Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Advertisements

Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
In situ Delivery of Tumor Antigen– and Adjuvant-Loaded Liposomes Boosts Antigen- Specific T-Cell Responses by Human Dermal Dendritic Cells  Martine A.
Renier Brentjens, MD, PhD
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Epstein-Barr virus–specific human T lymphocytes expressing antitumor chimeric T-cell receptors: potential for improved immunotherapy by Claudia Rossig,
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Will Engineered T Cells Expressing CD20 scFv Eradicate Melanoma?
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Human Leukocyte Antigen–DO Regulates Surface Presentation of Human Leukocyte Antigen Class II–Restricted Antigens on B Cell Malignancies  Anita N. Kremer,
FLT3 ligand administration after hematopoietic cell transplantation increases circulating dendritic cell precursors that can be activated by CpG oligodeoxynucleotides.
Optimizing EphA2-CAR T Cells for the Adoptive Immunotherapy of Glioma
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Virally infected and matured human dendritic cells activate natural killer cells via cooperative activity of plasma membrane-bound TNF and IL-15 by Lazar.
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
T Cells Redirected to EphA2 for the Immunotherapy of Glioblastoma
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Arming Cytokine-induced Killer Cells With Chimeric Antigen Receptors: CD28 Outperforms Combined CD28–OX40 “Super-stimulation”  Andreas A Hombach, Gunter.
Reversal of Tumor Immune Inhibition Using a Chimeric Cytokine Receptor
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Suppression of Murine Colitis and its Associated Cancer by Carcinoembryonic Antigen- Specific Regulatory T Cells  Dan Blat, Ehud Zigmond, Zoya Alteber,
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Human CD4+ T Lymphocytes with Remarkable Regulatory Functions on Dendritic Cells and Nickel-Specific Th1 Immune Responses  Andrea Cavani, Francesca Nasorri,
Chie Kudo-Saito, Hiromi Shirako, Tadashi Takeuchi, Yutaka Kawakami 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Optimizing EphA2-CAR T Cells for the Adoptive Immunotherapy of Glioma
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
In Vivo Expansion of Regulatory T cells With IL-2/IL-2 mAb Complexes Prevents Anti- factor VIII Immune Responses in Hemophilia A Mice Treated With Factor.
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Molecular Therapy  Volume 21, Pages S247-S248 (May 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Sindbis Viral Vectors Transiently Deliver Tumor-associated Antigens to Lymph Nodes and Elicit Diversified Antitumor CD8+ T-cell Immunity  Tomer Granot,
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Genetic Immunization With In Vivo Dendritic Cell-targeting Liposomal DNA Vaccine Carrier Induces Long-lasting Antitumor Immune Response  Arup Garu, Gopikrishna.
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Adoptive transfer of gene-engineered CD4+ helper T cells induces potent primary and secondary tumor rejection by Maria Moeller, Nicole M. Haynes, Michael.
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Collapse of the Tumor Stroma is Triggered by IL-12 Induction of Fas
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages (August 2019)
T-cell expression of second-generation CARs
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 769-778 (April 2015) Enhancing Antitumor Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Through Constitutive CD40L Expression  Kevin J Curran, Beatrijs A Seinstra, Yan Nikhamin, Raymond Yeh, Yelena Usachenko, Dayenne G van Leeuwen, Terence Purdon, Hollie J Pegram, Renier J Brentjens  Molecular Therapy  Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 769-778 (April 2015) DOI: 10.1038/mt.2015.4 Copyright © 2015 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Constitutive expression of CD40L by human T cells. (a) Schematic of retroviral construct encoding human CD40L vector; LTR, long terminal repeat; SD, SA, splice donor and acceptor; Ψ, packaging element. (b) Flow cytometry of CD4+ and CD8+ CD40L-modified T cells following retroviral gene transfer; x-axis, APC-conjugated antihuman CD40L (CD154). Results shown are representative of at least three independent experiments. (c) Enhanced proliferation of CD40L-modified T cells compared to mock-transduced T cells. (d) Enhanced secretion of soluble CD40L (sCD40L), IFN-γ, and GM-CSF of CD40L-modified T cells compared to mock-transduced T cells. Results for proliferation and cytokine secretion are combined from three independent experiments. (*Denotes statistical significance where P < 0.001 using Mann–Whitney test). GM-CSF, granulocyte–monocyte colony-stimulating factor; IFN-γ, interferon-γ. Molecular Therapy 2015 23, 769-778DOI: (10.1038/mt.2015.4) Copyright © 2015 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Augmented immunogenicity of CD40+ tumor cells by CD40L-modified T cells. (a) Flow cytometry showing upregulation of costimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD86), adhesion molecules (CD54, CD58, and CD70), HLA molecules (HLA Class I and HLA-DR), and the Fas-death receptor (CD95) on DOHH2 tumor cell line following coculture with CD40L-modified T cells (solid line) compared to culture with mock-transduced T cells from the same donor (gray line). (b) CD40− tumor (NALM6 shown) demonstrating no phenotypic changes following coculture with CD40L-modified T cells. All results are representative of at least three separate experiments. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. Molecular Therapy 2015 23, 769-778DOI: (10.1038/mt.2015.4) Copyright © 2015 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Augmented immunogenicity of CLL cells by autologous CD40L-modified T cells. (a) Flow cytometry of patient-derived CD40L-modified T cells following retroviral gene transfer with CD40L containing retroviral vector; x-axis, APC-conjugated antihuman CD40L (CD154). (b) Flow cytometry showing upregulation of costimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD86), adhesion molecules (CD54, CD58, and CD70), HLA molecules (HLA Class I and HLA-DR), and the Fas-death receptor (CD95) on CLL cells after coculturing with autologous CD40L-modified T cells (solid line) compared to cocultures with mock-transduced T cells from the same donor (gray line). All results are representative of at least three experiments using three separate donors. CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. Molecular Therapy 2015 23, 769-778DOI: (10.1038/mt.2015.4) Copyright © 2015 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Secretion of IL-12 and maturation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) by CD40L-modified T cells. (a) Cytokine analysis of culture media for cocultures (24 hours) between moDCs and CD40L-modified T cells from three separate donors demonstrating elevated IL-12p70 secretion. (b) Flow cytometry of moDCs demonstrating maturation following coculture with CD40L-modified T cells (solid line). All results are representative of at least three separate experiments. IL-12, interleukin-12. Molecular Therapy 2015 23, 769-778DOI: (10.1038/mt.2015.4) Copyright © 2015 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Efficient transduction of human T cells with a CAR/CD40L vector demonstrates enhanced cytotoxicity. (a) Schematic of retroviral construct containing 1928z-IRES-CD40L and Pz1-IRES-CD40L genes; LTR, long terminal repeat; SD, SA, splice donor and acceptor; Ψ, packaging element; CD8 indicates CD8 leader sequence; scFv, single chain variable fragment; VH and VL, variable heavy and light chains; TM, transmembrane domain. (b) FACS analysis of human T cells transduced to express 19-28z/CD40L vector (prestimulation) with subsequent enhanced expression of CAR/CD40L following coculture on AAPCs (NIH 3T3 fibroblasts expressing CD19 and CD80; 1928z/CD40LT cells shown) used for in vivo experiments. x-axis, PE-conjugated 1928z CAR-specific antibody (19e3); y-axis, APC-conjugated antihuman CD40L (CD154). Results are representative of at least three independent experiments. (c) As determined by standard 51Cr release assay 19-28z/40L T cells have significant increased ability to lyse DOHH2 tumor cells compared to 19-28z T cells. Results of cytotoxicity assay are combined from three independent experiments and effectors have not undergone prestimulation on AAPCs. (*Denotes statistical significance where P < 0.05 using Mann–Whitney test). AAPC, artificial antigen-presenting cell; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Molecular Therapy 2015 23, 769-778DOI: (10.1038/mt.2015.4) Copyright © 2015 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Tumor eradication and long-term survival following 1928z/CD40L T-cell infusion. Survival curve of SCID-Beige mice inoculated with DOHH2 tumor cells by intravenous (i.v.) injection 2 days before a single i.v. dose of CAR-modified T cells. Enhanced long-term survival was demonstrated in mice treated with 1928z/CD40L T cells (n = 22) as compared to a panel of control T cells (1928z group n = 13; Pz1 and Pz1/40L group n = 9). Results are combined from two independent experiments. (*Denotes statistical significance between the 1928z/40L group versus 1928z group where P < 0.005). CAR, chimeric antigen receptor. Molecular Therapy 2015 23, 769-778DOI: (10.1038/mt.2015.4) Copyright © 2015 The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions