-B symbols increases significantly compared to 11ac SIG-B SIG-B fields: Common field = info for all STAs about corresponding sub-bands User-specific field = AID/PAID + MCS + NSS + BF + FEC Additional fields = CRC + Tail bits SIG-B duration calculation: Common field = 11 bits; User-specific field = 17 bits; Additional fields = 14 bits; Number of SIG-B symbols for 2-10 STAs is 2-5 symbols Having 2-5 symbols for HE SIG-B brings more overhead to DL MU PPDU For larger than 10 STAs, the length of SIG-B becomes even larger Reza Hedayat, Newracom

September 2015 SIG-B Structure The current structure of SIG-B is based on [15/873r0] the following design choices: “Tradeoff between implementation complexity & efficiency Complexity: More subbands → more parallel decoders Efficiency: As BW increases, support more users without increasing SIGB duration. Number of users may not increase much in 80MHz and 160MHz because we will be scheduling large 40MHz and 80MHz users. Why the [1 2 1 2 . . .] structure? 80 MHz is a natural extension of 40 MHz In addition, assume one 40 MHz allotted to single large user (or as MU) and second 40MHz is allocated to many small units. Signaling scheme amortizes the overhead across two independent 20MHz. Likewise for 160 MHz” While the suggested design of 15/873r0 achieves the complexity goal, the efficiency can be further improved Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Narrow-band Fading Immunity of 20MHz September 2015 Narrow-band Fading Immunity of 20MHz Another design choice that is reflected in the design of 15/873r0 is to encode SIG-B is the immunity that per 20MHz-coding base offers vs wider bandwidths With simulation it is possible to see moderate to negligible gain for 20MHz vs 40MHz transmission bandwidth Reza Hedayat, Newracom

OBSS-Interference Immunity of 20MHz September 2015 OBSS-Interference Immunity of 20MHz Another design choice that is reflected in the SIG-B design of 15/873r0 is the immunity that per 20MHz-coding base offers in OBSS environments While one can argue that in presence of OBSS interference there is higher likelihood of decoding one of the two parts of SIG-B, it is not clear how much of this immunity can save the payload against the same interference Basically, in presence of OBSS interference, there is a better chance of successful SIG-B decoding only but not the payload Moreover importantly, not in all scenarios OBSS interference is a concern. For instance, in managed networks or unmanaged networks deployed in suburbs there is much less OBSS environment 1 2 80MHz DL OFDMA PPDU OBSS interference Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Alternative SIG-B Structure September 2015 Alternative SIG-B Structure An alternative of the design of 15/873r0 is to encode SIG-B on a per 40 MHz basis using BCC with common and user blocks separated in the bit domain. SIG-B duration calculation: Common field = 11 bits; User-specific field = 17 bits; Additional fields = 14 bits; Number of SIG-B symbols for 2-10 STAs is 1-3 symbols Compare this with 2-5 symbols from the 20MHz-based SIG-B design If HE-SIG-B is encoded on a per 40 MHz basis, the duration of SIG-B can be reduced by 1-2 symbols for the more practical number of STAs, and even more for when nSTAs>10 1 2 80 MHz 160 MHz Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Alternative SIG-B Structure September 2015 Alternative SIG-B Structure Some might argue that the OBSS-interference immunity that the design of 15/873r0 offers is useful in high-density unmanaged environments such as an apartment complex (simulation scenario 1) We agree that either of these designs could provide enough OBSS-interference immunity and efficient structure The design of 15/873r0 offers OBSS-interference immunity in high-density unmanaged environments The proposed design suggested here offers enough OBSS-interference immunity and efficient SIG-B structure in managed environments (wireless office, simulations scenario 2) and less-dense unmanaged environments 1 2 80 MHz 160 MHz Reza Hedayat, Newracom

Proposed SIG-B Structure September 2015 Proposed SIG-B Structure We propose that both of these designs to be allowed in an 11ax PPDU, where an AP decides which design fits best for the BSS it operates The choice of 20MHz vs 40MHz basis could be a per-PPDU decision where in SIG-A a single-bit field indicates it The choice of 20MHz vs 40MHz basis could be per Beacon interval decision where in Beacon frames the choice is indicated 1 2 80 MHz 160 MHz Reza Hedayat, Newracom

September 2015 Conclusion WE showed that the immunity that the current SIG-B design offers is more than enough for some environments (such as managed networks and suburban residential areas) and that would result to a lengthier SIG-B, hence more overhead for DL MU PPDUs We proposed an alternative SIG-B design that can be used along the current design where an AP decides which design fits best for the deployment Reza Hedayat, Newracom

SP1 September 2015 Do you agree to modify the following in 11ax SFD: HE-SIG-B is encoded on a per 20 MHz or 40 MHz basis using BCC with common and user blocks separated in the bit domain For bandwidths ≥ 40 MHz, the number of 20 MHz or 40 MHz subbands carrying different content is two and with structure as shown below. Each square in the figure represents 20 MHz (left) or 40MHz (right) subband and 1/2 represents different signaling information. The method to indicate 20MHz or 40MHz basis is TBD. 1 2 80 MHz 160 MHz Reza Hedayat, Newracom